According to the author, national identity is inherently social and is centered on people’s strong bond and sense of community with their fellow group members. People are placed into national groups either by choice or by default. The strength of the person’s membership depends on the level of commitment they feel towards the national group. The level of commitment divides group members into strong and weak identifiers. Group members of a national group that care about the group’s well-being are considered strong identifiers. These members are strongly committed and often see their national group membership as part of their sense of self. Strong identifiers hold and follow group norms so they can be the best prototype for their national identity. …show more content…
Strong identifiers are treated more fairly when they are seen as the prototype of the group. Their opinions about their group are highly valued and taken into consideration between all of the members. Because of their high commitment to their group, strong identifiers remain loyal though hard times and times of doubt. They want to protect the group’s image by focusing on the positive aspects. When faced with negative information about their group, these members will defend their group’s actions and criticisms in order to protect the group image.
Group members do not tolerate weak identifier’s criticisms. Their criticisms of their group are often not listened to and disregarded by members who have stronger commitments. This could be because weak identifiers do not share the same level of loyalty as strong identifiers. Weak identifiers care less about the groups image and do not feel a strong need to defend the group.
I consider myself a strong identifier in being an American. I would say that I fit the typical stereotype of an American. I support the choices Americans make and remain loyal even through the bad decisions. When natural disasters or unexpected tragedies happen in America, I feel instant empathy towards everyone that was effected, even if I have never met them. I see every American and myself as one big community. Being an American has always been a part of my identity and I couldn't
Group members must build mutual respect for and trust and confidence in one another, so that “feel free to express opinions, test ideas, and ask for, or offer help when it is needed” (Smith, 1983).
For this paper, I will discuss the thoughts I had when doing this Identity Chest Assignment. This will include the thoughts I had for these topics: the social group membership that was easiest for me to identify, as well as the hardest for me to identify; the questions that arose when establishing the social group that I identify with; the social group membership that I am most aware of on a daily basis, as well as the group that I am least aware of; what surprised me about my overall profile; and lastly, what surprised me about my response to this assignment.
Ethnic Identity Development emphasizes values of their culture through family and community. Individuals identities are established through experiences with “religion, geography, language and kinship” (Chavez). These model describes the similarities between an individual and the ethnic group they identify
Social identity theory states that the ‘in-group’ will discriminate against the ‘out-group’ and show favouritism towards their group to boost their self-esteem. Tajfel also proposed that there are 3 mental processes involved in putting people in to the ‘us’ and ‘them’ groups: social categorisation (putting objects in order to understand them), social identification (adopting the identity of the group we categorised ourselves as belonging to) and social comparison (showing favouritism towards the ‘in group’ and hostility towards the ‘out group’; comparing them).
Ethnic identity is the sum total of group member feelings about those values, symbols, and common histories that identify them as a distinct group (Smith 1991). Development of ethnic identity is important because it helps one to come to terms with their ethnic membership as a prominent reference group and significant part of an individuals overall identity. Ethnic reference group refers to an individuals psychological relatedness to groups (Smith 1991). These reference groups help adolescents sense, reflect and see things from the point of their ethnic groups in which they actively participate or seek to participate.
As previously stated in this paper, forming cultural identity may be more complicated today than ever. However, it is a critical part of a total structure of collective and individual identity. Based on the text, models of ethnic and cultural identity have increased dramatically over the last few decades. Today, most ethnic groups are accepting the fact that the United States is the most ethically diverse place to live and to raise a
However, it isn’t that way in real life. Social groups have a hierarchical power structure depending on where in the world you are. For example, if you are a black person you are likely to have a 10% longer sentencing for the same crime committed by a white person (Rehavi & Starr, 2012). With this being said, creating a strong group identity can help minorities feel more comfortable with their minority identity. A healthy connection to a group identity is crucial for developing a healthy individual identity because it helps individuals connect with the world around them and decide how they fit in the world. According to Martin and Nakayama the stages of minority identity development is as follows: 1) Unexamined identity, 2) Conformity, 3) Resistance and Separatism, and 4) Integration (Martin & Nakayama,
Conclusion: The study Demonstrated that people seek a positive social identity and that their social identity is affected by being a part of their group so that you are more positive towards anything that your own group represents.
Social identity theory proposed by Tajfel & Turner (2004) is a theory of group membership and behaviour which has made significant contributions in explaining in-group favouritism, out-group denigration, competition and other interactions of an individual among social groups (Korte, 2007; Brown, 2000; Tajfel & Turner, 2004). Social identity theory can be defined as an individual’s sense of who they are based on the group that they belong to through a process of self-categorisation and depersonalisation (Tajfel & Turner, 2004). In this essay, I will define social identity theory through its three mental processes involved in group evaluation which are: social identification which is a process whereby we are placed into certain
Tajfel (1981) described ethnic identity as part of an individual’s self-concept developed from knowledge of membership in a cultural group and the value or emotional significance attached to that membership. Ethnic identity content has been defined as “the actual ethnic behaviors that individuals practice, along with their attitudes toward their ethnic group” (Phinney, 1993, p. 64). Charlesworth (2000) maintained ethnic identity development to be an essential human need that provided a sense of belonging and historical continuity and created a foundation on which to build a concept of self.
However, for group identity it applies to more than one person it is a group of people that share similar characteristics and beliefs with each other. Essentially, one identifies themselves and others through multiple “labels” or “categories” such as age, skin color, and culture. Like so with an identification card, it lists gender, hair color, eye color, and height. It demonstrations the physical features of a person that are associated with identity. But identity touches upon much more than just appearances, it is also composed of personal beliefs, intellect that other people can relate, because it comes from within the deepest part of your brain. The mind’s consciousness and unconsciousness makes up the choices and actions of your behavior. Even your parents whom gave birth to the individual you have developed into doesn’t know everything about you, it is just impossible. Comparable to a machine, it’s impossible to discern every nut and bolt it is made of unless you are there and scrutinize the inside. Your parents can’t go inside your brain and dissect what it is made of, because it will kill you. Each person’s unique identity contains aspects that are gained from experience and beliefs influenced by the people around them, there can never be a person to live life exactly like another, therefore no two persons can be
The world has become modern and global. Identification of the self is a complicated, though, an important problem of every individual. Self- identity is based on inner values and reflections on culture, politics and social interactions. The main point is that people label themselves to any particular group in the society (Worchel etc., 1998). According to Ferguson: “Identity commonly refers to which it makes, or is thought to make
Now moving on to social identity, it is important because it is an ingredient for social discrimination. In order for people to discriminate they have to belong to a group. Social identity theory suggests that people "remain loyal when they feel that their organizations have same values and appreciate them" (Tyler, 1999, p. 235). However, social identity theory maintains that when people feel that their organization values and appreciates them, it is a sign of organizational respect for them or of their high status within the organization (Tyler). High status is likely to increase people's organizational commitment because it enhances their social identity (Tyler). Therefore, social identity is reflected in people's self-esteem (Chattopadhyay, 1999).
In most case, identity is shaped by culture. Since culture is a set of ideals life practices, routines and attitudes set up by a certain community hence culture plays a major role in shaping the identity of an individual. An individual’s character and attributes can be because of their background. This is due to the set up that one has grown up (Dumas 19). People tend to learn more about their culture, and as they grow up it becomes part of them. They embrace the culture’s beliefs and tend to do things following the set routines. The aspect of following the set routine and beliefs play a significant part in shaping the identity of an individual.
Cultural identity is a part of the psychological self-concept that expresses an individual or group’s worldview and perceived cultural affiliations. The first step in finding a societal fit is to establish a cultural identity; this can be on an individual level and group level. Who am I? And where do I belong? These questions start to form in the human mind from an early age; it drives humans to explore their worldviews and how and where they fit in the world. Rosenfeld (1971) argued it is a deep-seated primal process that has ensured our continual survival. By finding others that think and act similarly we are offered some protection (Erickson, as cited in Carducci 2015). Erickson (as cited in Carducci, 2015) and Maslow (as cited in Mcleod 2007) argued that the need to belong is a basic building block of human development. Whatever the reason, the consensus is that humans have an intrinsic need to find a like-minded cultural group to belong to; this chosen affiliation is their cultural identity. A person may identify with more than one cultural