When talking about strategy, most people simply associate it with a long term direction and plan. In fact, the components and development of strategy are far more diversified and complicated than people normally imaged. In this essay, by an review and evaluation of different approaches to strategy, it critically discuss the current debates of different approaches and discuss whether the definition of Chandler(1962) is appropriate to apply to the organization today. Within 1960-1980,the planning approach from the business historian Chandler(1962), and the organizations like , consulting group Mc Kinsey and BCG has significantly reflected in the definition of Chandler (1962). Chandler (1962) formed a formal approach called Multi-divisional …show more content…
Within 1980-90s, The direction of the approaches has changed from corporative planning to strategic thinking with competitive advantage, a way to focus on the performance and profitability. The reason behind is that the unstable economic environment such as the growing influences of Asian markets and oil price rise issues force the need of the competitive advantage. In the view of Michael Porter(1980, 1985), it is essential to define the attractiveness of industries and sectors, their potential changes, successful strategic groups, valuable market segments, threats and opportunities in the marketplace. Through Porter Five Force analysis, it can reflect that how external factors including suppliers, customers, new entrants and threat of substitute affect company competitiveness in the long term, which can be seen as another form of external analysis and thus adopt to the course of action. On the other hand, another approach called Resources-based view ( Prahalad and Hamel , 1990,Grand 1991) ,which lay stress on the internal analysis of the firm to achieve competitive advantages rather than focusing on external environment. Resources-Based View takes the view that managers can completely understand the kinds of resources that can generate sustained strategic advantages through evaluating the full range of resources the firm may possess, and then
There are a gazillion companies out there, but some stand out. Whether it is because of their popularity, affiliations, history, profile or service, one factor simply makes or breaks a company; it’s strategy management process.
In 1980 and later in 1985 Michael Porter wrote two books. First one is “Competitive Strategy” and the second one is “Competitive Advantage” which are emphasized in explaining strategies which guides companies through analyzing themselves in their industries and by that analysis he guides them to choose the best strategy in order to be successful and achieve sustain competitive advantage their existing market. This paper focus on two of Porter's strategies that are “Five Force Analysis” and “Generic Strategies”. These strategies are still using by some of the company, but they are started to be replaced by new approaches. They became outdated for today’s highly competitive marketplace because they only focus on competing in existing market. In 2005, W. Chan Kim and
There has been a large amount of research into what strategy is, since Michael Porter’s perennial work in the 1980s. Studies done on the execution of strategy have been far less numerous. However, there is one major understanding about the execution of strategy. The execution of strategy is a vital part of success in business. A summary of many myths surrounding various strategic executions will be outlined, along with their subsequent analyses.
Strategy is a set of complicated tactics formulated by the executives of a company directed towards the achievement of company’s goal (Salmela, 2002). It is about all the path ways that a company would follow to reach its ultimate goal. It is a company’s strategy which helps to identify what it does better than the other companies in the industries, which may be different from what it does best. For successful strategy formulation and implementation, a company should know the needs of customers and should have knowledge of its competitors. Through a good strategy a company would identify that opportunity which makes it different from the others (Thompson, 2005).
Porter’s Five Forces was developed in 1979 by Michael Porter as a framework to assess and evaluate the competitive position of a company in an industry. It is based on the theory that there are five forces which identify the attractiveness and competitive strength of an industry. It is helpful to gain an understanding of a firm’s current positon and the position that the firm may look to capture in the future. Porter’s five forces are also used to
Chandler (1977) believes strategy is about using the necessary recourses so the organizations are able to carry out their long-term goals and aims. Which relates to Johnson (1987, pp. 4-5) who states, “Strategic decisions occur at many levels of managerial activity and will be concerned with the long-term direction”.
Strategy formulation has been acknowledged as one of the most crucial factors of ensuring the long-term growth of the business. However, the manner in which strategy is formulated, and most importantly, the nature of the strategy chosen for the company determines its future position in the marketplace (Grant, 2005).
This paper begins with a summary view to develop the concept of strategy and why its implementation is difficult. The following sections then cover the core discussion of this paper to support the aforementioned
In his article “The five competitive forces that shape strategy“, Michael Porter (2008) updates and extends his “five forces” framework he first introduced in 1979 and which has influenced the academic and business research for decades. He reaffirms that “THREAT OF ENTRY”, “THE POWER OF SUPPLIERS”, “THE POWER OF BUYERS”, THE THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES”, and “RIVALRY AMONG EXISTING COMPETITORS” are the forces that shape every single industry, and a thorough understanding of such forces help analyze everything from the intensity of competition to the profitability and attractiveness of any industry. The framework has two dimensions; the vertical dimension that connects
An organisation’s strategy plays an important role of providing direction of where company wants to be and how best to allocate the company’s resources to meet its objectives. The formulation of business strategies has evolved over the years and has been made more difficult in recent by the uncertain operating environments and global financial crises.
Porter’s Five Forces Model is one of the most used tools to analyze an industry and help to develop a business strategy. Michael E Porter introduced the model in 1979, and published by Harvard Business Review under the name “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy”. The model uses five forces that have been identified to categorize an industry as intensely competitive or not competitive at all and this will then determine the attractiveness of the market. An attractive industry with high profits will have high barriers to entry, weak supplier and buyer bargaining power, few substitute products and low competition. An unattractive industry will have the mirror image. Usually there are not these two outcomes of a porters five forces analysis.
Alfred Chandler(1963) defines strategy as ‘ the determination of the long-run goals and objectives of an enterprise and the adoption of courses of action of an enterprise and the adoption of courses of action and the allocation of resources necessary for carrying out these goals’. And Michael porter(1996) sees it as ‘Competitive strategy is about being different. It means deliberately choosing different set of activities to deliver a unique mix of value’.
Strategy can be defined as being different from one’s competitors, finding the race to operate and accomplished it. According to Michael Porter (1996), while becoming better at what you do is desirable, it will not benefit you in the long run because it is something other competitors can also do. Strategies for organizations are originally developed by Michael E. Porter in 1979 by introducing the five forces model. A company can identify the industry profitability and attractiveness by analyzing the five forces of Porter (Johnson et al., 2008). And then a reasonable strategy can be set up in line with the strengths and the weakness of an organization is able to create a plan for a stronger position for the organization within its
Porter’s five forces analysis not only provides the ideas to create the strategic plan but also assesses the attractiveness of an industry.
A strategy, according to Robbins and Barnwell (2002, p. 139) is “the adoption of courses of action and the allocation of resources necessary to achieve the organisation’s goals”.