Strengths And Weaknesses Of Group Analysis

The forming stage is characterized by dependency, and need for acceptance and guidance. In this stage the "meet and greet" is done. During the meet and greet each member gathers information that will determine the strength of potential relationships amongst group members, as well as establish group hierarchy. Generally, in this stage the leader of group is selected. The group leader has a tendency to be someone that is viewed as stable and

The forming and orientation stage of the group is the initial step of getting the group started. Gladding (2012) outlines seven steps that make up the forming stage of group development. First, one must develop a basis for the group.

Whether groups are formed for social or task oriented purposes, the ability to produce and maintain a sense of affiliation, peer support and collaboration is important for overall group functioning. The cohesion of a social group is produced through the establishment of a set of group norms, which are later defined as a guide for conduct accepted within a group of individuals. However, in order for a group to perform and produce results, the team leader should guide his/her team through the proper stages of group development, which includes the following steps: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. Although teams should follow all these stages of group development, the forming and the norming stages are the most important,

A non-equivalent comparison group design will be used. The design is considered a quasi-experimental design, which attempts to control for threats to internal validity (Rubin & Babbie, 2014). This design has strengths and limitations. A strength of the design is that the data can be easily collected before and after participants have completed treatment, as the design allows for a pre-test and a post-test. Results can be easily collected to explain whether treatment is effective among court-mandated offenders who have completed the programs without relapse and, consequentially, if court-mandated treatment is more effective than voluntary participation in treatment. The nonequivalent comparison group design

The leader should provide appropriate emotions and empathy but also advocate for those involved to know what has happened (Shulman, 2012). This is a very important step because it will stop a lot of rumors. Even when group members do not want to talk about it, the leader should try to help discuss those feelings instead of hiding them and allowing them to fester (Shulman, 2012).

The five stages of developing groups is an important part of the position. In many cases it is the relationships that a person will have with other individuals who will determine the best members to put into the different groups. As well, the different skill sets that individuals have are also an important part in placing group members together. The observation of the first groups placed together will be a good gauge in learning how some of the individuals work and observing how others work well together. The group size should be eight to 10 people to facilitate greater ease of equal participation among the individuals.

As Wheelan (2013) explains, it is the team leader’s responsibility during stage one to establish defined goals and to identify specific team member roles and how they will contribute to the overall plan. This error on my part led to confusion, frustration, and unfortunately the departure of some of the youth volunteers, as they did not feel that the value of their input was considered nor was a clear picture of what our purpose was explained.

Stage one of his model is the Forming stage, where the leader must be prepared to answer many questions about the team’s purpose and objectives. Usual team processes are often ignored and there is also a high dependence on

In some of the other activities, I was working as a member however, I have to take control of the situation as I built a general understanding of the group work and do take leadership role in the group whenever required. (Belbin, 2010, pp 65)(Henny, 2008, pp501)

Trust may be a major issue during the group process. Since the members are female middle school students, the likelihood of them previously being betrayed by a trusted friend is great. It may be difficult for members to trust each other when disclosing personal information. Another issue that may arise is shame. The girls may not fully self-disclose because they are ashamed about the negative self-concept they have of themselves. It also may be difficult to say these negative thoughts about themselves out loud to other people. Hopefully, the fact that they all have some perception of themselves will aid in enabling them to self-disclose with confidence.

An important part of our learning and growing experience must stem from our ability to analyze and reflect upon the groups that we have been members in. This reflection can define our understanding of the weaknesses both in ourselves and in the others within our group; and it can help to shape the way that we act in future groups. Adjusting ourselves to compensate for our weaknesses, based upon an honest and thorough examination of our actions within a group setting, is one of most important thing for any person to do. It is only through this evaluation that we can improve ourselves and our interactions with others. This paper will examine a group that was required to make an important decision about adding a new member

The group interactions between those new in the group and those who were in later stages of the program were interesting to note. The interaction was almost that of an educational one between the two and members from later stages effectively encouraged those new to the group or those who failed, one which was on the first stage. A balanced dynamic and showed the positive aspects of an open group format. Individuals from varying stages interact in the group setting providing an environment that shows progression through struggles. Also, this assists in clients who believe their situations are unique and thus feeling alone the ability to connect with another member who had similar structures but are now on step eleven, these similarities provide

The therapist started the session by welcoming everyone to the first group “together.” He continued by explaining the purpose of the group. The therapist broke the ice by stating that the first session is about “getting to know each other, to figure out why we’re here in the room so we can prepare for future meetings.” I like that the therapist placed emphasis on “we” instead of referring to the members, it is important to note that he is part of the process too. Noticeably, while providing members with information, his eyes moved from one member to another in the room. Eye-contact is an important non-verbal skill in group therapy because it keeps the group members engaged. Don’t get me wrong, most of the time it can be awkward or pressuring but in this video’s case all the members were staring right back at the therapist.

In groups self disclosure can bring a sense of belonging among participants and it can create a sense of trust. I believe that many people just want be understood, therefore self disclosure is a good way to gain trust and create friendships. In my opinion self disclosure among participants can create a better group dynamic as there will be more cohesion among the group members. I personally noticed this in my group, I find myself knowing each members name and wanting to know more about each person in the group. I also noticed group cohesion during the AA meeting I attended. The group had a positive dynamic as the members listened to each other and self disclosed. Although intimacy can be a positive thing among groups, it can also become a problem as people have different personalities and beliefs about forming friendships. The way self disclosure might intervene in group process could be by forming groups and leaving other members feeling left out. In group discussion I noticed that several of my classmates would roll their eyes when a particular person asked

The Woodson foundation needs to understand all five stages in order to be successful. The stages are a useful framework for understanding group development (274). If they understand the five stages they eventually achieve their goal. Each stage plays an important role in the project. A understand of these stages promotes cohesiveness and measures progression. Once they look back from stage 5 to stages 1&2 they realize how the differences became similarities for the common goal.