Student Performance Assessment Paper

Hence, it is implied that the common core is just as effective as the teacher that is teaching it to their students. And, “preparing ELs to meet the Common Core standards must become a shared responsibility among all educators, including teachers of “mainstream” English language arts, as well as those in other content areas” (Bunch, G. C., Kibler, A., & Pimentel, S. (2012). Some educators, are “insufficiently equipped to teach ELs effectively could be that developing ELs’ language skills have traditionally been viewed as the responsibility of ESL teachers” (Bunch, G. C., Kibler, A., & Pimentel, S. (2012)). Because there has been an influx of ELL students in the main stream classroom, teachers are finding it more difficult to find an alternative and effective instruction for the ELL students in the classroom. Therefore, schools should provide, “teacher preparation and professional development programs that will be designed to support the deeper content, performance and language demands expected of students” (Santos, Darling-Hammond, Cheuk (2012)). By providing teachers with this CCS preparation, teachers will have a better understanding on how to approach ELL students in improving their oral language. And providing ELL students with “the language demands

• Test scores comparing ELL students and native speakers of English as well as number of ELL students identified as requiring special education services

The plan outlines five goals that we have found for our school district. These goals show our commitment to provide the highest possible standards of education for all students in our district and to ensure the fair and equitable treatment of all members of our community. We consider understanding individual differences in each student and teacher so that we can adopt the appropriate programs of study for them of the utmost importance.

The school system do not take in consideration that ELL students not only have a language barrier that prevent them from performing on the standardized tests, but that they are transitioning from a completely different learning environment. ELL students are also classified as poor academic performers because of their language barrier. This language barrier explain the academic achievement gaps between ELL students and native english-speaking students. The test scores are not sufficient proof to argue that ELL students have a gap in academic achievement. This is questionable to the validity of the standardized tests on ELL students.(Youth)

According to the Kennett Consolidated School District (2007), “the mission of the district is to provide a quality education that increases the achievement

Those who are currently teaching are required to take a course called Rethinking Equity and Teaching English Language Learners (RETELL) or Secondary English Language (SEI) course so they can be better prepared to teach the students of other primary languages. The data from the ELL students in the three districts are more dramatic than percentages of students with disabilities. Compared to Norwood and Brockton’s ELL student population, Monson only had 7 ELL students in their district in 2016. When comparing the ELA, math, and science scores for all three towns, Monson didn’t even have sufficient data to record. Norwood and Brockton however, had interesting data to compare. In ELA, Norwood scored higher than Brockton with a percentage of 41 and Brockton at 13 percent for students who performed with high proficiency. In math, Norwood had a 40 percent higher academic standing, whereas Brockton only had 15 percent. Both Monson and Brockton ELL students performed below the achievement gap goal with negative scores. Norwood, however, performed above the state level for all three subjects. There was no data found in the scoring of ELL students in Monson for MCAS scores. Out of the 5th grade ELL students in Norwood, who participated in the MCAS, 6 scored in above average, 31 percent scored in proficient, 50 percent scored needs improvement, and 13 percent scored as failing.

3). Some ELL students may start school without any English language skills, while others may have “limited language proficiency or dual language deficiency in both their native language and English” (p. 3). Just as native English speakers, ELL students also have different levels of intellectual abilities; however, their struggle with school in English may be related to background knowledge and not solely on intellectual abilities (Short & Echevarria, 2004). Samson and Collins (2012), purposes if school districts, administrations, and teachers want to see improvements in achievement for ELLs, “greater continuity in how general education teachers are prepared by teacher-education programs, certified by states and evaluated by local education agencies, or LEAs, is essential. By making sure that the special needs of ELLs are addressed at multiple stages of the teacher preparation process, schools may gain higher quality

After many phone conversations, messages left, and emails with different ESL teachers and board of education members, information regarding English Language Learner (ELL) placement assessments were finally found. Schools need to provide an appropriate and equal education for students with different skill levels in many different areas. Luckily there are many formal assessments available to schools to not only assess student academic skills but their English language proficiency as well. Joplin School District’s policies are governed, for the most part, by state and federal mandates. This is because it is a public school district that receives federal funding; making public schools responsible for upholding the standards set forth by the

English learners are currently the fastest developing student population in schools today. This makes it extremely important to provide these students with the programs and services they deserve. Providing a strong education for ELL students is what I personally believe to be an asset in America’s future. Today there are many challenges I believe teachers and students face when it comes to instruction and assessments.

I believe the school endeavours to provide as much variety of opportunity as possible to allow each child to find something they are good at. The mission and aims show that the school recognises the diverse nature of its children and families, and their individual faiths, cultures and abilities and encourages its

Patient J.B. presented the office with chief complaints of coughs and sore throat that lasted about seven days. These symptoms are typically seen in respiratory tract infection or inflammation that is caused by viruses or bacteria. The initial differential diagnoses included Influenza, cough, common cold, community-acquired pneumonia, acute bronchitis, acute pharyngitis, and postnasal drip syndrome based on the chief complaints. The reason that why these differential diagnoses were considered is because they all have coughs as the symptom. Some of these differential diagnoses have both coughs and sore throat. JD, et al. (2017) states that Influenza A or B viruses can cause a dry cough and sore throat. Troullos,

English Language Learners face a variety of unique challenges when compared to their non-ELL peers. For example, when assessing new English Language Learners, once such challenge is the lack of effective assessment tools. Many of the available instruments are not culturally relevant to the ELL student’s background, nor created at an appropriate level for their developing English language skills. Another challenge is the lack of availability of qualified education professionals, who are equipped to meet their specific needs linguistically. Language and cultural differences may serve to put ELL students at an academic disadvantage, regardless of whether they possess normal cognitive skills. For the educator and student alike, this matter is further complicated when an ELL is affected by a learning disability. In this essay, I will discuss some special factors and issues that an ELL professional may encounter when assessing an ELL student, and attempting to determine the cause of a language difficulty; whether it occurs because of normal language acquisition issues, or because of an underlying learning disability that calls for special education intervention and support.

As a student in the Educational Doctorate (EdD) program, I had the unique opportunity to assist in the development and analysis of a qualitative method study designed to investigate the doctoral student experience at Lindenwood University (LU). Even though my primary role in the study was as principle investigator, I also was part of the eight doctoral students currently enrolled in Qualitative Methods who participated in the study. An inductive approach was applied to the data collected from the study with “little to no predetermined theory, structure, or framework” (Burnard, Gill, Stewart, Treasure, & Chadwick, 2008). Student responses were coded to identify

However, mainstreaming of these students has led to high failure rates among these students. Statistically speaking, of the total amount of educators currently teaching, less than 30 % of educators those are qualified to teach these students. Correspondingly, Less than 17 percent of colleges offering certification have courses that prepare the students for working with ESL/ELL students. Of the total population of teachers on campus, less than 26% of the teachers have received professional development related to instructional practices for these students. Furthermore, out of the 50 states in the United States only 20 of these states require that teacher have training with working with ESL and ELL students as a requirement of for employment. Moreover, these ESL/ELL students had higher dropout rates as among other students in schools. Waggoner's (1999) nationwide study of new immigrant students in the US aged 14 to 19 showed that one in five foreign-born minority-Ll students were a dropout, whereas the dropout rate among monolingual English-speaking natives was one in 12. In New York State, 32% of LEP (limited English proficiency) students dropped out of high school in 2001 after the state began to require passing the academically demanding and rigorous examinations for high school graduation (Crawford, 2004); typically,

Assessment is essential as the information gathered is how the students are progressing to the learning outcomes and performance standards. Upon completing this artifact, it is recognized how assessments impact how instruction should be delivered, and recognizing that all students will learn differently. As an educator, flexibility and adapting to the diverse learning environment is necessary to ensure all students are grasping the material. Realizing there are those who do not test well and trying to find ways to assess those skills through class discussions or group work while encouraging the students and praising them for their efforts. Designing and creating unique ways to ensure all students are learning the material and meeting the objectives and goals set forth in the lesson plan. It is the responsibility of an educator to develop goals that will reinforce lesson plans, lectures, and instruction. Those students who have an IEP modifications will be made based on their IEP recommendations. For ESL/ELL students in the class, modifications will be made on a case by case as recommending to ensure the students are successfully meeting their learning goals to their fullest