Steven Stalin What Are You Buying When You Buy Organic

Have you ever wondered if organic foods are actually better for you? What if organic foods are not actually healthy and are just an immense scam from food companies to take your money away from you? In the documentary, In Organic We Trust, the narrator Kip Pastor attempts to persuade the viewers that, although the food system may be flawed, organic foods are actually better to consume. Pastor’s use of pathos and logos in this documentary are extremely credible and well structured, but the ethos Pastor provided in this documentary are not as well structured as the pathos and logos. Pastor does an excellent job in structuring the film In Organic We Trust, in an attempt to send his message across to the viewers. In the documentary in order to

Shapin said in “ What are you buying when you buy organic?” that “ Pollan did his own taste by shopping at Whole foods for an all-organic meal: Everything was good, except for the six-dollars bunch of organic asparagus………..Pollan shouldn’t have been surprise that it tasted like “ cardboard” ( pg. 433). On his own word for this it looks like Shapin had disagreed with Pollan about whole foods are better for a person than any other products of food. Something the texture and flavor of the food can vary to the way it was taken care of. Here is another type of disagreement with Pollan, “ Two small doors in the shed opened onto a patch of grass, but they remained shut until the birds were five or six weeks old, and two weeks later Pollan’s “ free range” chicken was a $2.99-a-pound package in his local whole foods. This meal was better- the corn-and-soybean chicken was certified organic and didn’t contain antibiotics-but still not perfect( pg. 437). Here it looks like Shapin has also disagreeing with Pollan because the price can vary from store to store for example something the things that are organic may cost more than a meal that has been process. The final quote of when Shapin agrees with Pollan on whole foods is; “Whole foods was grown without synthetic fertilizer; no toxic pesticides or fumigants were used to

Eliot Coleman’s article seems to take the approach that “organic” foods have shifting into becoming large and commercial enterprises that are not true to what the term used to mean. He seems to want to focus more on the health of various crops and wants to promote crops and livestock that are able to be healthy and naturally resistant to the environment. Then in Justin Rohrlich’s piece, there is a critical focus on the consumer who chooses to buy natural products from places like Whole Foods. This article seems to point towards the attitudes of those people and casts societal labels on them by accusing them of being privileged in their shopping and considering those who don’t consume organic to be of less importance. Both articles seem to dislike the commercialization of organic foods more so than the actual food itself. I don’t feel as though either author is taking the position of favoring standard foods over organic.

providing a theoretical lens through which to examine consumers’ underlying considerations to purchase organic food. It is

A healthy diet leading to a longer life. Doctors recommend organic foods for patients with heart or glucose problems and nutritional scientists have glorified it as the new fountain of youth. However, the truth is coming to light that these claims might be false, that organic foods might be causing people more harm than one may think. In his essay “What Are You Buying When You Buy Organic?” Author Steven Shapin states that “Earthbound notes that its farming techniques annually obviate the use of more than a quarter of a million pounds of toxic chemical pesticides and almost 8.5 million pounds of synthetic fertilizers, which saves 1.4 million gallons of the

In Steve Shapin article “What Are You Buying, When You Buy Organic?”, he comments that plastic package food is grown with no extra chemicals used to enhance the product shelf life. In his article, he mentions that though this is how we think organic food is, he argues that the meaning of organic has changed. He also advocates that buying organic food isn’t produce as the organic food you buy from local farm markets. Steve Shapin states, “organic then isn’t necessarily local, and neither organic nor local is necessarily sustainable.”; (Pg.431). Although it isn’t said directly, I personally think Steve is suggesting that just cause its organic doesn’t necessarily mean it is all organic.

These 2 passages is an argument about whether organic fruit is worth the high price it has. I think organic foods is not worthwhile because the prices are high. It really isnt better that conventionally fruit, and only about 40% of Gen Xers beleive that it is organic.

If we go to a supermarket around the corner, we can see several organic food products displayed on the shelves. It is also observed that many consumers prefer buying organic groceries over conventional foods to stay healthy. Also, many a times we hear people consuming organic dietary supplements daily for overall wellbeing. Why do the majority of people favor organic foodstuffs? Are they really nutritious and healthier? We tried finding answers and clarified controversies about the organic foods through this article.

Interest in organic food has been increasing over the past decade. The United States Department of Agriculture(USDA) defines the term organic as:“... a labeling term that indicates that the food or other agricultural product has been produced through approved methods ” (“Consumer Information,” 2014, para. 1). In fact, consumers have become aware about food quality, and this has increased the sales of organic foods. According to The Organic Trade Association (2011), organic food sales have been identified as the largest growth segment in U.S. agriculture, with sales increasing from $3.6 billion in 1997 to $26.7 billion in 2010. This increase is due to of many factors. One of them is the labels which influence people to buy organic food. The U.S. federal government utilizes informational product labeling (such as “organic” or “natural” labels) as a way to influence consumers’ knowledge and purchasing patterns. (Caswell & Mojduszka, 1996). There is no doubt that organic food labels motivate consumers to purchase these types of foods. It is therefore of interest to study the influence of these labels on consumers ' choices.

In a September third, 2012 edition of The Stanford Medicine News Center in an article entitled “Little evidence of health benefits from organic foods, study finds” Michelle Brandt argues that certified organic fruits, vegetables, meats, dairy and other certified organic food goods, may not be worth the higher prices. Brandt states that certified organic is around 50% more expensive at most retailers. Opposing views of certified organic goods have often claimed that the higher prices are worth the health benefits. Brandt states that there have been multiple studies done on the various types of organic and certified organic goods and that they have been somewhat inconclusive. Despite the fact that they have found a bit higher percentages of vitamins in organic goods, the higher rates are only shown in vitamins that are rare in which to have a dietary deficiency. Brandt also states that the lower rates of pesticides found in organic foods is not worth the cost, due to the fact that the levels found in traditionally grown items were within the limits set by the government as healthy to consume. Lastly Brandt leads the reader to believe that eating healthier foods in general, such as a diet high in fruits and vegetables, is the most important way to be a healthier individual. The higher price of organic goods could lead people away from buying any produce due to believing that they must buy organic goods in order to truly be healthy.

2. This article is discussing the issue of whether or not we should be spending the money on organic produce over non organic produce. They are clearly portraying that organic food should be purchased and consumed over non organic food. They convey the message that non organic food is relatively a newer concept than organic produce as it has only come into place since 1950s, where before this all food was originally organic grown. Non-organic farmers have at their disposal an arsenal of over 320 pesticides and they use them routinely. Evidence links some of these pesticides with developmental damage to mammals that could lead to cancers, developmental problems and birth defects. They’re claims that these pesticides are all below “safe limits, but it is all very suspicious, whereas organic produce is hardly ever found with any traces of harmful pesticides or food additive as they are only available to very limited numbers. Same goes with their animals, they are only treated with antibiotics when they show clinical signs of illness. Although organic food costs more this article is in the opinion the non-organic farming is cracking at the seams, that is unable of delivering safe, healthy food, treating animals humanely, or taking care of the environment properly. Concluding that Organics is the only organised, coherent, global alternative to this failed industrial food experiment.

Inorganic is a word everyone associates with healthy food. It can be spotted on the labels in supermarkets and local grocery stores. The demand for organic food has even increased as more people associate it with being healthy and environmentally friendly. However, how “organic” is organic food? Is organic food worth the extra cost? Does organic food have that much more nutrients than conventional food? These are all questions that ponder many people's brains. Organic food receives mixed reviews. Some perceive it to be much more beneficial than conventional foods while others do not. However, organic food is worth the recognition it receives as it is high quality. The market for organic food is worth the extra dollars because it is very beneficial for human health, the environment, and animal production.

Our country today is diverse in so many ways; food, music, languages, ethnicities, etcetera. People who live in the United States are from all over the world and therefore, they all have different customs. One thing that everyone shares is the fact we all care about where our food comes from and how it impacts our bodies. Now, some people care about it more than others but we all want to have an idea of where our food is coming from and how it is being produced and imported. One path that people are going down the most is buying organic products.

One of the author’s large arguments is that organic food products have now become mainstream enough that everyone knows what an organic product means, which has inevitably made organic less than organic set out to be. With the government’s organic certification process, they have corrupted the organic movement. I both agree and disagree with the author’s

In the U.S., the introduction of the organic farming is normally credited to J.I. Rodale. The explanations behind producing and purchasing organic food are individual and can be mind boggling. Be that as it may, most will fall into three classifications: health, community, and environment. The organic development is based on a central rule: healthy soils lead to healthy crops, healthy animals, healthy humans, and a healthy planet (Pierce and Tilth, 2014). Organic crops and animals generation concentrates on building soil organic matter and science to make a practical, dynamic condition for delivering biological sustenance and food. Organic horticulture is additionally observed as an approach to manage and bolster family cultivates in inclination to faceless, constantly extending super and corporate farm models.