The third strength demonstrated is my charismatic attitude. Since having charisma is part of my personality, it enables me to be energetic and inspire others. In addition, by being self-confident and having an optimistic outlook, positive influence and trust ensue. “Charisma is the most important in transformational leader influence” (Rolfe, 2011). Occasionally, coworkers have complimented me on my magnetic and uplifting personality. Being charismatic consists of “intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation, and individual consideration. Leaders who employ these behaviors and develop emotional bonds with followers are then perceived as charismatic” (Humphreys, 2005). This is beneficial to my leadership practice because my coworkers find me approachable and kind. Asking questions and evoking opinions are encouraged, which, in turn, enables teamwork and open lines of communication. Ultimately, my goal is to make a significant impact in the lives of my coworkers as well as the organization.
Personal Leadership Weaknesses
There are a few weaknesses that are associated with my leadership style. The first weakness is not taking enough time to fully know and understand my subordinates. It is easy to get caught up in the hustle and bustle of the busy workplace. Unfortunately, overlooking the needs and wants of staff can sometimes happen. I need to be vigilant and take extra time out of my day to really listen and connect with the staff on a professional and
This reflective essay is based on my strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities (SWOT) analysis (Appendix 1) in order to examine my leadership skills. Leadership is one of the essential component in nursing since all nurses are expected to demonstrate effective leadership skills to ensure patient’s well-being is protected and improve their experiences while receiving the care (Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) (2015). Firstly, leadership will be defined within the context of the NHS and particularly nursing. Furthermore, some of the current health issues and challenges faced by health care practice that are related to poor leadership will be discussed. The essay will be continued by exploring various relevant leadership theories in relation to nursing practice and working within the Multi-Disciplinary Teams (MDTs). Lastly, as mentioned earlier, I will also be reflecting on my strengths and weaknesses from practice, then develop a SMART (Specific, measureable, achievable, realistic and time-bound) action plan to improve my leadership skills which will be followed by a brief conclusion.
All leaders have strengths as well as weaknesses, I am no different. There are several disadvantages to being a transactional leader including not giving out adequate praises. I only praise coworkers for exemplary work. I
By taking the Seven Habits Profile I was able to identify some of the leadership weaknesses I see in myself. These weaknesses include how stress affects my behavior, a lack of creativity, and how my perception influences my leadership.
In the previous weeks, I have demonstrated charismatic practices by being visionary, strategic, emotionally expressive and warm, and had effective communication skills. As a
A reason that this country works well is that everyone has diverse abilities which can contribute to everyday life. Some people let those abilities shine at work, in their personal life or both. As people have their strengths, they also have their weaknesses. There is a problem to improve those weaknesses when the weakness is not identified. Once the weak point is identified it needs to be resolved. A plan of action for improvement helps in solving the situation. In this paper, I will identify abilities and skills that I possess that contribute positively in my work environment, in my personal life, and in my learning team. I will also identify personal areas that need improvement, and outline a plan of
Antonakis, J., Fenley, M., & Liechti, S. (2011). Can Charisma Be Taught? Tests of Two Interventions. Academy Of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 374-396. Antonakis et al starts off research by posing a question. “Can leadership, and in particular charisma, be taught? The authors set out to prove in fact that training can training managers a specific set of charismatic leadership tactics not only improves their charisma, but their effectiveness as leaders. Charismatic leadership is defined as by Antonakis et al as being a sub element of transformational leadership. In the first study researchers assigned 34 middle managers from a Swiss company into two groups randomly. One group received training in charisma and the others received no training. The group receiving training were trained in principles on charismatic leadership. In the second study focused on 41 MBA students enrolled in a leadership course at a Swiss public university monitor charismatic leadership. The students were videotaped giving a 4 minute speech addressing problems within the company while also giving a plan of action to staff. After, speech was done, each participant received training in charismatic leadership and was asked to deliver the same speech 6 weeks later by videotape. Results reveal that improvement and effectiveness as a leader were made in both research groups. This study concluded that feedback is important to the growth and development of leaders and must be provided to
Effective leaders demonstrate certain behavioral traits that differentiate themselves from others. The traits that make Helen Frye an effective leader include charisma and emotional intelligence. First, charismatic leaders have magnetic personalities. They are able to use their personality and interpersonal skills to persuade others. According to Ronald E Riggio, Ph.D (2012), “charismatic leaders are essentially very skilled communicators – individuals who are both verbally eloquent, but also able to communicate to followers on a deep, emotional level” (para. 2). Frye demonstrates her charismatic leadership style be developing close relationships with her employees. Moreover, she describes her communication style as open vs. closed. She learns what motivates her employees and how they prefer to be acknowledged or rewarded for their performance. In addition, she encourages her employees provide feedback or ideas that can benefit the customer or company. She establishes a rapport with her employees that inspires and motivates her employees to exceed company objectives.
Choi (2006) enumerates the three “core components” of charismatic leadership: envisioning, empathy, and empowerment and notes that these three are “evident in the [leader’s] interactions with followers” (p. 26). Another vital part of the charismatic leader’s “bag of tricks” is his or her ability to communicate. Inspirational speeches have a way of stirring followers and affixing the ideas of the leader in the minds of the followers. For example, few can forget Ronald Reagan’s stirring speech, “Mr. Gorbachev tear down this wall” or Martin Luther King’s inimitable “I have a dream.” Bryman (1992) contends that the ability to speak plays a large role in the formation of charisma (as cited in Tan & Wee, 2002). Research suggests that a charismatic leader projects “a powerful, confident, and dynamic presence” through his or her rhetoric and the way in which it is delivered (Tan & Wee, 2002, p. 318). The rhetorical ability of the charismatic leader is the method by which he or she is able to make the three core components effective.
Many great leaders have one thing in common and that is charisma. Charismatic leaders are those that have the capability to inspire and encourage people to do more than they would normally do, despite obstacles and personal sacrifice. (Daft, R.L, pg. 364) Charisma is what provokes energy and commitment out of its followers. These leaders possess the power to motivate their followers to do almost anything. They create an atmosphere of change and express an ideal vision of a better future. The most common characteristics of the charismatic leader involve maturity, communication, humility, and inspiration. These unique qualities impact their followers and conduct themselves in such a way that allows for remarkable results. Then
Before one can lead others, they must learn to lead themselves. The first step to developing your leadership abilities is identifying your strengths and weaknesses. A few of my personal strengths are, integrity, problem solving, and vision. Some of my weaknesses are priorities, decision making, and most importantly, influence.
Charisma theory is described as a “gift”, or a unique superiority of an individual character. This is set by an advantage of which the individual is set apart from the common man and treated as a gem with supremacies (Charismatic vs. Transformational, 2011). Whereas the transformational theory is defined as leaders who enthuse followers to use their own egocentricities to benefit the organization (Charismatic vs. Transformational, 2011). These leaders also possess a gift of having a
Charisma is a trait that is mainly found in leaders whose personalities are basically characterized by magnetism or attractiveness, personal charm, innate and sophisticated abilities of persuasion and interpersonal communication. A charismatic leader is therefore an individual leader who demonstrates a high level of charisma. They have the ability to influence people because of their high level of competence, skills, ability and knowledge. A charismatic leader’s exceptional personal qualities enable their employees to be loyal and obedient to them. They use a range of methods to maintain their image and to win trust from the followers. Some of the methods include; self-sacrifice- having great
In charismatic leadership many employees draws perception that the leader is serving her or himself to achieve the goals and do not have enough thought towards the employees intentions (Frost, 2017). In order to be a charismatic leader, individual should work too much to make the employees understand regarding the best intentions, and in this situation having only charisma is not considered enough to influence. Many times employees gets the perception that a charismatic leader serves only him or her and actually do not care about the employees or company’s welfare (Frost,
Charismatic authority is often envied when its’ embodiment is seen in real life. Conley explains Max Weber's point of view that those who possess this type of authority are thought to do so naturally and with ease (Conley 577). Many spot this type of authority from a mile away, welcoming it into their lives. Whether this be at work, with a manager who you can help but admire and respect because of their ability to seem to work hard and lead gracefully, to the fellow student who leads a group project in a way that makes the team collaborative and causes the project itself to have a sense of ease to it. Conley points out that charismatic authority has its own place in politics, explaining that there are statistics that show “no amount of campaign money will help a candidate win an election if the electorate just doesn't like him or her” (578). Along with the previous ideas, it is important to know that charismatic authority is the most “difficult to maintain or pass on” (578). The reason for this is clear: while charisma can be learned, those who have it naturally will
Charismatic leaders appear confident about their proposals and do not appear doubtful and confused. The leader must communicate self-confidence so that the theory is attributed to expertise. The confidence and enthusiasm is contagious and the workers will work harder -