Students Should Not Get Paid For Good Grades

    Why do almost all students dread school? Though the answer may differ between different people, the main reason why most students dread school is because we have to go to school almost everyday and work, receiving no reward. There is nothing to look forward to in school and though the idea may sound absurd, students should get paid for good grades. School is work, it’s difficult and it takes up our entire day, filling the rest of our free time with homework or topics to study. If we got paid for doing good in school, then we would be encouraged to keep up the hard work and we would put more effort in school. Meaning that the next generation of adults would be well educated and would benefit society in many ways. Getting paid for good grades would also help us see the responsibility that comes with money. It would also help prepare us for life after school because we would know how to spend our money wisely, so in other words, students should get paid for good grades because school is work, we would be more encouraged to be diligent and we would learn the responsibility that comes with money.

Student athletes that play football or any sports in college should not get paid. Colleges use almost all their money that they have for athletes on your scholarship and on the uniforms and any other needs the team has. Paying the athletes that play sports means you would have to pay all the other players that play sports as well. The money would also vary between players because of the sport they play and because of their skill and talent. Money would also vary on the dominance of the sports that is at your school which means if your University is big on football then football players would get paid more than any other sport or if your school is big on basketball then the basketball players would get paid more than any other player or sport attending the School.

In America, most college students graduate facing a lot of built up debt. However, most student athletes are not included in this since they receive scholarships that help them afford the costs of their education, living arrangement, and food. Some people believe that student-athletes should be paid since they have to divide their time in sports and school while others do not share the same belief since it is the students’ choice. Student athletes should not get paid for playing on their universities’ team since they are already getting paid throughout their college years with scholarships, they should be focused on their academics, and paying the players would damage the integrity of the game.

I think they should because the more money they get the more they want to learn.

The athletes are already getting paid enough not just in tuition. They get the best gyms to workout in, free health insurance for injuries, transportation, food and they get free uniforms & equipment for their sport. So why do athletes need to get paid money if college students/ college student athletes have bad money hobbits like spending their too money too quickly. Paying the athletes will make the problem worse the athlete will just spend money faster and quicker then he already is. Students barely put themselves on a budget just imagine a college athlete getting paid in cash. Now while they are some good reason while athlete should not get paid there are some flaws with their argument. By paying the student athlete money the coaches will

Getting paid for good grades has changed many people's lives and also changed their grades and knowledge. Wouldn't you want money for grades change your life too? Kids should get paid for grades to help the people who can't afford a simple,nice meal. Also, to keep their grades up and act like school is their job, because basically, it is. To begin with, many families need the money to survive and thrive.

Most Americans play sports, maultiple children and adults play sports that they love.One of the most famous sports in America is football.People play it in college and many want to get paid for it.KIds get scolerships so they don’t have to pay it themselves. College students should not be paid while playing in college sports.

Giving your children money for satisfying grades that they get doesn't benefit them with their career that they will have as adults. Let me back this up. If they get paid for the super grades that they received they will soon have an expectation that everything good that they do they should receive something in return. This makes kids not try to the best of their ability because these children know

Would students be able to improve their grades if they were getting paid? Money is a great reward for most students and it could possibly have a long term effect on students. They are always wanting their grades to be improved and then they would have more of a reason to study for test and quizzes if they were getting paid do go to school. Students would be focused at school if their was money to be made by going to school. Teachers would also not be stopping as often because of students getting of track. I believe students would improve their grades if they were getting paid because, Money could have a long term effect, and more student could need a little more motivation

The article “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades” was written by Amy McCready. McCready explains that parents should “inspire a love of learning, cultivate good habits and allow children to plot their own course, they will truly flourish.” Throughout the article McCready provides reasons that serve as evidence for this main idea. McCready explains that school is not just about grades, but also about how well children develop key skills for later in their life. Also, McCready explains that children will not be rewarded for every job well done in the future, and if parents continue to pay for grades children will expect a reward for everything they do well.

In the article, “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades,” Amy McCready details her argument against children receiving money as a reward for good grades. Her main point is expressed in her article as a sentence: “But no matter how much we want it to, money can’t buy smarts, motivation, or school success.” She is expressing her idea that paying kids will not genuinely help them. Within the article, McCready expresses her dislike of parents using payment to attempt to encourage student achievement. Her points include her belief that paying children won’t maintain high grades because kids lose interest and excitement over time. She also believes that payment for grades creates a negative attitude within the children and invoke a sense of entitlement.

Parents need to show their kids that they care about their grades and how they do in school. Showing the kids that they care will motivate them to do better to impress their mom or dad. My parents always showed an interest in my academic achievements so I was motivated to do better. I was always excited to go home and show them my next test grade because I knew they would be

One time, I got a good grade and my grandma gave me money. If school is truly wants student to be motivated to do well in the school should pay student for a better grade. Motivate student prepares them for high school higher test score. From better graduation rates for learning about work making kids smarter there are many positive effects of paying student for a higher grade.

Motivating students with money has reached Washington DC area from their effort. The author thinks maybe it's not so bad getting paid for good grades. He thinks it doesn't hurt to try new things. He stated about his daughter getting paid for good grades and she started doing better. But , that's not the only thing they want to do with the money of portraying students to do better. They also want to use it to train teachers and give students more time to learn. I intend to also use this source to help formulate my arguments about if students should be paid for good

Realistically the argument made by Ariana Prothero is that paying students might be a good thing, but stylistically it doesn't work in every case. Taking research from an outside source, about an incentive program in college where a man named Roland Fryer put six million dollars into eighteen thousand low income students to try to improve test performance. In the end, the takeaway is that students feel more entitled to have a reward of an output more so than input. Therefore meaning some students, test scores aren't going to improve, because they don't know how to improve them. So students would rather get money after they know what grade they have other than, having a requirement to meet. It's probably way too much pressure for them to have on themselves.