Strategic Choice Theory

One of the biggest, but not most obvious reasons for switching to renewable energy is that it will pay for itself. One of the first things people think about when they make an investment is price; Sure acquiring renewable energy such as solar power right now may not be cheap but as a matter of fact during the duration of 2009-2014 the price of solar power dropped 78%(Gardiner)! The best part about solar power is that it is available to nearly anyone. Likewise wind power has also dropped 58% in price and now is among one of the cheapest sources of power in the United States (Gardiner) even though wind power is not available to the ordinary citizen. Switching to renewable energy will save a boat load of money as the article “Committing to Renewable Energy Will Pay Off” states “Investing in a renewable energy as the source for electricity in our future will save 10 times the

This paper will cover two criminological theories and they will be applied to two types of criminality. The two theories chosen for the paper were developmental theory and rational choice theory. The two types of crimes that were chosen were organized crime, specifically focusing on gangs, and terrorism. Then the crimes will be compared and contrasted. Finally, the developmental theory will be applied to organized crime to explain why and how it happens. The rational choice theory will be applied to terrorism to explain what compels individuals to attempt this form of criminality.

Rational choice theory originates from the oldest criminological school of thought and criminological theorists, but the theory itself is new, only forming in the last five decades. Ronald Clarke and Derek Cornish, using the work of previous criminologists, put forth the rational choice perspective as a criminological theory (Adler, Mueller, & Laufer, 2016). This theory has its roots in the classical school of thought in which individuals had the power to make decisions after weighing the consequence of such actions (Adler, Mueller, & Laufer, 2016). The work of Cesare Beccaria in the late 1700’s cemented this theory’s existence from the beginning of criminology (Adler, Mueller, & Laufer, 2016). Rational choice theory was also greatly influenced by Jeremy Bentham and his idea of felicific calculus, in which a decision to commit crime is made after putting risk variables in an equation (Adler, Mueller, & Laufer, 2016). Bentham says all humans work this way, evaluating whether a crime is worth committing (Adler, Mueller, & Laufer, 2016). Bentham was inspired by utilitarian theory, which states that individuals make decisions to maximize profits and minimize pain (Adler, Mueller, & Laufer, 2016). In addition, rational choice theory is also based on traditional economic choice theory that states people will choose what will appease their desires after weighing their options (Adler, Mueller, & Laufer, 2016). This paper will examine the effectiveness of the application of rational

In the Address “On the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Seventh Anniversary” by Barack Obama, people could see the use of descriptive assumptions about the economy of America and the use of renewable energy policies that supports Obama’s Government. Those different assumptions performed are well received by the audience. Or at least those assumptions caused a good reception in the thinking of people respect to the recovery of the economy of America and the innovation in the use of clean energy. Also, it is important to recognize some illogical assumptions in this speech of Obama.

Renewable energy has currently become a significant aspect in the countries generation, combination, and a constitution focus of government policy for energy, and environmental protection. As a result of public’s growing responsibility for the environment and constantly binding rules, and regulations of emission in the electric power industry, government has facilitated policies to boost the amount of renewable energy in the electricity generation portfolio. Additionally, the generation of electricity from renewable resources creates insufficient, and frequently, zero emissions of pollutants that comes from traditional fossil fuel production technologies. The additional use of renewable energy aids utilities in their emission agreement obligations. Furthermore, the anticipation of agreement with any future carbon emissions management would further toughen the incentive to move towards cleaner electricity creating technologies (Langwith, 2009).

Continued investment should be encouraged in order to develop the best technology in energy for the future. Continued investment will allow for new and exciting developments that will improve the energy industry in the long run. It will assist the industry in satisfying the growing demand and need for sustainability. There are a number of political and legal factors that are significant to the energy industry. For example, laws and government regulation on energy use could potentially affect the demand for domestic energy and thus lead to a shift in prices. However, with an increase of clean energy use, the demand for energy will not change dramatically due to laws and regulations, instead, the future prosperity of the globe will improve.

I originally reasoned that renewable energy was effective and because it could not run out, it was a much better option. But, the credibility and reasoning of Spector’s argument, along with the fallacious arguments of the Union of Concerned Scientists, I now believe that renewable energy is not beneficial to energy companies. After looking at numerous articles, it was clear that the UCS purposefully overlooked many facts that rendered their argument, and article, useless. They had disregarded the sheer ineffectiveness of renewable energy and the previous failures of implementing renewable energy (Jogulekar, Scientific American). For example, Germany, a world leader in renewable energy, tried to go all solar, but they failed, having to eventually import nuclear energy from France and opening up coal plants. Jogulekar asserts that Germany would have created less carbon dioxide if they simply stuck to nuclear energy. Spector asserts that a 100% renewable energy grid is far from beneficial, it is not even feasible. Looking at all arguments, I agree with Spector and that nuclear energy should be implemented and is far more beneficial to energy companies for a few reasons – because of its reliability, its low carbon emission and its extreme efficiency. I have come to the conclusion that switching to renewable energy is not beneficial to energy companies as there are many other low carbon alternatives. Spector’s arguments and his article is more reliable than the UCS’s. For this reason, renewable energy is not beneficial to energy companies, and nuclear energy, because it is more efficient and reliable, should be

This proves that there are benefits to using renewable energy such as the how they are affected by the cost of fossil fuels. They assert, “When the price of fossil fuels increases, the economics of renewable energy sources improves and there is an economic incentive to invest in renewable energy. When fossil fuels are cheap, many renewable forms of energy… fossil fuels increases, many forms of renewable energy become economically viable” (Enger and Smith

The goal of Choice-Making Strategies allows the child to indicate their preferred want as well as provide an opportunity to communicate. Choices can be presented throughout the day in a variety of settings such as meal time, playtime, and daily routines. This goal consists of offering two favorable objects to encourage the child to participate in play. The communication process will be determined and accepted when the child reaches out to touch the desired item at least five times a day for 2 weeks.

The best theory that is best to clarify criminal conduct is Rational choice theory. This theory was picked specifically in light of the fact that criminal conduct is the same as noncriminal conduct. This has been looked into on account of individuals perpetrated violations, nobody constrains them to do anything that he or she wouldn't like to do yet another reason is they surmise that the reward for the wrongdoing would be more fulfilling to their requirements as opposed to having nothing and remaining out of inconvenience like noncriminal individuals. Conceded there has been a lot of research done to make sense of what drives individuals to carry out wrongdoings, keep on doing the violations and what could really make them stop perpetrate

Here as well, an institutional problem particular to the U.S. has been an impediment for enacting smart renewable energy policies. Unlike Europe where the parliamentary systems allow the executives to have a majority of seats in the legislature branch, the U.S. system is known for being constantly governed by one party who controls one house of the U.S. Congress and the presidency and another party at the other house of Congress. This central schism in American politics has played an important role for national renewable energy policy because one party is generally opposed to government actions. Indeed, American politic history shows us how democrats generally seek to give cost-control power in the hands of centralized experts while Republicans are usually skeptical about experts ‘reliability.

In contrast, some believe that renewable energy is a key factor involved in helping the economy to grow. Many jobs are created in the manufacturing and running of renewable energy plants. The renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies created 8.5 million new jobs and $970 billion in revenue in the year 2006 (Langwith, “Renewable Energy is Economically”). The American Solar Energy Society says by 2030 it could generate up to $4.5 trillion in revenue for the U.S and create 40 million new jobs. This would represent one in every four jobs (Langwith, “Renewable Energy is Economically”). This shows how vital it is to get renewable energy companies in the U.S. It is important to build a stable economy again and do it all while helping the environment.

Throughout the United States, there is a plentiful array of renewable resources. To name a few, hydroelectric power, tidal, solar, wind, and biomass (SEAI). In respect to all types of renewable energy, the government provides incentives. Based on how much money is needed for other resources, the United States federal government should not substantially increase incentives for the use of renewable energy in the United States.

The renewable energy industry can be a very profitable market to enter and many different governments and business are investing in the industry. Renewable energy is a less expensive long term option and many developing counties have renewable energy sources that power their populations; whereas, develop counties do not have those same resources. The renewable energy industry will be more prominent by 2040.

Energy is a critical component for every economy and society around the world. Energy is divided into two groups, nonrenewable (coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear) with a finite amount found around the globe and renewable (hydro, tidal, solar, wind, geothermal, and biomass) that are constantly being replenished so that they will never run out (Green Energy Choice, 2011). The international economic impact of renewable energy is explored by examining subsidies, strategic policies, and comparative advantage of renewable energy.