Strategies for Linking Theoretical Framework and Research Types

If I was doing this study, my hypothesis would be that “people, who receive an aversive stimulus every time they give an incorrect answer, will try harder to get the correct answer than those who do not receive anything”. My independent variables, which are the variables that researcher manipulates, would be the electric shocks and the emotional motivation; and my dependent variable, which is the variable that is tested and measured, would be the members’ results.

Assignment:- Values and Weaknesses of the secondary research and How primary research supplements secondary research

Method: The type of article would be an empirical study. The purpose of the study was to examine

1. The researchers analyzed the data they collected as though it were at what level of measurement?

The mean severity for renal disease for the research subjects is increased after the treatment in both the experimental and control group but there is only a slight increase in the mean value for control group which does not seem significant. If we look at the overall mean score of baseline and posttest we can say that the posttest mean score is increased with

Using Northcentral University (NCU) Dissertation Center, a student could access several resources to guide them through the rigorous process of developing a research topic, develop a research question, gathering information to examine the research question(s) and develop a hypothesis all the way to guidelines for submitting a dissertation for review. For this paper the NCU Concept Paper Template will be examined for its instructions on how to detail research methods for quantitative and qualitative studies.

Define and explain research and define and explain the scientific method (include an explanation of all five steps). Proper

1. The researchers analyzed the data they collected as though it were at what level of measurement?

Once I had chosen the primary research I wanted to include, I began to summarise each piece of research, this allowed me to identify key factors of each piece of research such as; principle findings, sample, design, data collection and data analysis of each piece of research. This information allowed me to develop the research matrix (Appendix 2). The matrix is a table which allows the research to be broken down into different categories and allows me to compare the various pieces of

Level II includes all the systematic review that are quasi-experimental studies. These researches might be with or without

1.The researchers analyzed the data they collected as though it were at what level of measurement?

This article is good because it is short and explains things that would be useful in this research. The article gives the actual wording of

The answer can be found in Section 1.2 Section Title “The Cumulative, Ongoing, and Critical Nature of Research.”

environment. In terms of what hypothesis the study was trying to support, it seemed to mainly

Before one can begin their research, they have to decide what it is they are going to be getting a deeper understanding on. This all starts with a theory. A theory is an observation of someone or something that the researcher wishes to further expand their knowledge upon. Once it has been established what will be studied, a well thought out hypothesis must be formulated. A hypothesis is an if-then statement, where if represents the particular behavior being observed and the then is acting as the result of the behavior being observed. Now, the experimenter must write up what is called an operational definition. This is a way in which future researchers can accurately replicate (which means to perform the same experiment and get the same result) the experiment. Once all of these steps have been carefully