Strategic Management Pepsico 2008 Case Study

PepsiCo is one of the largest U.S based food and beverage companies. With a strong heritage. What is now, PepsiCo was first established in the late 1800’s. What started as a small one-man operation has grown into a food and beverage megabrand, with strong competition from both sectors of the food and beverage industry. With fierce competition from companies such as Coca-Cola, Kraft foods and ConAgra, PepsiCo must continue to innovate while providing customers with quality products that are priced competitively to remain relevant.

PepsiCo is driven by the competitive spirit of the market which they use it to provide solutions that would help their company as well as others.

Evaluate two (2) key changes in the selected company 's management style from the company 's inception to the current day. Indicate whether or not you believe the company is properly managed. Provide support for your position.

The net profit was $6,320 million in FY2010, an increase of 6.3% over 2009 ($5,946). As stated in the mission statement, they seek to produce financial rewards. With the numbers previously mentioned, we can see they have succeeded. This significant financial performance gives them the resources they need to provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to their employees, their business partners and the communities in which they operate and to invest in the four key areas (performance, human sustainability, environmental sustainability and talent sustainability) so they can reach their goals. (Yahoo Finance, 2011) 4. Conduct a competitive and marketing analysis of the organization to determine strengths and opportunities. PepsiCo is the largest snack and non-alcoholic drink producer in the United States, with 39% and 25% of the respective market shares. PepsiCo operates in over 200 countries, with its largest markets in North America and the United Kingdom. PepsiCo has three direct competitors, the Coca-Cola Company, Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, and Kraft Foods. Unlike its major competitor, Coca-Cola, the majority of PepsiCo 's revenues do not come from carbonated soft drinks. In fact, beverages account for less than 50% of total revenue. Additionally, over 60% of PepsiCo 's beverage sales come from its key noncarbonated brands like Gatorade and Tropicana. PepsiCo 's revenues

During the growth stage of the product life cycle, the Company has a plan to diversify to the additional major markets in other geographic locations as well as to introduce additional products in the markets. Hence, the company will face additional competition from the major brands such as Coca-Cola, Pepsi Foods, Dr. Peppers etc. to gain the market share. While Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are the market leaders, however due to the increased concern over high calorie and carbonated soda based drinks, the market share of the existing leaders are in

This case describes the complexity of PepsiCo's competitive position in the Mexican soft-drink market during the late 1990's. Between 1993 and 1996 PepsiCo and Coca-Cola waged a classic cola war in Latin America. The goal for both companies was to gain market share and by the end of 1996, Coca-Cola had clearly won the Latin America cola war. In 1993 PepsiCo enjoyed a 42% market share in Venezuela thanks to the success of its bottling partner, the Cisneros Group but by the end of 1996, PepsiCo held less than 1% of the Venezuelan cola market. Following PepsiCo's anchor bottler in Mexico, Gemex, the case details the strategies employed by PepsiCo's senior management beginning in 1993 to expand its

Pepsi Co 's assignment taken as a whole is to amplify the value of its shareholder 's investment through sales intensification, expenditure gearshift and prudent investment of resources (Bongiorno, 1996, p 71). In this pose, Pepsi believes that its moneymaking triumph depends on

Coca-Cola Company has realized significant growth since its establishment to become a global leader in the marketing, manufacturing, and distribution of syrup and soft drinks. Out of the four generic strategies, the company has followed the differentiation strategy to make its products unique in the market. Its interest is to maximize the market share through the development of the most innovative products and the establishment of effective strategies to influence the customer’s decisions. In such a way, the company has integrated various strategies to ensure that desirable results are attained in the market. Its strategic choices align with the differentiation strategy in an attempt to make its products unique and meet diverse market requirements. To reduce its weaknesses, the company should consider exploiting key opportunities in the market including venturing in the packaging of water, promotion of new brands, and launching of healthy products. In particular, the vision and mission statement of Coca-Cola seems to have reconfirmed and changed in this process of company’s strategic analysis.

PepsiCo’s corporate strategy had diversified, in 2008, the company into salty and sweet snacks, soft drinks, orange juice, bottled water, and ready-to-eat drink teas and coffees, purified and functional waters, isotonic beverages, hot and ready-to-eat breakfast cereals, grain-based products, and breakfast condiments. Strategies that kept their brands at the top were tied to new product innovation, close relationships with distribution allies, international expansion, and strategic acquisitions. A new element of PepsiCo’s corporate strategy was product reformulations to make snack

Strategic Alliance is the collaboration of two companies who came together to implement an idea that will benefit both parties (Strategic alliance, 2009). It is crucial that both parties understand what’s really at stake in order to make their partnership successful. In this paper, the writer took the time to analyze a partnership between Subway restaurants and Coca-Cola products. In addition, we will look at the economic benefit for each company. When dealing with businesses there is a potential for ups and downs during the operations process. The author will examine this collaboration between Subway and Coca-Cola while using Porter’s Five Forces framework including a PESTEL (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental and Legal) analysis of these two companies.

In year 1965, PepsiCo Inc. is founded by Donald M. Kendall and Herman Lay. PepsiCo Inc. was merged by Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay in 1965. PepsiCo is an American multination industry that selling food and beverage. PepsiCo Inc. is the second-largest organisation that produces food and beverage in the world.

In the case of PepsiCo, analyzing the non-alcoholic beverage industry using Porter’s Five Force Analysis allows for assessment and adjustment to the strategic plans implemented to sustain competitive advantage. Porter’s Five Forces model helps outline the competitiveness of the current market through analysis of the industry rivalry between companies, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitution, and the threat of new entries (Strategic Planning Tools, 2009). All of these forces affect not only a company but an industry. To begin, competitive rivalry within an industry analyzes the current competition within that market. When a market is competitive it “encourages companies to innovate, utilize production capacity, reduce costs and

PepsiCo is the second most popular beverage company in the world, according to PepsiCo (2008). This company has an outstanding marketing brand name. PepsiCo sponsors numerous sporting events and has a wide variety of consumers. This product is in competition with the first popular beverage company Coke-Cola. This company evaluates every year on a strategic plan by using SWOTT analysis to manage their products to learn the internal and external factors of the marketing business.

A strategic plan for PepsiCo North America is hereby proposed as follows for the geographical region of the national

Pepsi Co 's assignment taken as a whole is to amplify the value of its shareholder 's investment through sales intensification, expenditure gearshift and prudent investment of resources (Bongiorno, 1996, p 71). In this pose, Pepsi believes that its moneymaking triumph depends on providing safe and quality drink to its consumers and customers while adhering to the highest standards of truthfulness. Pepsi Co 's product portfolio encompasses sixteen labels that produce enough cash for the company. The most popular of these brands include Pepsi Cola, and Mountain Dew.