Stop the Tuition Inflation Essay

The Higher Education Act of 1968 authorized the beginning of the first 121 Services for Disadvantaged Students Programs (what would later become Student Support Services) (Groutt 2003b). With the election of President Richard Nixon in 1969 came the fear that the Office of Educational Opportunity, which then housed TRIO Programs, would be wiped out. Rather than dismantling the Office of Educational Opportunity, he decentralized TRIO Programs so that they would be managed via 10 regional centers, rather than via Washington (Groutt 2003b). The Presidency of Jimmy Carter would bring the administration of TRIO Programs back to Washington in 1972 (Groutt 2003b).

Continuing his war on poverty, Johnson passed numerous education bills and acts. The Higher Education Act of 1965 has had great impact on the American education system. In addition to helping low income students, this program created scholarships, which created more opportunities for students living in poverty. The Bilingual Education act of 1968 created a pathway for equal education for students who could speak little to no English. While it didn't do much, the amendments added to this act later on helped give children equal opportunities in

Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 provided federal aid for public schools. The legislation was

The Higher Education Act of 1965 was more or less an extension of the latter act, as its goal was to strengthen the educational resources of American colleges and universities, as well as providing federal funding for post-secondary students. Moreover, according to Americans for Democratic Action, the educational program was extended by improving the National Defense Education Act in order to include history and geography, English, and civics, which allowed for a broader range of subjects. Finally, the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965 provided federal

Abstract: This paper will discuss the Federal Pell Grant and the legislation behind it as well as the Higher Education Act of 1965 and it’s reforms since then. This appears purpose is to show the faults within these programs and to then show possible ways people have tried to reform it. The final part of this paper will be my opinion on how the legislation can be fixed along with using data and information from recent research done on the subject. It is the hopes that these recommendations will then be used to further stabilize this piece of legislation in the future.

According to the U.S. Department of Education, the Title I funding program is depicted as a policy that “provides financial assistance to local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools with high numbers or high percentages of children from low-income families to help ensure that all children meet challenging state academic standards” (“Title I, Part A Program”). The program was intended to close the gap between low income students and others with sufficient income. The policy was introduced January 12, 1965 and passed on April 9, 1965. Throughout time, Title I funding has been thought to be efficient ad successful, however, there is new evidence and data contradicting this statement. Title I funding negatively affected students because it

Accelerating tuitions causing student debt loans are making college education harder for students, mainly those of low income. College acceptance has become a large competition across America between all students to get as many good scholarships as they can, leaving those who have no money stuck behind scrabbling for whatever they can get. Since 1978, college tuition has raised up to 1,122, making it the highest tuition fee in American History. All while decreasing the amount of lower class students going to college. American colleges need to lower tuition fees in order to create more opportunities for future generations, having less Americans in debt, and stop seeing college education as a barrier but instead.

the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009) for students who are enrolled in one of the first four years of postsecondary education and are carrying at

Due to the increase in college students, the Higher Education Act expanded. Loans and grants were made to help students who really needed it. Also, something else made a change. Instead of the government financing the loans, bankers were now responsible. It was also said that if students defaulted, the government would cover the tab. The lawmakers supported the idea because outstanding loans

b. As they had done for veterans, the National Defense Education Act passed in 1958, the federal government now distributed its civilians funds for higher-education institutions. (Urgo, 2012)

From the politician to the student, everyone agrees that education is key in creating upward mobility, but the community colleges in California are turning out to ineffective in serving the students that need them the most. There is a huge conflict on what type of changes need to be implemented to reform the community colleges, but as with most debates and no central consensus, nothing is being done about the community colleges in California. Burecracy from the central governing body to all the way at the administration of each community colleges seem to stagnate the changes required for improving community colleges.

The U.S. government has created a new strategy to make colleges more affordable for low income students. Federal student aid’s primary goal is to help as many students attend college as possible. Financial aid and Pell Grants help low income students who meet certain academic criteria cover the costs of tuition. Low income students are getting a chance to attend college and increase graduation rates from four-year institutions to help close the poverty gap. Colleges and universities should make low income high school students aware of programs that will help them enroll and afford their education. Schools teach low income students that college is a key to their financial independence and a better life. High schools teach Seniors that in order to improve your social standing, employment options and salary expectations, a college education is often necessary. Financial aid is central to the successful enrollment and retention of low-income students. The majority of these students (90 percent) getting financial assistance from government. By maximizing Pell grant award amounts for low-income students, reforming the student loan program, and eliminating bank subsidies, colleges and universities can be affordable.

Presently, the availability of educational opportunities at the college and university level is a critical state and personal interest given the needs of the state for a well-educated workforce which has never been greater. Too many, the focal point of attending college is receiving a high paying job in the future. Unfortunately, in most states, tuition is on the rise and students who come from low-income families find themselves struggling to fund their education. According to legislatures, “The cost of college in New Jersey, as in the nation, continues to grow faster than the rate of inflation.” (State of New Jersey 1). In the national financial aid policy resources that are typically given to the neediest families are shifting towards

As the cost of college rises to an astronomical amount, many American’s find themselves faced with inequality once again. Inflation associated with the cost of higher education is now bordering on the ethical question, is a college education, a right or a privilege? With the ever increasing wage gap in America, the middle class and lower class find themselves struggling to gain a college degree. This pondering thought led me to my research question: is it ethical to continually raise the cost of tuition? By researching this topic, I set out to learn the reasoning behind constantly increasing the cost of tuition and if the nation as a whole should have the opportunity to attend college, regardless of income level. My research question is important because it will inform future college students how their tuition money is being spent, why the cost of education is continually rising and if there is anything they can do to counteract the cost of college.

The words tax and tuition once had nothing in common but the letter t at the start of each word. That is about to change and some say for the better while others cry foul. The rising tuition rate of many colleges is forcing new ideas on how to combat it. This issue of rising tuition rate gave light to the idea using taxes to help pay for tuition in a form of a scholarship.