Stricter Gun Laws Research Paper

Guns are a major problem in our society and the numbers of these gun-related murders are continuing to rise. On top of the murders you also have people losing their lives through misfire and gun-related suicides. The total death toll of all gun-related deaths averages over 30,000 per year in the U.S. (http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2013/03/07/u-s-gun-deaths-visualizing-the-numbers/). I believe that enforcing stricter gun laws will contribute to getting these numbers lower. The numbers do not lie, we as a society have a problem with gun-violence and we need to do something to fix it.

Although an ongoing issue throughout decades, recently the debate surrounding gun control laws is being heated by the multiple mass shootings that have been occurring in the past few years. With each mass shooting the issue whether if gun control laws are the answer or not to solve this perceived national crisis. The reason why the United States, unlike many other countries that have already banned or restricted more heavily certain guns, has not developed a more radical approach to the problem is because of the Constitution.

There is a debate that is going on over the Gun Control laws and background checks. Many people have different views across the country on the issue. I am completely with the choice to make it a lot harder for people to obtain any weapons. I would support laws So making sure that gun storesthey would have to do further looking into people's backgrounds and mental states. AuthoritiesPeople would have to make sure that they enforce the laws not just change them. I think this would be a very good choice and would help cut down on some of these mass shooting from happening. I think it would encourage the American people to start getting involved and help out and report anything they can to help stop any violence.

Gun control laws regulate the possession and purchase of firearms, including the types of guns that may be owned, waiting periods required for purchase, and classification of persons who are prohibited from owning firearm. There tend to demands for stricter gun control laws. Local politicians to push for state laws closing the gun – show loopholes. In this essay I will be talking about Gun Control Laws.

The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Today, we have no reason to fear our military barging into our homes. One might say, “What about burglars?” How can burglars use guns to hurt us if we have strict gun laws? There should be extensive background research on those who want to own a gun, and universal background checks. The numbers from Adam Lankford’s, an associate professor of criminal justice at the University of Alabama, study do show that restrictive gun laws make a difference (Christensen, Jen. "U.S. Leads the World in Mass Shootings - CNN.com." CNN). In Australia, for example, there were four mass shootings between 1987 and 1996. After the incidents, Parliament passed stricter gun laws. There hasn’t been a mass shooting in Australia since the new laws were passed (Christensen, Jen. "U.S. Leads the World in Mass Shootings - CNN.com." CNN). Some people like Ben Carson who said “I never saw a body with bullet holes that was more devastating than taking the right to arm ourselves away”(The Editorial Board. "The Children Left Behind After Mass Shootings." The New York Times). find it ok to have hundreds of thousands of people dead instead of one person not having his or her desire. It is outrageous that anyone would think so, and even more absurd that someone who is suppose to vow to protect us is selling us out to

Gun control has been a controversial topic, no doubt. It has led people to say that people shouldn’t be able to buy guns, and this argument has split America. Since I am a hunter I do believe people should have the right to buy guns. I also want to pass a bill that removes some types of guns away from the market.

Thomas Jefferson said, “The beauty of the 2nd amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it”. Guns are a major crime factor in the U.S but adding more gun laws won’t decrease the violence rate. The problem of gun control starts when it’s difficult for law abiding citizens to purchase any type of firearm. Unfortunately, gun laws do not work on criminals but only makes it easier for them to create violence. This can lead to more people having a bad view on guns. Therefore, having more gun regulations will not make a difference in the decrease of crime, it will just enhance it.

​In the news today, there have been many shootings around the United States, putting the public in an uproar. Stricter gun laws will not solve the problem because criminals will still have guns. People should be able to protect their home.

Gun control laws do not need to be tightened or increased. While guns can be obtained by a majority of the population, there does not need to be tighter restrictions because first, the constitution says we have the freedom to possess arms, and second, increasing gun laws have never reduced crimes.

Should the U.S. impose stricter gun laws to protect our people? Why, or why not?

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary for a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed (“The Constitution of the United States,” Amendment 2).” These fourteen straightforward words in the Bill of Rights have been a debate for most of our history. While criminals are loading up on combat weapons, why should the citizens have a hard time just to own a hand gun? The government needs to learn that their attempts on gun control does not work, gun control makes it hard for the honest citizens to keep their family safe from criminals and

The US has a numerous set of laws needed to be abided by in order to own or carry a gun. In certain states you have to have more of a reason to purchase a gun than in others. The government and federal law has the mentality that guns are what kill people, so they try to do their best and try to prohibit as much of guns or gun accessories as possible. When in fact it isn’t the gun that is killing people, it is people that kill people.

Allowing people to freely own and carry weapons will statistics show people who currently own guns are more likely to commit suicide than to kill others. In the article "How to reduce gun violence" by Peter Aldhous the graph's statistics show how suicide accounted for 30,000+ deaths in 2013, however, this does not mean people with access to guns don't kill others, it's actually the contrary. In the article "Death and guns in the USA" by Rey Sanchez says that 90% of citizens in Oregon live heavily armed and that terrorism has caused far less deaths than by gun relatedness, about 400,490 deaths were caused by gun violence in 2013. This means that people who have access to guns or own guns have been able to kill almost half a million people. These deaths are all attributed by weapons which are easily attainable due to our nations loose interpretation of the constitution. The second amendment supposedly gives citizens the right to own and carry guns without infringement. Having an easier accessibility to weapons makes it easier for people who seek to murder to obtain these weapons, a higher availability will mean there is more chances for deaths by guns. Therefore, limiting gun use and ownership will change statistical percentiles of deaths by guns causing it to decrease because guns would be harder to obtain, this meaning any type of limitations such as denied the ownership of guns, limiting the types of guns and ammunition or background checks on the individual owning the guns, even background checks could be ineffective in a way because one's true intentions is impossible to determine with criminal records

There was a Harvard study that discovered “Nations with stringent anti-gun laws generally have substantially higher murder rates than those that do not”. This helps support why the U.S does not need stricter gun laws. Three consequences that would come from stricter gun laws are that they would increase violent crimes, impede the 2nd amendment rights, and we are also not enforcing the laws that we already have in effect.

The Second Amendment grants the right to U.S. citizens to keep and bear arms. Gun laws were put in place with the intention of keeping people safe. But what happens when people use guns as a way to inflict harm? It is seen all over the news; there was a drive by shooting in this town / at this school. Or maybe it is a mass shooting at a concert, whatever the circumstance, the killer has the intention of one thing and one thing only. To kill. Nobody knows how to stop the violence caused by people with guns. They think maybe if more restrictions are put on the guns that will help. The question is, will stricter gun laws help to reduce crime? If so, will the people be willing to give up their right to bear arms? While some people might not agree with stricter gun laws, there may be some good things about them.