Subprime Lending

It’s a risk that these investors took where in the end, they were financially hurt by it due to the part of the subprime lenders acting unethically. Not only the subprime lenders, but also the investors because they started to loose their standards once the subprime mortgages were booming and becoming more profitable. The investors were blinded by the profit and not paying attention to the qualities of business and the loans. Once the investors started to loose their standards, that’s when the subprime mortgages were being overlooked in which they were hurt by it.

Since mid 1990s, the subprime mortgage market has grown rapidly experiencing a phenomenal 23% compound annual growth rate to 2006. The total subprime loan originations increased from $65 billion in 1995 to $613 billion in 2006. The subprime sector has become a significant sub-sector of the total residential market accounting for 21% of all residential mortgage originations in 2006. Similarly, by year-end 2006, total outstanding balance of subprime loans grew to $1.2 trillion, approximately 12.6% of all outstanding mortgage debt.

Subprime lending became prevalent in the early 2000’s when property values were sky-rocketing and many Americans thought they would fulfill their home ownership dreams, by obtaining loans they may not otherwise qualify for. A subprime loan is a loan offered to an individual who does not qualify for a loan at the prime rate due to their credit history. Subprime loans have higher interest rates because of the risk that the lender is taking. During the early 2000’s the housing market was great for homebuyers, since interest rates where low and property values

The financial crisis emerged because of an excessive deregulation of business operation of financial institutions and of abusing the securitization mechanism in the absence of clearly defined rules to regulate this area in the American mortgage market (Krstić, Jemović, & Radojičić, 2013). Deregulation gives larger banks the opportunity to loosen underwriting lender guidelines and generate increase opportunity for homeownership (Kroszner & Strahan, 2013). After deregulation, banks utilized many versions of mortgage loans. Mortgage loans such as subprime and Alternative-A paper loans became available for borrowers challenged to find mortgage lenders before deregulation (Elbarouki, 2016; Palmer, 2015). The housing market has been severely affected by fluctuating interest rates and the requirement of large down payment (Follain, & Giertz, 2013). The subprime lending crisis has taken a toll on the nation’s economy since 2007. Individuals who lacked sufficient credit ratings or down payments resorted to subprime mortgages to finance their homes Defaults on subprime and other mortgages precipitated the foreclosure crisis, which contributed to the recent recession and national financial crisis (Odetunde, 2015). Subprime mortgages were appropriate for borrowers with substandard credit and Alternate-A paper loans were

A few years later the market took a turn for the worse, where interest rates were on the rise, and homes were losing their value quickly. Now borrowers that were in these interest only ARM’s needed to refinance these loans because the rates were going up, to a point where the homeowner was not be able to afford the payment. The Federal Reserve tried to stimulate the economy by lowering interest rates during the recession in early 2001, from over 6% in 2000, to a rate just above 1.25% in 2002. These low rates encouraged many Americans to apply for loans for homes that a few years ago they would have not been able to. To encourage the homeownership boom, the Bush administration urged Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to allot more money for low-income borrowers so they could buy their own homes. This resulted in the subprime mortgage

Ultimately these lenders mortgages to people with poor credit and a high risk to default. Lenders were willing to make give out these subprime mortgages for countless reasons. Firstly these lenders had large amounts of funds to lend because strong economy leading up to recession. With this abundant capital lenders were willing to make riskier loans to help increase their investment returns. Lenders also thought these subprime mortgages were less risky than usual because rates were low, the economy was healthy and in general individuals were making their payments. The amount of subprime mortgages went from 173 billion in 2001 to 665 billion in 2005. A second reason for why lenders were giving out these subprime loans is due to personal greed and selfishness. Many heads of banks made huge bonuses based on high volumes and fraudulent appraisals. One way these lenders were able to do more volume was through mortgage fraud for profit. Mortgage fraud for profit is a illegal practice committed by industry professional who misrepresent or omit important information about their client’s employment, income, credit or property value with the goal of maximizing their own profits. The FBI found 63,713 cases of mortgage fraud during the year of 2008 alone and 46,717 during the year of 2007. They found out that in many low-credit, low income ZIP codes buyer income was overstated

First, everyone who has bought a house themselves, or has been near the process of home buying, knows that first time home buyers make mistakes. They get wrapped up in the charm of a house while failing to notice issues, and failing to notice even minor issues can have very costly consequences. For many of the victims of subprime lending this was their first time being able to purchase a house which likely made them become wrapped in the emotions of home buying. Rather than, looking at the houses and prices

When making a subprime loan it is the responsibility of the lender to discern whether the loan is a good risk for the borrower and the lender. If the loan is going to be a poor risk to the borrower

Subprime loans started out as a generous, philanthropic idea. Giving people who had bad credit the opportunity to own a home regardless of their income or past credit issues showed compassion and caring for the poor, middle class and elderly who couldn’t possibly qualify for a home loan under the previous strict lending standards.

There is no doubt that subprime lending was a major cause of the Recession. It was a tactic used by investment banks in order to get more money from unsuspecting homeowners. However, lenders found out that most of the people who were qualified to have a mortgage already had one. In turn, the lenders had to lower their credit criteria for people to take out a loan on a house. This is how the term subprime lending came to be in the financial world. As a result of subprime lending, the investors were able to make millions off of these mortgages. People who qualified for a subprime mortgage usually had a credit score below that of 620. To make the subprime mortgage deal more customer friendly, the lending banks decided to have the people who qualified for these mortgages didn’t have to have a down payment. Normally, the down payment would be as much as 20%, but this made it easier for people to get mortgages without having to worry about how much money they needed at the beginning of their purchase. “ Many American homeowners bought houses they could not afford,

Subprime loans are ethical tools which were wildly misused during the time leading up to the financial crisis in 2008-2009. Subprime lending targeted borrowers who would typically not qualify for standard loans for various reasons. These included low credit scores, low income, and history of late payments. The loans were offered at a rate higher than the market rate due to the increased risks of the borrowers. Many of the clients Countrywide supported were much less likely to be able to pay off their loans compared to traditional borrowers. In the years leading up to the financial crisis, the real estate industry was flourishing which encouraged even clients who could not afford fancy houses to use subprime loans to finance their homes.

Before we discuss the first question let’s get a working description of what subprime leaning is. A subprime lender is financial entity that has an inclination to lend to consumers that are not qualified for traditional loans due to their poor credit status and history of repayment difficulties. Lending to subprime candidates helped lead to secondary mortgage market issue sin 2008 (“Subprime lender,” 2011). A subprime loan is a loan with elevated fees and interest, given to someone with a lower credit score (“Subprime

The company’s incentive system also encouraged brokers and sales representatives to move borrowers into the subprime category, even if their financial position meant that they belonged higher up the loan spectrum. Brokers who peddled subprime loans received commissions of 0.50 percent of the loan’s value, versus 0.20 percent on loans one step up the quality ladder. For years, a software system in Countrywide’s subprime unit, sales representatives used to calculate the loan type that a borrower qualified for, did not allow the input of a borrower’s cash reserves (Morgenson, 2007).

One of the first indications of the late 2000 financial crisis that led to downward spiral known as the “Recession” was the subprime mortgages; known as the “mortgage mess”. A few years earlier the substantial boom of the housing market led to the uprising of mortgage loans. Because interest rates were low, investors took advantage of the low rates to buy homes that they could in return ‘flip’ (reselling) and homeowners bought homes that they typically wouldn’t have been able to afford. High interest rates usually keep people from borrowing money because it limits the amount available to use for an investment. But the creation of the subprime mortgage

Due to such events as the subprime mortgage crisis, the auto market and Wall Street’s failure, the United States suffered a severe economic blow. Looking at the situation from an economic view, supply is supposed to equal demand. Due to the mortgage crisis and the careless attempts of some to make money, there is a superfluous amount of empty homes throughout the United States. In the subprime mortgage crisis, the nature of the failure was the inability to account for money given to individuals, who lack the appropriate requirements. In order to obtain a loan, collateral is needed. References were not being checked and poor credit history went ignored. People were obtaining loans and not paying attention to the interests rates associated. “This time around, the slack standards allowed millions of high-risk borrowers to get easy home mortgages. When this so-called subprime market collapsed beginning about a year ago, ordinary working people bore the brunt” (Gallagher, 2008). Companies were so anxious to place people in homes, that it cost them billions of dollars and