Strengths And Weaknesses Of Nissan

Toyota was thought to be the best quality car in the 1970s and 1980s but, due to Japanese competition, American car manufactures soon began to close the rankings gap. At the top of their game in 2010, Toyota had to stop manufacturing and order a large recall of automobiles. While leadership was probably considered great at the height of Toyota’s success, changes were obviously needed during the recall period and management needed to be as adaptable to those changing conditions. The only thing regarded as permanent in a market economy is change

The goal of this consulting report is to analyze the strategy for General Motors. To start, a five forces analysis of the automobile industry was conducted. The five forces include the following factors: competition among rivals, threat of new entrants, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and role of complements. Understanding the influence of each of these factors provides insight into the attractiveness of the automobile industry. Such an understanding is necessary for an effective critique of General Motors’ strategy for the future.

Another key strength would be its staff. The company was able to draw from a talented and experienced pool of workers within the automotive industry. This was made possible due to the concentration of automotive suppliers located within the Rio Grande Valley both within the United States and Mexico. The company is able to draw from the employee’s vast experience allowing the company

Strengths: Strong vehicles (195 horsepower, strong metal), most serious 4x4. You can ride them off-road as well drive up steep hills, rough terrain obstacles, and even drive it through shallow water. They have central tire inflation systems. Strong marketing (Excelling in print, outdoor, TV, online media and public relations in addition to being innovative in our creative thinking are what made GM campaign successful, and consequently taking home such prestigious awards. Also segmentation, targeting, positioning are strength you can rely on.

It only focus on high end and performance market segment initially, so R&D, marketing activities are more effective than other companies with its competitive advantage in High-Tech product.

This is a case study analysis on Nissan Canada Inc. (NCI) and its plan to move from a “make to stock” to a “make to order” process and the implementation of NCI’s Integrated Customer Ordering Network (ICON). Involved in the implementation of ICON, NCI is faced with several challenges in the conversion of its outdated ordering process to Manugistics, an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. (Hunter, 2007)

The advantages of the Japanese automakers where known for the quality of all their automotive products and for the efficiency of their streamlined manufacturing and supply process. The disadvantages where they did not have an contingency plan.

They are well-positioned in some key markets. They’ve established a foothold in North America. They have a big presence and are a player in markets all over the world (except Asia). The cars are more reliable than ever before, yet still manage to be engaging and more fun than some of the competition and most owners are satisfied. Their new engines are renowned and studied and copied by other makers as they really do point a way into an ever more frugal future.

After the 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami that hit Japan, Nissan was able to recover faster than other leading automobile manufactures, such as Toyota and Honda. Nissan was able to recover so quickly because the company had a crisis plan already in place, which involved international connections, relationships and deals with suppliers. In this essay, Nissan’s operation management functions will be discussed, in addition to the critical path method (CPM) and the program evaluation and review technique (PERT) and how these methods can be fused with the company’s project management.

Huge brand equity and one of the biggest players in the two wheelers Indian market

It has made its name in the global market and has given a good competition to other companies in automobile sector.

Toyota was the pinnacle of quality in the 1990’s. Their use of “lean production” focused on eliminating waste and non-value added steps. This provided a competitive advantage surrounding cost and quality (Harmon, 2012). Toyota was viewed as a stable company by which investors could realize positive returns. In 2009 this pattern of stability was challenged. These challenges affected the overall brand value. Table 1 outlines the historical pricing of Toyota’s stock (TM) and associated market capitalization using close out prices from the end of each fiscal year.

Nissan focuses on maximizing its auto manufacturing operations through flexibility and efficiencies by maintaining a

Along with other Japanese manufacturers, Nissan was successfully competing on quality, reliability and fuel efficiency. By 1991, Nissan was operating very profitably, producing four of the top ten cars in the world.Nissan management throughout the 1990s, however, had displayed a tendency to emphasize short term market share growth, rather than profitability or long-term strategic success. Nissan was very well known for its advanced engineering and technology, plant productivity, and quality management. During the previous decade, Nissan’s designs had not reflected customer opinion because they assumed that most customers preferred to buy good quality cars rather than stylish, innovative cars. Instead of reinvesting in new product designs as other competitors did, Nissan managers seemed content to continue to harvest the success of proven designs. They tended to put retained earnings into equity of other companies, often suppliers, and into real-estate investments, as part of the Japanese business custom of keiretsu investing. Through these equity stakes in other companies, Ghosn’s predecessors (and Japanese business leaders in general) believed that loyalty and cooperation were fostered between members of the value chain within their keiretsu.

Toyota is a key player in global automotive market. Its structure constitutes if various production plants in different locations and a very strong branding which helps it capture a major market share. Like other enterprises, Toyota has several strengths and weakness which makes it what it is now. Toyota heavily invests in Research and development which helps it come up reputable product line which is spread out throughout the world because of its strengthening global distribution network however its recent product recalling, loose grip in key geographic areas and wrong allocation of resources shows that even a strong brand like Toyota has its weaknesses.