Strategies For A Better Manager

All situations are different and a leadership style applied in one situation will not always work in another. A leader must use judgement to decide the most appropriate style needed for each situation. The ‘Situational Approach’ to leadership identifies four leadership styles which are;

Contents Page Qualification structures Unit 5001 Unit 5002 Unit 5003 Unit 5004 Unit 5005 Unit 5006 Unit 5007 Unit 5008 Unit 5009 Unit 5010 Unit 5011 Unit 5012 Unit 5013 Personal development as a manager and leader Information based decision making Performance management Resource management Meeting stakeholder and quality needs Conducting a management project Financial control Marketing planning Project development and control Human resource development Managing recruitment and selection Being a leader Leadership practice 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

This following will outline my personal leadership practices and potential future leadership. To analyze my leadership qualities I will use the Seven Habits Profile and a leadership theory to determine my strengths, weaknesses, and areas of opportunity for improvement. In conclusion, I will determine the best recommendations for long-term improvement as well as SMART goals, or short-term courses of action, for leadership improvement.

This necessitates situational leadership approach to be adopted by successful leaders as they adjust their leadership style to deal with particular circumstances. For instance, circumstances deemed straightforward or complex would best be dealt with using task-orientated approach such as transactional leadership (Crevani et al, 2010).

As a leader, we make several decisions throughout a day and interact with several different individuals, who require different types of attention and have different needs. To be an effective leader throughout an organization, you must take several approaches to leadership, depending on the individuals involved, the situation at hand, and the legal or ethical thing to do. There are three popular approaches to leadership to consider during these times; situational leadership, transformational leadership, and charismatic leadership. Understanding these approaches helps to narrow down and determine what type of leader you are and to help a leader understand how to implement these principles during their leadership. These approaches are essential to understanding leadership and help to ease the decision making process that we are faced with all too often.

When allowing each group member to see the team’s development one will increase the knowledge of each other. A vigorous working group will create a leader within a team. Any group role one takes is important. However, the role of an effective leader is special and somewhat challenging in a group. The leader role of a team can be given as a title or be earned and the person that is an expert on the subject matter. Regardless of how one got to be a leader, the person will be strategically looking at the glide path of the goal. Mobilizing a team to achieve its goal is somewhat difficult if the leader is not an effective listener, good confident, and has an assertive consistent behavior. Brown author of An Experiential Approach

The fundamental underpinning of the Situational Leadership Model is that there is no single "best" style of leadership. Effective leadership is task-relevant, and the most successful leaders are those who adapt their leadership style to the Performance Readiness (ability and willingness) of the individual or group they are attempting to lead or influence. Effective leadership varies, not only with the person or group that is being influenced, but it also depends on the task, job or function that needs to be accomplished.

Situational Leadership states that there is no one best leadership style for all situation. Rather, the leadership style that is best for a particular situation depends on the skill set and attitude of the employee. A tool used by leaders is the Situational Leadership® II Model which is divided into two parts; one with four leadership styles and the other with four development levels. The top portion of the model shows four leadership styles; Style 1 (Directing), Style 2 (Coaching), Style 3 (Supporting), and Style 4 (Delegating). These leadership styles correspond with the four development levels—D1, D2, D3, and D4—which will be explained in more detail below. Blanchard Companies, K. (2016).

Since there is no special or one precise type of leader, numerous leadership styles and theories have surfaced. This is because a different situations require different type of leadership styles. In many occasions, leadership theories help to predict the best leadership style to employ in a particular situation. This essay seeks explain why situational leadership theory is useful and relevant in developing an effective leadership culture. It is this writers hope that it can be used as a how to guide to enable managers to be more successful.

Today, project managers are to focus on situational leadership, which is known to be effective in project management. Situational leadership refers to when the leader of the project must adjust his style of leadership to the team members’ personalities. Situational leader is known to be effective in project management. It is important for leaders to focus on their behavior towards the team, such as “tolerance of external events and tolerance of people’s personalities.” (378). There have been managers that had to change their leadership style from traditional to situational leadership to lead their team to success. To be successful, it is a mixture of a person’s experience and personality with his or her style of leadership.

I have had a total of 6 managers over the course of 21 years. By now I have a very solid idea of which qualities a good manager should possess. I have run from one extreme to the other, my worst manager was fired for stealing, and my best manager has been promoted 4 times since I last worked there, and is an outstanding asset to the company.

The Situational Leadership Model recommends that there is no "one size fits all" methodology to authority. Contingent upon the circumstance, changing levels of authority and administration are fundamental. Nonetheless, leaders should first recognize their generally critical assignments or needs. Second, leaders must consider the status level of their adherents by breaking down the employee 's capacity and ability. Contingent upon the level of these variables, leaders must apply the most proper initiative style to fit the given: Directing, coaching, supporting and delegating. Situational leadership is important for numerous reasons. Leaders are good examples the impact on the way of life, qualities, musings and

One of those ways is situational leadership, a theory first proposed by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard in the “Training and Development Journal” in 1969. They viewed traditional leadership as one side no longer fits every situation. Situational leadership his was designed to address the dilemma of matching managers to proper job based on maturity and leadership skills. Blanchard and Hersey theorized that various situations called for different types of leadership. In order to be successful, a leader has to be able to adapt to those different situations (Northouse, p.99). Situational leadership has four leadership styles that help influence the subordinates. A leaders decisions are based on the ability and motivation of his or her subordinates, ranging from highly motivated and hi skill to low motivation and low skill. The graph below demonstrates this.

Congratulations, you’ve just become a manager for the first time! This is an exciting time in your career and you want to do the best job you can. You probably already have a mental list of what you want to do differently from your own past managers, as well as traits you aspire to develop in your own role as leader. Read these essential tips for improving your managerial game.

Managers rely on four basic functions to accomplish a complete team performance. Those basic functions are planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. Planning is when the manager sits down with his/her group and collectively they set their goals and decide how as a team they will accomplish these goals. One efficient way to implement the planning function is silent suggestion box type systems when you have each person in the group write down what they believe the goal is and include each goal into a big attainable goal. Organizing is the process of arranging the team tasks, people, and resources to accomplish the work efficiently. Enacting this step is quite easy one must get to know each member of the group including their strengths and weaknesses inside and out of the classroom and allocate tasks based on their strengths in order to boost morale and confidence. When the manager motivates the team members in order to achieve the organization/team goals is the Leading function. Leading is more of a skill you are born with but a way to accomplish this task is through studying great leaders in sports or on business teams for inspirational tips. The final step and probably the most crucial one is Controlling, that is when the manager monitors the group’s performance and individual performance and compares it with the organizations goals and if corrective action is needed then the manager must put the organization