preview

Stone Cold Essay

Decent Essays

How does Robert Swindells encourage the reader to sympathise with the poor in Stone Cold? Robert Swindells’ Stone Cold is a novel that follows the lives of two very different people, Link, a homeless boy living of the streets, and Shelter, an ex-army officer who is obsessed with eradicating the homeless from the streets of London. Swindells uses many methods in order to make the reader feel sympathetic towards the homeless people of Stone Cold. Swindells victimises and dehumanises the poor, making the reader sympathise with the helplessness of the poor. He writes Stone Cold in first person to give the reader a singular view of the events, helping them sympathise with the poor themselves, and Swindell uses irony to make the reader sympathise …show more content…

Swindells use of irony is to make the reader think about deeper about the lives of the poor. A prime example of Swindells’ irony is when he describes Link and Ginger as ‘two lost boys off to the Never Never land.’ (p68). This is an allusion to J.M Barrie’s narrative Peter Pan. This statement is ironic as it implies that Link and Ginger are off on an adventure, when in reality they were on their way to sleep in an overcrowded barge. Swindells also uses dramatic irony to create sympathy for the homeless. This happens when the characters begin to discuss the disappearances of their friends, especially Toya and Ginger. The reader is able to make assumptions from the text about what has happened. The reader sympathises with the homeless population as they know what has happened to the missing people. The final and most impactful piece of irony in Robert Swindells’ Stone Cold was the way the novel ended. After Shelter’s arrest and Gail revealing who she was, Link was left to go back to living on the streets, nothing had changed. The irony lay in the fact that Shelter got ‘a roof, a bed, and three square meals a day. [Link] didn’t.’ (p131). This truly makes the reader sympathise with the poor, especially Link, as even though Link helped catch Shelter, he gained no reward, save for the money he received from Gail before she left. Swindells purposely ended his narrative this way for his readers to keep on sympathising with the poor. The reader can safely assume that Link remained homeless after the end of the novel, and possibly until the end of his life. Had Stone Cold ended with a happy ending, the reader would not continue to sympathise with the poor, as they would believe escaping poverty to be easier than it

Get Access