Structural Adjustment Policies Require Borrowing Countries

Several developing countries are sunk in debt and poverty because of the arrangements of global establishments, for example, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Their projects have been vigorously reprimanded for a long time and have been constantly blamed for poverty. Moreover, developing countries have been in constant expanded reliance on the wealthier countries, despite the IMF and World Bank's claim that their main goal is to fight poverty (Shah, 2013). During recent decades, the poorest nations on the planet have needed to swing progressively to the World Bank and IMF for money related help, because their impoverishment has made it unthinkable for them to acquire somewhere else. The World Bank and IMF connect strict

Over 75 years later, we still do not have the freedoms President Roosevelt wished upon us. A specific freedom that still does not exist is “economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants.” There are still dozens of poverty stricken countries, known as Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC). These are countries that have a national debt that is unmanageable with traditional manners alone. The good news is that the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative began in 1996 to address this issue. The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMC), and other creditors teamed up to reduce the debt of 36 countries that met strict criteria.

Argentina is a well known case study of the failure or negative outcome of some IMF's standard policies. In fact, Argentina carefully applied policies dictated by IMF, but, until it stuck up with those policies, it couldn't step out from its crisis, and it ran into even deeper economic and social problems. This failure of the IMF has often been cited as the demonstration of unsuitability of the standard IMF approach (the usual so-called Washington Consensus) for solving economic crisis in developing countries (Serra & Stiglitz, 2008, p. 44). Also, this failure led to hostile feelings versus IMF among the population of Argentina (Kanenguiser, 2000) and fueled generalised suspects over IMF decision-making process being politicized and serving

Additionally, the Greek government has also implement healthcare and pension reforms, banning increases of pensions for at least three years. (Hewitt. Gavin, 2010). On the other hand, the super-national government ECB has also launched the Securities Market Program, which allows the ECB to start buying government bonds in order to fight the crisis. Hoping to able to pump more money

Greece is no different than other countries who have been forced to accept IMF loans, the vast majority of these funds end up flowing back into the multinational banks who made the risky loans. The Troika has made demands of increased privatization of national assets as collateral and the destruction of labor rights. All these policies are the exact opposite of what the Greek people voted for when electing the Syriza party. The conditions attached the bailout loans are the exact opposite views of the traditional

Where they had not yet adopted the euro nor ascended into the union, Greece's public service sector (though accounting for half the countries GDP) was seen to seriously hinder any efforts to increase economic growth. But since accession, rapid mobilization of the economy has started to route out the stitches in the corrupt service sector (most reform has been in recent years though). But rapid economic reform didn't come directly after accession, for it wasn't until recently that Greece started better allocating EU subsidies. Until the country had finally set out to reform its poorly structured civil service sector, much of the subsidies were seen to be wasted on remedial government plans and initiatives such as increased electorate pay. Abuse of subsidies was recorded up until the early 90s, but since then Greece has seen considerable returns in foreign investments, and a marginal decrease in both the national debt and inflation rates . To better illustrate Greece's economic standing today, one might take note of the fact that the country is now in a position to distribute large amounts of aid (E.g., Bosnia- Herzegovina) while slowly relying less and less on EU subsidies. Many also believe that Greece's poor economic strategies in early years should serve as a lesson for future Balkan members awaiting accession into the EU as well.

Even though a lot of countries have their own debts, cancelling debts can lead to the future issues. The nations in debts need to pay back what they owed because that is the money they lent, not given. Since the third world countries owed money and loan from the World Bank, they have to take responsibility to repay. Moreover, the debt cancellation can only encourage developing countries to borrow money again and find themselves in debts again due to the fact that they do not expect to pay back their debt. However, these argument tend not to be extremely persuasive because we already explore the advantages or good impacts of debt forgiveness, which in fact save many poor citizens’ lives stay away from poverty. Indeed, the third world countries will never have chance to pay back their debt because the interest is so high and the debts keep

The IMF and World Bank providing loans to impoverished and financially unstable countries is not only irresponsible, it's unethical. I intend to use the example of the loans provided to Mexico during the Mexican peso crisis, also called the Tequila crisis or December mistake crisis to illustrate this, and then provide what I believe would be a better solution

It is proposed that all debt in the United States of America is cancelled because it will solve the United States of America’s debt problem. By resetting debt, the economy will flourish. This

The economic and social crises in the country are characterized under three headings: poor governance: inappropriate social and economic policies and week international prices for the country’s main exports. To help solve those issues in 1990 (the same year) the country’s government (Bretton Woods Institutions) established a Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP). Its objectives are: to achieve and maintain stable economy; to redefine public sector’s role and Government’s capacity to provide basic services; and to be able to create economic environment based on transparency and regulations.

Ever since the end of 2009, Greece has been involved in a financial and economic crisis that has been record breaking and shattered world records in terms of its severity and worldwide effects. The Greek government, since the beginning of the crisis, has attempted to take several governmental measures to try and “stop the bleeding,” including economy policy changes, dramatic government spending and budget cuts and the implementation of new taxes for citizens. In addition to this, the government has tried to alter the perceptions of Greek government and economy by the rest of the world in an effort to appear both more liberal and more democratic. Greece has also been working to privatize many previous

The roots of Greece’s economic problems extend deep down into the recesses of history. After the government dropped the drachma for the euro in 2001, the economy started to grow by an average of 4% annually, almost twice the European Union average. Interest rates were low, unemployment was dropping, and trade was at an all-time high. However, these promising indicators masked horrible fiscal governance, growing government debt and declining current account balances. Greece was banking on the rapid economic growth to build upwards on highly unstable foundations. In 2008, the inevitable happened – the Greek debt crisis.

In 1999, ten European nations joined together to create an economic and monetary union known as the Eurozone. Countries, such as Germany, have thrived with the euro but nations, like Greece, have deteriorated since its adoption of the euro in 2001. The Eurozone was created in 1999 and currently consists of eighteen European nations united under the European Central Bank and all use the euro. The Eurozone has a one point six percent inflation rate and an eleven point six percent unemployment rate in 2014. Greece joined the Eurozone in 2001 and was the poorest European Union member at the time with a two point six percent inflation rate3 (James, 2000). Greece had a long economic history before joining the Eurozone. The economy flourished from 1960 to 1970 with low inflation and modernization and industrialization occurring. The market crash in the late 1970’s led Greece into a state of recession that the nation is still struggling with. Military failures, the PASOK party and the introduction of the euro have further tarnished Greece’s economic stability. The nation struggles with lack of competitiveness, high deficit, and inflation. Greece has many options like bailouts, rescue packages, and PPP to help dig it out of this recession. The best option is to abandon the Eurozone and go back to the drachma. Greece’s inflation and deficit are increasing more and more and loans and bailouts have not worked in the past. Leaving the Eurozone will allow Greece to restructure and rebuild

Many people would agree that it is not right for the third world countries to be paying debts that they aren’t able to pay for. They would have to give up pretty much everything to try and pay the

The third world countries debt is only going to increase if the first world countries do not cancel the debt. The main reason that the debt is going to increase is that the third world countries had made loans with the first world countries and the loans continue to increase. According to Vanessa Baird, “Most loans to the third world have to be repaid in hard currencies; and hard currencies are stable currencies: that means their value does not change much.” (1) This makes it difficult for developing