and has one of the lowest homicide rates (Masters). Along with Norway, Finland, Germany, and France have high ownership rates but have low crime rates. In contrast with these countries, Luxembourg has a complete ban on handguns but has nine times the crime rate. The Harvard study concluded that crime rates are directly related to “social, economic, and cultural factors.” Furthermore, they came to the conclusion that guns don't kill people, people kill people. Russia enforces considerably strict gun control laws, but with these laws, Russia has four times the crime rate of the United States. The study proved that when guns are restricted, other means are used in the murders (Mcquain). While some claim that the US is an outlier on gun control, …show more content…
However, having minimal gun laws proved to be the best plan of action. While having an uncontrollable amount of guns could be detrimental to a country’s survival, it is also apparent that when citizens have guns or other forms of protection during a mass shooting, there are less casualties. This gives a compromise between strict gun control laws and no gun control laws. Since microstamping and background checks limit the majority of gun related incidents, it lets the citizens keep guns but with helping limit gun related homicides. By giving this compromise, citizens on both sides of the argument would be contempt. More research would need to be done to come up with a complete solution to gun control. Many countries are starting to implement gun control into their societies and some are not putting any gun control in place. As these countries develop it becomes normal to either not have guns or to have guns at all times. Murder and crime rates will be easy to compare at this time especially if areas record their crime the same way. This issue needs to be discussed with the main issue of saving lives instead of just taking pride in a political party. Many people on both sides of the issue just listen to what their side has to say and leaves out other information presented by the other side. This results in a biased mindset and people become less knowledgeable on the issue. With further research and study, mass shootings will become preventable and crime rates will
Gun Control in the United States has gone out of control. The United States should enforce laws to not allow any guns in a house hold in order to reduce violence and crime in the country. Reducing the rate of crime in the United States, controlling big weapons, taxing ammunition, and gun collection can help make this happen. Gun Control can make this country a safer environment to live in.
America needs stricter measures on gun usage because other countries have clearly shown that it is possible to have a much lower percentage of gun-related violence. The obvious changes that America needs to improve on are stricter gun-control laws, and a system of education before people are allowed to own guns.
Gun-control has been a controversy between Americans over the years and it has gotten to a point where it seems to divide Americans severely. It has been a controversy on whether or not the U.S. should establish tougher gun-control laws rather than preserve our current gun laws. The U.S. should establish tougher gun-control laws in order to put a stop to gun violence.
Gun control has been the top subject matter “since last December” (Mental). It is up to the Congress, the Senate, and the Legislature to do this so everything in the United States will be all right. The United States can be a better place if this what’s to happen latter on in the years to come. Not only stronger laws but better background checks “for the Federal Bureau” people. There are people in the United States and across the world who favor and oppose to this situation (“Gun Control Laws”). Per, the chart sixty-seven percent of people favor and thirty-two percent of people oppose to the background checks. Another thing is that two percent of people have no opinion about this matter (“Gun Control Laws”). Based upon an estimate there are
As a result of all the violence occurring around the world, there have been many discussions about gun control laws. Many people want to say that there should be more gun control laws without even thinking of the consequences that could emerge, such as an increase of more violent crime. For example, a study by Harvard shows that Russia has only one‐ninth Norway’s gun ownership rate but a murder rate 2500% higher. Every other European country follows this pattern
In today’s America, violence is becoming a great concern to everyone in the nation. One of the major problems in America is the way it's portrayed instead of handled. There many people trying to intensify gun control laws; but, increasing gun control laws is not that way to go. Although, weapons have the potential to kill, they are also used for protection.
Gun control issue have become very debatable in the U.S. There was a study about how many people die in mass shooting. In fact, the article reports that the percentage of dying in a car crash is mover 100 times more than dying by a gun. Furthermore, there was a study performed about Europe and their gun laws. It was more likely that a region that had laws in place where people could not have guns. This statistics is fascinating because the research shows that if more than 3 people were killed happened with restricted gun
he shootings that has happened all through the Unites States has made an great divide among Americans on what ought our country do to keep further shootings from happening. Numerous individuals trust that forcing new laws on how people buy weapons should require background verifications. Gun Control in the United States of America is a topic that has had lots of criticism and support by numerous citizens. The critical people of this topic trust that the guns don 't murder people, is that people kill people. The supporters of this topic trust that weapons lead to violence and a feeling of power over others. They additionally believe that if firearms were eliminated with from the public, then violence and death would diminish intensely in this nation. These two restricting perspectives leave the government open to a choice on whether or not to abolish one of our Constitutional rights, or to continue permitting individuals the privilege to possess a firearm. There are numerous issues that should be looked at in order to decide which laws are important.
There has always been and always will be a problem with crime in America. Gun control has become a hot topic when talking about crime prevention. Gun control is any law, policy, or practice created to regulate the possession, production, sale, and use of firearms by private citizens.
I got a golden ticket. I’m not worthy. To all of my dear Liberal friends who still believe that putting even more restrictions on guns is the proper response to the mass shootings that happen in America I am writing to tell you that you are wrong. I understand how putting restrictions on guns sounds like a good idea, but it isn’t. Germany which is considered the strictest country on gun control laws has suffered yet another attack upon its populace using guns. A gunman armed with a handgun shot and killed nine civilians and injuring another twenty-one in a MacDonald’s restaurant. Laws prohibiting law abiding citizens from owning guns will not stop Islamic terrorists or other criminals from obtaining firearms, and even if it could it would not
Over time politicians are always looking for new things to make laws about and regulate. This is no different with guns. Overall the democratic party tends to be in favor of stricter gun laws, with wanting more regulations placed on legal ownership of firearms rather than criminals. The Republican party has tended to be less focused on restricting gun ownership. The first politician that comes to mind when I think of gun regulations is Kevin de Leon from the California Senate. He is very left wing and very uninformed when it comes to guns. Just last June, Mr. Leon wanted to pass 11 more restrictions or laws on legal gun owners. “Large ammunition clips: Bans possession of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 bullets. Bullet buttons:
Should there be gun control? Should there be restrictions on guns? No, there should not be gun control or a restriction on guns. Gun control laws don't deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Also guns don't kill people, people kill people. There needs to be a person that thinks it's okay to kill a person to pull the trigger.
Firstly, with the regulation of guns, everyday liberties could be in jeopardy. When Adolf Hitler took over Germany, he “banned gun ownership for the Jews” (Root, 2). The Jews were a targets for German hatred and as a result he purposely left them defenseless in a world of violence. With no weapons, they could not fight back against the troops, which then further enabled Hitler to dominate them without worries of a retaliation. If Americans were granted strict gun control laws, who is to say those with guns would not further oppress those they deem as unworthy or useless? Who is going to stop them from crushing the innocent like simple roaches who wonder in the filth of our homes? Everyone puts up front, a front that may fake the feeling of
The most dangerous technology in existence in the world today are guns. Looking back at history we use them in the war to kill people. Throughout the world, guns have been the leading cause of deaths every year. We as American must change of how we regulate weapons throughout our country. The only way I think that this can be changed is by having stricter gun laws. Such as, looking at the amount of ammo to carry and even strict laws of selling automatic weapons to stop mass killings. Since the Sandy Hook shooting in Connecticut I was thinking about how the weapons were around the kids, and what destruction it caused. These children are the future of our community, but if they are getting killed then how are they going to better the community
There are many countries that have strict gun laws which help with gun deaths. Japan and Singapore have the strictest rules regarding gun ownership. In Japan to own a gun you need to get background checks, drug and mental tests, as well as formal instruction and this, could take as long from days to weeks. In Singapore, Civilians are not allowed to have guns at all. If they want to target shoot, they must get a License and permit ownership. They also have to make sure that it is securely stored in an approved and protected firing range, and is not taken out of the firing range without special permission. Because of these rules and policies put in place Singapore and japan’s annual death by gun count, combined, is not higher than 10. America