Imagine the world with less stress. A world where one can turn on the television and not be met with strife, and a place where society can be content with who it is. This kind of place may not be that far away, but we are keeping it at bay by engaging in reckless activities and dragging others down with us. If we stopped giving our energy to these things that don’t matter in the long run, then we could achieve peace within our society and much less stress. Society attempts to remove the scrutiny placed upon it by making others’ issues bigger than its own, causing an incorrect reality, and therefore jeopardizing healthy relationships in its attempt.
It’s a simple fact that drama stresses people out, and nobody likes to stress. In fact, too much stress has been proven to have some very negative
…show more content…
Especially in the case of drama, many people feel like they’re “sucked into” a situation whether they like it or not. In the Crucible, this natural tendency took a relationship south. Since John Proctor has been so involved with the witch trials because of his own drama that is tied up in it all, his wife doesn’t even trust him when he says “because it speaks deceit, and I am honest!” (Miller 59). When we focus so much of our energy outwards on the drama, others have a tendency to question our authenticity- and our ability to drive. Rubbernecking has been an issue in the world since automobiles were invented. “This common behavior not only leads to traffic tie-ups, it may cause up to 10% of accidents that occur in the opposite direction on the highway”(Solomon). Why do we want to know so badly? Assistant editor Sarah Grey quotes Michael Stevens in her article on the science of rubbernecking. He says, “We often find uncertainty more unpleasant than unpleasant certainty.” If we look, there’s some satisfaction of knowing- some kind of satisfaction that you just can’t get from not
We should not judge people by their peak of excellence; but by the distance they have traveled from the point where they started”(Henry Ward Beecher). In 1692 Salem, Massachusetts Madness is consuming Salem, and everyone is accused of being with the devil. John Proctor’s affair with Abigail jump starts the witch hunts. In the Crucible Arthur Miller embodies Proctor as a tragic hero with many flaws but his fatal flaw was his pride which caused his demise. Throughout the play we witness Proctor’s transformation as a person from a sinful remorseless adulterer, repentant, and to an honorable man.
As human beings, we each display specific traits and qualities that define our character and shape our personalities. The way in which we carry ourselves establishes our reputations, as well as how others identify us. We are each prone to making mistakes, and unfortunately, the mistakes we make can affect the way people see us as well. The struggle to regain a good name can be difficult and uncertain once someone’s reputation is tarnished. In Arthur Miller’s timeless play, The Crucible, a well-respected man named John Proctor betrays his wife and struggles to gain her forgiveness and his good name in the village of Salem. Although John Proctor betrays his wife, he
This was extremely sad and portrayed a painful picture of how slaves were treated and the emotional turmoil they endured while living as slaves. The protagonist discusses how she was a victim of sexual violence, be treated by her master and her mistress, how slavery made her lose her innocence and they ability to feel safe.The protagonist discusses how she was a victim of sexual violence,betrayed by her master and her mistress, how slavery made her lose her innocence ad the ability to feel safe.She described how she lived in fear of reprimands from her master should she reveal his sexual request to her. Slavery affected southern society because the white women born to the slave owner had to watch their husbands do as they wish with
Purist Salem, Massachusetts in 1692 suffered from a rapidly increasing phenomenon: witchcraft accusations and trials. The Crucible is a play that recounts the times of this incident. For the most part, it follows a man known as John Proctor. He is a sensible, honest, and hardworking man who made the mistake of succumbing to lust which sets off a chain of events that leads to the witch trials, and to his own demise. Arthur Miller’s The Crucible’s protagonist John Proctor proves to be a flawed human being who struggles to make sense of his past relationship with Abigail, his love for his wife, and his pride.
In Arthur Miller’s, The Crucible, a play about teenage girls discovered to practice witchcraft who then accuse the fellow women of the town to have bewitched them, a notable change occurs in the protagonist, John Proctor’s, character. Proctor, as he enters the story, gives the audience a first impression of one who isn’t easily fooled and holds secret meetings behind his wife’s back. As the story progresses, though, the audience as shown a deeper side of Proctor, one that reveals his not so even temper, his willingness to set things right, and his re-discovered love for his wife.
Abby, an average, rebellious teenager, lives her day-to-day life as one might expect. She ignores authority when she is around her friends, keeps secrets, and gets out of trouble by using the outcasts of the school as scapegoats. She seems to have an air of authority and coolness that everyone wants, but little do they know that she is just trying her best to fit in. Some people might say that Abby’s whole life is influenced by the fear of fitting in. In the play The Crucible, there are also many characters who are motivated by fear. This play is about the Salem witch trial and how the conditions escalated to the point that 17 people died. Although some people say fear doesn’t have a big influence on people’s actions, fear is the greatest motivator of human behavior.
To start with, selfishness causes drama throughout the town in The Crucible; often drama can lead to relationship ending or fatal situations. In the past, John Proctor and Abigail Williams had an affair. After the affair, Abigail Williams would continue trying to seduce John Proctor; it was not working. Proctor was trying to earn his wife, Elizabeth Proctors, trust
In the Crucible, the tension increases between all of the characters in the story. Everyone is worried that Betty is afflicted by a demonic force and pressure starts to come to her and other girls because of their peculiar activity in the forest. In order to escape from this, she blames Tituba. She does this because she is trying to protect her reputation which is already falling apart. Abigail is involved with these supernatural deities, but accuses Tituba because she also in involved.
In Risk, players attempt to strategically conquer as much territory of the world as possible. In Ryanne’s case, the use of strategy in the start of the game created a permanent foundation that became a stepping stone for the rest of her conquests. Due to this, the comparison between her strategies and those of Rafael Trujillo’s became evident. Rafael Trujillo - a ruthless dictator in the Dominican - sought control by force and used military power to instill fear amongst his subjects. During Risk, Ryanne’s strategies and aggression from start to finish mimic those used by Trujillo. In Risk, Ryanne gained immense amounts of power and instilled fear amongst the other players due to her strong strategies and inhumane attacks, which was similar to how Rafael Trujillo gained and retained a political stronghold over the Dominican during the 1900s.
“Most people are not really free. They are confined by the niche in the world that they carve out for themselves. They limit themselves to fewer possibilities by the narrowness of their vision.” This quote by V.S Niapaul demonstrates the idea that people limit themselves. They limit themselves to there own ideas. They don’t believe in themselves. Mary Warren in The Crucible demonstrates this by not believing in herself and settling for being a “follower”. Mary however, has a sincere sense of loyalty to John Proctor her employer. Mary Warren goes through an inner battle of peer pressure and her loyalty to Proctor. Mary’s yearning to fit in and loyalty to Proctor develops the theme that peer
In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, various characters, whether it is from physical trials or unseen personal struggles, experience some kind of major conflict. There are those who spend every day in fear, wondering whether or not they will be falsely accused of witchcraft. There are others who struggle with more internal trials, such as forgiving those who have hurt them. The protagonist, John Proctor, was a man of strong moral constitution, and held himself to a high standard for the sake of his good name and family. As a result of this, he struggled with a major internal conflict throughout the play.
Have you ever felt so burdened or overlooked that it leads you to deception? How can one readily react to these feelings, and what can be done if we find ourselves submerged in duplicity far beyond any point of return? In order to better answer these questions, one must first look to both literature and history for demonstrations of such conceptions. Just one example of this being that of the well-known play and movie, The Crucible. As first written in 1953 by Arthur Miller, The Crucible is the powerful production and retelling of the erratic events which took place in the town of Salem during the late 1600’s. The story follows a group of young girls who, after being discovered in the woods dancing, decides it is best to charge the honest as partakers in witchcraft; and instill turmoil and distraction not just within Salem, but the entire region as well. One of the girls guilty of such accusations is that of Mary Warren; the tentative, disingenuous housemaid of John and Elizabeth Proctor, who during the progression of the story, felt ashamed of her actions and took the sand to confess not just her own, but all the girls’ fabricated behavior. However as the confession wore on and testimonies denying her statement true came forward, Mary ultimately gave to the pressure and returned to her previous actions of fraud and deception. Doings which only compliment her many viable flaws of a naive judgement, weak minded demeanor, and inability to stay true to her word; and that
In Act 1, the dramatic tension is started when Hale finds out about how Abigail and the girls were dancing in the forest and begins to interrogate her. This puts pressure on her and she tries to minimize the situation which can be inferred in the line "Why a very little frog jumped" (35). She uses the phrase "very little" which makes the "movement" insignificant. Eventually, the pressure gets to Abigail and she blames Tituba which immediately reduces the pressure on her and starts the process of accusation. It also increases the tension because a part of the story has unravelled to Hale- who is currently the most powerful person in the room. The blame can be evidenced in the quote "I never called him! Tituba, Tituba-"( 35). She chose to blame
On a chilly Halloween evening October 31, 2015. Jack and Alex started to get ready to go Trick or Treating. Their friend Jake was having a Halloween party. Jack asked his mom if she could go with to get the candy and she agreed. So Jack and Alex started to go stopping at people's houses to get candy.
American playwright Arthur Miller, in his play The Crucible (1952) displays to us that which hunt still exists in American society. Miller supports this claim by drawing parallels between the Salem Witch trials and the senator Joseph McCarthy. His purpose is to warn his readers of the dangers of mass hysteria. He uses emotional appeals and logic to convince the readers that mass “hunts” are still a danger to Americans today. The crucial way however, that Miller achieves his supreme objective of revealing the risks of reputation vs. integrity is through a fascinating character, John Proctor. John is an example of an internally conflicted character because he had a huge argument with Elizabeth over Abigail, Proctor also had an affair with Abigail, and lastly John had a choice between life and death at the end of the play.