Stop Animal Testing

Protesting has been going around the world for many of years. Throughout many years of people boycotted agents a situation they believe, if a wrong or right. One of the biggest areas on where people gather around and protest is when they’re fighting agents animals testing. As well as the years has pasted on protesting on animals, it became more sires in increased in the 1960’s and 1970’s. Many cosmetics companies been testing on animals throughout the years there is also many that have not. The cosmetics line LUSH has been fighting over animals testing for over thirty years and will continue to fight for their right according to the company. When LUSH had first started the company had divided they didn 't ever wanted to test their product on animal. Not only fighting agents animals testing LUSH is also ego friendly; everything they use its plants, oil, and recycle. Since LUSH having to be agents animal testing, policies had created to work with the companies of cosmetics to end the cruelty of animals. The LUSH company say “ This can be done without animal testing …” and it true. LUSH is a company that all there product dills with ones skin to make them fell and look beautiful. If LUSH can test their products other than animals and still make your still looking good then, other cosmetics companies can do the same.

There are over 26 million different types of animal being tested on for research each year in the United States. Animals are used for testing every year for human research. Different animals go through serious pain, in order for humans to facilitate growth in different fields of study. Many animals are used in order to study diseases and potential cures for the diseases. New research chemicals are tested on animals with similar structures to humans, to see if the medicine can help with certain diseases. Tons of scientific advancement has taken place because of animal testing. Without animal testing, many diseases would still exist, without a safe way to test for potential cures. The issue at hand is the type of treatment that animals have to endure because of the different testing methods. They are treated very poorly, go through intense suffering, and normally have very poor living conditions. A pro to animal testing is that many cures and different medicines have been developed through animal testing. Without animal testing, many diseases would still exist without cures. Secondly, animals have a much shorter life span than humans do, so scientists can study the results through the whole life span of the animal. With humans, it is hard to do a full test because we have such high lifespans, while animals tend to live a lot less longer. Thirdly, many animals have been saved because of animal testing. Many diseases animals deal with now have vaccines and cures, as a result of animal testing. Without it, many animals would have rabies or other types of virus that can be detrimental to the animal’s health. On the contrary, a con to animal testing would be the pain many animals go through as a result of the testing. The tests are experimental, so we don’t know exactly what the chemical drug will do to the animal. Many cases have turned bad and many animals have died as a result, or gone through extensive pain. Next, there are many alternative methods of experimental testing that doesn’t require animals. As a result, why are we still using animals for testing when there are other ways to do it. Finally, animals are different from humans, so they make poor testing subjects. We can’t know for sure how the research

Some people argue that animal testing is necessary for scientific advancements to find cures and treatments. This is true, vaccines for polio and hepatitis B were used on animals and were successful. Thalidomide was also used on pregnant animals and it was found to cause birth defects. This is an understandable concern, however animals had to suffer for these advancements and it’s inhumane. According to the U.S Department of Agriculture, in 2010 97,123 animals

In the article “PETA Should Rethink Its Campaign against Animal Research,” by Jamie L. Vernon, explains that animal testing is a source for finding new treatments for many diseases. The article states that some treatments for diseases involving genetic, and the nervous system can only be found through animal testing. The article also states that even though animals are being killed in the experiment, it is a necessary action to take. The article tells that the ban on animal testing would “significantly impair” the research for new treatments. Article such as Susan Crowell “Animal research saves lives of both humans and animals,” published by Farm and Dairy contribute to the controversy by highlighting the need for animal testing.

An estimated 26 million animals are being tested on yearly. Animal testing has helped humanity in many ways ever since it started about 2,500 years ago. Cures have been created for many viruses and sicknesses but it has come with a cost to the animals. Animals are being put in horrendous living conditions that often cause them anxiety and pain. People in favor of animal of animal testing argue that we should keep testing on animals to further scientific research, while those against animal testing believe that there are other ways to achieve the same results.

Animal testing is weird. You would have never thought scientists could learn so much about diseases in a human body from a completely different animal. It’s amazing how people are able to learn so much by testing on other animal bodies. We also have to think about stopping animal testing, though. Many animals die because of testing. By continuing testing on animals, we lower the death rate of all animals each day, human and animal suffering decreases, and less of your hard earn money would be spent.

Animal testing should be stopped because animal bodies aren’t models of the human bodies. Professor James Hickman states “We have cured over 200 diseases in rats and mice that has not translated to humans because our physiology

Animal research leads to vaccinations that saves many lives. For example, Polio, a very deadly disease, used to kill over sixty thousand people per year just in the U.S, but thanks to animal testing, that number has been reduced to just one to two per year. Animal testing hasn’t just helped humans, it has helped animals too. Many diseases that are deadly to dogs and other kind’s animals such as rabies and heartworms are now treatable

Animal testing has provided us with many life saving treatments. By using animals to test medications, scientists are able to create new drugs and find cures. Without animal testing, the cure for many diseases would not exist and thousands of people

“ Animal research and testing has played a part in almost every medical breakthrough of the last century. It has saved hundreds of millions of lives worldwide” Joan Ryan, a former UK home office minister, claims that without animal testing, diseases wouldn’t be cured, or there wouldn’t be any treatments for the disease. Without animal testing certain medicines, cures, and biomedical engineering wouldn’t exist or be as proficient. An estimated 26 million animals have been used to test medical vaccines for diseases. Scientists also use animals to test the toxicity of the vaccines. Animal testing may come off as a rather harsh and inhumane form of study when heard about , but without it, global diseases would be spreading faster and possibly everyone will be infected. Nearly every Nobel Prize winner in Physiology or Medicine since 1901 relied on the information based off of animal research. Since animal testing has been used for research purposes many diseases have been cured and are no longer existent and if not cured then the disease is close to being cured.

Thanks to animal research, many diseases that once killed millions of people are now either treatable or curable. Animal testing has not only benefit humans, but animals as well. Some animal testing has lead to life saving and life extending treatments for many of the animals used for testing. A complete alternative to animal testing has yet to be discovered.

If animal testing was not utilized research for many cures would still to this day being underway. Testing on animals has given humanity many cures and antidotes, saving millions of lives throughout the world. This type of testing, when done humanely has allowed for quicker research in there respective

Imagine this; you are scrolling through your social media, you see an adorable little puppy, and the next thing you know, you are putting on mascara for the day. The truth is, that cute puppy you just saw, his family had to endure so much pain for your makeup that is not even crucial for you. Daily, animals go through tons of suffering for humans and their ‘necessities’. Scientists perform experiments to observe which merchandise is acceptable in the consumer world. Humans need to stop using animals for testing because it is cruel and inhumane, animals and humans are very diverse, and the trials are expensive while also being quite time-consuming. Recent scientific data has confirmed that animals should not be used as test subjects for different products, and everyone needs to work together to stop humankind in its tracks now.

Not only does animal testing benefit humans, but it also benefits other animals as well. While practicing animal testing on other animals, it has given the medical knowledge to veterinarians in knowing how to treat an animal with what medication or just physical assistance. The National Association for Biomedical Research wrote that “Last year, Americans spent $60B on their pets, much of it on pet health care. It is imperative every pet owner understands that without animal research their pets wouldn’t benefit from new veterinary treatments for cancer, new vaccines for emerging diseases, and the best possible nutrition available. Thanks to animal research our pets live longer and healthier lives than ever before” (NABR 2017). People who are

Animal testing is conducted every day for scientific research. About twenty-five million animals participate in experiments annually. These tests occur in order to determine how chemicals or products can affect a human body. Although the use of the animals has advanced scientific research, there is a worldwide debate on the belief that the use of animals in experiments is immoral. The US government did not require animal testing until a drug, elixir sulfanilamide, was put into certain products causing people to die. Many people died from the consumption of the liquid drug, not knowing such a thing was so deadly. Afterwards US Congress passed a “Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act” in 1938. This concurrent law forces new medications and chemicals to be tested on animals before taking a risk to test them on humans. In the article “Animal Testing” the author explains that medicines and certain chemicals are required to be tested on animals before being allowed to use on humans by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Marc R Fellenz states in 1966 the United States invented legal control over animal experimentation using the Animal Welfare Act. This regulates animal tests by requiring research laboratories to establish animal care and committees to monitor the treatment of these experimental subjects. Knowledge from such experiments provide a foundation for education in human anatomy and physiology. Occasionally, scientists will experiment on animals with