Strunk and White’s Elements of Style Essay

Star Trek continues to be a cultural phenomenon because of the timeliness of the philosophies it strives to incorporate in its narratives. Furthermore, the series and its creator, Gene Roddenberry, advocate the core natures of humanity: its innate goodness, the beauty in its diversity, and its curiosity. These advocacies continue to enlighten a new generation of viewers and engender principles of embracing difference and transcending the present to achieve

Style and tone is the sixth concept used by Postman. All subjects of knowledge are like genres. They share certain qualities that are distinctive to the subject matter. A man of science could not write about history

Writing varies from a text message to a novel. Writers often have a difficult task in creating a piece of work that truly identifies the meaning of good writing. Every good writer usually starts with the basics such as genre, audience, rhetorical situation, and reflection of the piece. Throughout this semester, we have gone through all of these key terms in great detail with each new assignment that has come our way. In doing this, not only as students but also as writers, we have come to create our own theory of writing. Every writer has a different theory of writing though most are very similar. Now, at this point in the semester after doing countless journals, in-class exercises, and final assignments, I think I have figured out my own

Ray Bradbury and Edgar Poe both have somewhat similar writing styles. They both write in mysterious ways, and give a lot of foreshadowing. They also seem to enjoy writing about tragedies that happen both in the background and upfront. They both elaborate very specifically about how the scene is played out. They both have a similar conflict between possessions and desires. This is seen in both their writing and their backgrounds. Poe and Bradbury both seem to enjoy their writing and love to express what is happening in their lives into their writing. This can be seen when Bradbury writes the short story There will Come Soft Rains, where he is battling his emotions about technology. With Poe, this can be seen in A Tell Tale Heart, where he

In “To Read like a Writer” Mike Bunns introduces how writing is “a series of choices” with an account of his past as an employee at a theatre. As he was trying to concentrate on his reading, he had an epiphany that literary works are all “a series of choices”(Bunns 72). He then transitions to his main claim of how reading like a writer allows for the reader to determine whether or not to adopt the same style as the piece that the text may have. He breaks this down into subsections that readers need to observe before they tackle the writing, such as context, genre, and publication. Additionally, he points out the necessity to makes notes while reading the

Authors produce their work in certain ways to give it a certain atmosphere and mood. Examples of this are shown in Tim O Brien’s novel The Things They Carried. “Because the land was mined and booby-trapped, it was SOP for each man to carry a steel-centered nylon-covered flak jacket, which weighed 6.7 pounds…Because you could die so quickly, each man carried at least one large compress bandage…Because the nights were cold, and because the monsoons were wet, each carried a green plastic poncho”. Another example of structure is shown in Kevin powers The Yellow Birds. “Or should I have said that I wanted to die, not in the sense of wanting to throw myself off of that train bridge over there, but more like wanting to be asleep forever because there isn’t any making up for killing women or even watching women get killed”.

Style – in writing, style can best be defined as the way an author makes use of his or her words in regards to language. The word choices in which the author uses throughout the story can help establish the uniqueness of his or her use of speech through the story’s title, structure, punctuation, setting and the communication between characters.

The English language has evolved substantially since its beginning. It has evolved from sign language, to Shakespearean, to modern English we speak today. This evolution has also created a standard of writing, known as the SWE or standard written language. David Foster Wallace’s essay “Authority and American Usage”, addresses the function and importance of a writing class. Wallace finds many of these classes to be troublesome due to the lack of correct usage of standard written language. Most of Wallace’s points and opinions come from his own experiences with his writing class and his experience as a writer. I find that replicating and correctly implementing a style and format of writing that is acceptable to Wallace to

colour, and because of that there is a fire in the tree. Bud becomes a

Having your own style of writing is better than copying someone else’s way of writing. Writing in a specific format can be frustrating, such as essays because it’s uninteresting when writing the way a paper’s assigned repetitively. A book or paper differs when it comes to social media. Books can captivate the reader but social media fascinates a person who can stay on for hours. On websites, such as Facebook, arguments arouse in the comment section over a video or someone who post a status. Many people interact with each other with vulgar, joyful, and sorrowful comments. This is an example where tones can changes depending on a

similar to rap or poetry or any form of storytelling.These last couple of weeks I've been astounded at the various ways of correlating writing styles to other styles and other form of expressing art. Such as comparing grammar structure to muscle building, although the art may not be seen at first glance, the more you begin to dissect these peculiar form of art, the more you begin to respect it for what it is. During the process of study writing styles I’ve also observed, that there

S2 A “convention” in art, for him, is specific techniques of writing which occur frequently over time in the realm of literature, and writers emulate other people's compositions, which they have already read. Literary conventions, therefore, become standard as a customary way of writing.

Among the many books that I have read relating to history, when looking for examples when writing I wish to avoid the style used by Gar Alperovitz. Alperovitz is best known for his books Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam and The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb and the Architecture of an American Myth. In both books, Alperovitz offers a history on why the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan was not necessary and only helped to initiate the Cold War with the Soviet Union. I would like to avoid Alperovitz’s writing style as I feel that his works lack clarity and personal thought. When addressing clarity Alperovitz presents an idea or opinion in writings, but never follows through with the thought. The lack of clarity leads to the author

I find writers who break the rules very intriguing. One writer I chose to do an investigation on is bill bissett. Noticed how I didn’t capitalise his name? In writing, he is prominent for his spelling and capitalisation. The piece of writing above this paragraph is written by bill bissett called ‘IT USD 2 B’. Others may criticise him for his lack of care in grammar and spelling, but I think his style of writing is how he expresses himself and his individuality, which is quite interesting. Perfectionists like me (sometimes) find it very frustrating seeing grammar mistakes in writing. They think perfect diction and syntax is what makes writing beautiful, but in reality, I don’t think it does. The ugliest writing can be beautiful depending on how a person perceives it as. This writing definitely made me feel a bit frustrated and confused the first time I looked at it. But after reading it again and again, I changed my perception of it. I may not understand his writing, but I feel like I could somewhat feel a connection from it. As long as your own writing makes sense to you, it doesn’t really matter what others may think.

The first reason is communication satellites travel at a higher altitude (upwards to 22,000 miles higher) than stations (such as the International Space Station). The second reason is the irregular orbit path space debris takes when it travels. Due to the discrepancies between orbits of space stations and orbits of debris and how massive the orbit field of the Earth is, the probability of satellite debris disrupting astronauts is marginally near to impossible. The final significant inaccuracy in “Gravity” is the petty use of a fire extinguisher as thrust to reach one of the many space stations. As said before, the use of high technology jet-propulsion machines is extremely difficult even in proximity to the station.