Strategic Design At Dynacorp Corporation

The current strategic design of Dynacorp is the Functional Grouping structure with three major divisions such as engineering, manufacturing and marketing. My chosen design is front/back structure, and it addresses the problems faced by Dynacorp

Problems inside Dynacorp: When Dynacorp has changed its structure, there are problems of linkage and alignment in the light of Strategic Design Lens. According to the new structure, Research and Advanced Development Group and Business Units (BUs) are

As Dynacorp outgrew its functional structure it began to experience common disadvantages of such organizational types. These disadvantages include unresponsiveness to changes in the market and to customers. Restructuring to Front/Back revealed a structural disadvantage that is identical to the functional structure: poor integration between market needs and technology development. An additional disadvantage incurred due to the restructure was inadequate integration and synergy between the front and back ends.

According to Eustace (2003), we have witnessed a fundamental shift in the corporate value system away from physical and financial assets towards the creative exploitation of a nexus of intangible assets and competences- mainly in the form of distinctive capabilities derived from knowledge intangible. In the present are, the ‘intangible economy’ and there are four tips of resources ( knowledge assets, collaboration assets, engagement assets and time) from which economic activity and competitive advantage are primarily derived and delivered. Managing information and knowledge in high quality is not an easy task, but there are many reasons. The retention of its Research and Development center in the United Kingdom while its manufacturing plants will be in China and Malaysia will make it imperative for Dyson to consider using information resources and enterprise system to control and coordinate all its operations all over. Dyson will need many information technologies for guarantee the quantity and quality of information and for keeping the information flow is the major differentiator for every business (Gates 1999).

The following paper is about a company that is at the top level of their industry in selling their products and services. The background of this company describes about what kind of company this is and the types of products and services it provides to their customers. This section also includes the recent performance of this company and the varying aspects of what their target customers and whose is the competition.

Strategic linking at Dynacorp was to be accomplished, in the first instance, by linking development, manufacturing, and marketing within each Business Unit through a change in the formal reporting structure. Carl Greystone expressed his conviction that a “tremendous amount of progress” has been made since these changes were instituted and that his personnel are “thinking about the business in new terms…” Even Greystone, however, was forced to admit that his group had been “consistently behind plan in both revenue and profit” for the past year and a half and that the “Business Unit presidents have expressed some frustration with the performance of his group.” Martha Pauley, a Branch Manager in Greystone’s division who supervised six teams that “handle

and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of

Strategic planning can dictate the success of any organization if properly planned as well as the failure of an organization if not implemented as planned. Strategic planning is all about making choices. It is a process designed to support leaders in being intentional about their goals and methods. Simply stated, strategic planning is a management tool, and like any management tool, it is used for one purpose only—to help an organization do a better job. This portion of the strategic plan will explain why an

But Firstly, we will start this part by talking about the importance of a deep analysis of the industry’s structure. A deep knowledge of the industry the company is in, is extremely important. The industry structure is unique and varies from industry to industry of course. It will determine the level of competitiveness and attraction of the industry. With the Five Forces model (Porter) and PESTEL (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal) analysis, the organization will get a better understanding of the market will allow you to know the requirements for the possible creation of sustainable competitive advantages and take the right strategic decisions. According to Porter, to create an efficient competitive strategy, it is important to understand the rules of competition that determine market attractiveness.

Strategy formulation has been acknowledged as one of the most crucial factors of ensuring the long-term growth of the business. However, the manner in which strategy is formulated, and most importantly, the nature of the strategy chosen for the company determines its future position in the marketplace (Grant, 2005).

The organizations that will be discussed are Century 21 Powerhouse Realty where I am employed at as a real estate agent and the Disney organization, which is an organization that has adopted total quality management. In the following paragraphs I will evaluate my organization’s mission, vision, goals, and objectives as well as discuss the relationship

As we have seen strategies will provide to organizations a unique position in the market, making hard to our competitors to copy the competences achieved by those strategies differentiating us from them. Strategies also help organization to achieve the objectives in the long-term, focusing in not losing the core business, but what happen when the long term strategies are not supported by an action plan? What happen when the objectives are set without considering the resources and skills which the company will need to achieve them?

Kirkham’s strategy was to integrate the different systems of each division into an “all-inclusive” product and also to involve all the divisions together with regards to product development, instead of letting each division be responsible for just products within that division. Mr. Donaldson chose Kathleen Quinn, Vice-President of R&D, to be responsible for coordinating the development of new products. This proved to be quite a challenging task considering that each managing director (of each division) still retained responsibility for the turnover and profitability of their respective decisions and also for the strategies to achieve the goals of their divisions. In addition, regardless of the trend of their customers in purchasing integrated systems, the majority of each division’s turnover came from the sale of stand-alone products.

“Lean and mean,” cost structures while limited power of spending habits to lower level managers.

A need for growth in any organization to stay a viable entity must occur. Organizational change is inevitable. Just like anything in life, markets and cultures change which require constant attention and preparation. In order to be successful in any market, an organization has to be able transform itself to the needs for the market. CrysTel is no stranger to change. CrysTel is a telecommunication company with over 2500 employees and a gross income of approximately $200 million a year. Products included in there list of services include data cables, wireless solutions, and network development. The product profile is data cables, wireless solutions and network development. Because of the nature of