Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Cs Literature

Apologies it is slightly late. I’ve been trying to upload this and even attach as an email. I’ve had to use an entirely different computer to do this.

Lyubomirsky focuses on social psychology and the “development of ‘sustainable’ happiness” (179). She brings the idea of genetics into happiness and different aspects of happiness. She determines that there are three factors to happiness, and she also has a Subjective Happiness Scale to measure happiness. According to Lyubomirsky, the three aspects of happiness are

Personal Character traits can help you grow as a person because with good character by you just being nice to someone you could make their day, and seeing them happy can make you feel

In his book “Happier”, Tal Ben-Shahar talks about what happiness is, and the significant components of a happy life form chapter one to chapter five. Firstly, he uses the championship event to explain that happiness is not just a simple thing. He won the contest, but the happiness did not last, and disappeared quickly. Therefore, he began to research to figure out what happiness is. Moreover, he discusses people’s usual models for happiness. He also demonstrates the importance of pleasure and essential of meaning about happiness as well as other factors such as quantity and quality. Furthermore, he claims that happiness is the ultimate currency for people by discussing the relationship between wealth and happiness. Lastly, he advises people what attitude they should have, and how they should set their goals in order to pursue happiness. In the first part of Ben-Shahar’s book “Happier”, there are three important

Many readers assumingly agree with what Paul Tough calls “the cognitive hypothesis”: the belief “that success today depends primarily on cognitive skills – the kind of intelligence that gets measured on I.Q. tests, including the abilities to recognize letters and words, to calculate, to detect patterns – and that the best way to develop these skills is to practice them as much as possible, beginning as early as possible” (p. xiii). Tough is determined to exchange this cognitive theory with the character hypothesis: the idea that character traits such as self-control, conscientiousness, persistence, and self-confidence are more critical to achieving

Donald O. Clifton 1924-2003 is the inventor of the Clifton StrenghtsFinder (CSF) and is recognized as the Father of Strengths-Based Psychology by an American Association Presidential Commendation. In 1998, the Father of Strengths Psychology, Donald O. Clifton, along with Tom Rath and a team of scientists at Gallup, created the online StrenghtsFinder assessment. In 2004, the assessment 's name was formally changed to "Clifton StrenghtsFinder" in honor of its chief designer. In 2007, building on the initial assessment and language from StrenghtsFinder 1.0, Rath and Gallup scientists released a new edition StrenghtsFinder 2.0. An alternative assessment book that provides a deeper interpretation of strengths that one may apply to their everyday life is Now Discover Your Strengths by Marcus Buckingham & Donald O. Clifton, Ph.D. Clifton

Robert Emmons (2013) and his colleague did three experimental studies to see the relation between gratitude and SWB. In the first two studies the participants were college students, whereas in the third study, they had chosen adults suffering from hereditary and first stage of neuromuscular disease. The sample of first study consisted of 201 undergraduate participants (147 women, 54 men). They were a part of health psychology class in a university. These participants were divided in a group of three, and were given a task of writing 10 weekly reports. First group had to write five grateful things that they experienced in the past week, second group had to write five hassled conditions that they experienced throughout a week and the third group had to write five life events that had any effect on them, whether good or bad. In order to measure grateful emotions, participants were asked on the weekly form if they had received any help from anyone in the past week. If they answered “yes” to any of these, they were then

A – Character Strengths-Undertake the Values-in Action (VIA) Character Strengths survey and review your top five signature strengths. Write a brief narrative on each of the strengths which include the activities, actions and behaviours which demonstrates the application of these strengths. Mention the classification of each character strength according to the virtue classification (using the virtues sheet).

There are many studies that explore what “happiness” is. To evaluate “happiness,” a measurement called “Oxford Happiness Inventory” was developed. And this article tests the internal consistency—or the reliability—of this measure, and was performed to undergraduate students across nations, including the U.K., U.S.A., Australia, and Canada. Moreover, the study assesses whether Eysenck’s definition of happiness is valid. The study provides how Eysenck defined happiness: happiness is “a thing called stable extraversion… (and since) the positive affect in happiness seemed to be related to easy sociability, with a natural, pleasant interaction with other people… it only make sense that happiness can be associated with extraversion (Francis, 168).”

Results confirmed the hypothesis with positive correlations with happiness and hope (r = 0.70), zest (r = 0.48), gratitude (r = 0.45), love (r = 0.43) and curiosity (r = 0.50). However, it was found the character strengths in this study with the highest positive correlations with happiness were hope (r = 0.70), curiosity (r = 0.50), social intelligence (r = 0.49), zest (r = 0.48) and bravery (r =.45). Bravery and social intelligence were different character strengths found in the top five correlations with happiness in this study. Compared to findings from previous research which found gratitude and love in their top five correlations with happiness (Peterson & Park, 2007; Hausler, Strecker, Huber, Brenner, Höge & Höfer,

Due to the increase in research on subjective wellbeing throughout the 1980’s, and its relation to personality, the Satisfaction with Life Scales (1993) were developed (Diener, Emmons, Larson & Griffin, 1985). Life satisfaction refers to a

Literature reviews since the times of Wilson (1967) point to such elements as optimism, sociability and extraversion as the essential sources, or at least correlates with SWB. Happiness and its elements are connected differentially and anotomously to the personality traits of Extraversion and Neuroticism has been broadly recorded since Costa and McCrae (1980) exhibited that positive affect associates with Extraversion and that negative affect corresponds contrarily with Neuroticism. Notion that Extraversion is the overwhelming predictor of happiness would seem, by all accounts, to be plainly obvious in light of the fact that Extraversion is connected with friendships and social interactions, which are major source of happiness and personal fulfilment in both private and public life (Campbell, Converse & Rodgers, 1976). Moreover, modern culture implements a high level of social activity and interaction, both due to a constantly expanding population and on account o an expanding interreliance on others to meet the regular needs of living (Pavot, Diener & Fujita,

The author’s personal strengths are compassion, fairness, kindness, integrity, gratitude and open mindedness. These personal

Satisfaction with life is oftentimes highly correlated with happiness, but it is not by inherently the same as happiness. One may be satisfied with one’s life outcomes or satisfied with external factors, without being very happy. Once discovering a satisfaction with life rating, one may be able to determine if satisfaction with life is something one can control, and if it is, one may be able to maximize one’s life satisfaction. For instance, if one is typically not searching for a mate, and he or she scores low on this scale, one may be more willing in the future to seek a partner if he or she knows that statistically speaking, people with partners are more satisfied with his or her life.

Positive Psychology “aims to understand how human strengths can be used to help people flourish and be successful in life” (Bolt 1). The assessments in this chapter help individuals to understand if they are flourishing, how much autonomy we have in our lives, how much we believe an individual can change, our view of what exactly intelligence is, how much personal control we believe we have and finally, how much we challenge ourselves to change and grow.