Successful Accession of Crimea to Russia Essay

annexation of Crimea back to Russia fixed the violation of Soviet law in 1954. This annexation

The essay effectively proved its point that sanctions should not be placed on Russia as that would be an error that can lead to another world war. The lengthy buildup of the comparison between World War One and the conflicts in Ukraine

Since then, the peninsula has been administered as two Russian federal subjects- the Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol, which, until 2016, were grouped in the Crimean Federal District. The annexation was brought by a military intervention by Russia in Crimea, which took place in the aftermath of the 2014 Ukrainian revolution and was part of wider unrest across southern and eastern Ukraine. On February 22, Russian President Vladimir Putin conducted an all-night meeting with security services chiefs to discuss elimination of the Ukrainian President, Viktor Yanukovych, and at the end of that meeting Putin had stated that, "We must start working on returning Crimea to Russia." On February 23, 2014, pro-Russian acts were held in the Crimean city of Sevastopol. On February 27 masked Russian troops without markings took over the Supreme Council of Crimea, and captured strategic sites across Crimea, which led to the installation of the pro-Russian Aksyonov government in Crimea, and making the Crimean status and the declaration of Crimea's independence on March 16, 2014. Then, only two days later, Russia claimed

In Putin’s administration, he has made great effort to try to kind of reestablish Russia’s identity，or in other words, to put Russia back on the position it deserves. Thus, this kind of ambivalence or struggling has become almost the main theme in domestic and foreign policies of today’s Russia, which has impact when it comes to its priorities, challenges and strategies.

Ukrainian President, Petro Poroshenko, later said on national television that he would raise the issue of "the rights of the Tatars of Crimea" at the General Assembly of the United Nations later this month.

In 2013 as Ukraine was negotiating with the European Union, President Putin was also conducting secret meetings with the president of Ukraine. These secret meetings helped sway the President of Ukraine to decide against joining the union and striking a deal with Russia for oil and natural gas. This was the starting point for the Ukrainian revolution in 2014. The Ukrainian President found refuge in Russia after he was exiled for his decision to join Russia and not the European Union. Now with Ukraine in disarray, Putin had a new plan; he secretly sent soldiers into Crimea. Putin saw Crimea as a vital piece of land that could help Russia by giving them a seaport, which is more accessible to the rest of the world. This would also give Russia the chance to strengthen their navy by giving them a more direct route to the west in order to defend themselves from the west. Starting October 2014 reports surfaced that there were troops in Crimea. Putin and Russia’s government denied all claims that the troops were Russian soldiers. By March 2, 2015, Russia acknowledged that they had sent troops to the border of Ukraine to protect Russia from any actions towards Russia. By March 16, Russia announced that troops are in Ukraine and that they held the majority of the government buildings in Crimea. This sparked the first set of sanctions from the west. Mostly economic, Russia was able to hold out and not be affected by these sanctions. The second set of sanctions hit their businesses and many of Putin’s friends, which he appointed. This is when Putin started to negotiate with the west. Crimea then held a vote to see if they would join Russia or stay part of Ukraine. 90% voted in favor of joining Russia. Putin’s controversial and secretive acts had paid off and Crimea is now part of

Many Russian today consider the North Caucasus to be a “separate but unequal entity”, and “the belief that the republics of the North Caucasus are not part of the Russian Federation is a sentiment that is now shared by 60 percent of Russia’s population” (Rodeheffer, 2013, para. 5). In order to increase stability in the region, Russia must begin to reintroduce control of the North Caucasus to those who reside in the area. The Russian army appears to be little more than an occupation force, as no officers from the Caucasus exist, and military commanders admit that “ an unspoken policy of discriminating against North Caucasians exists not only at the conscript level but throughout the entire chain of command” (Rodeheffer, 2013, para. 6). If control is given in increments back to the natives, and the brutal police-state like restrictions are relaxed, Caucasians may be less drawn to the radical islamic movements which are drawing in many youth from the region

The main question being asked here in this essay is whether or not Mearsheimer's account of the Ukraine Crisis in his article titled “Why the Ukraine Crisis was the West's fault” is entirely convincing to the reader and whether or not they agree with his controversial opinion on the crisis. In his account of the Ukraine Crisis, Mearsheimer assesses the point that Putin’s tactics and actions for this crisis do not necessarily show a good attempt to build a greater Russian empire. He focuses here on Putin’s decision makings, assessing them critically. Mearsheimer argues in his account that there are three major reasons for why the West has caused the Ukrainian crisis and forced Putin to intervene in Ukraine: Eastern enlargement of NATO, enlargement

This also connects to the promotion of peace and disarmament. To make peace the mutual respect and collaboration between people is very important, and in this situation the respect of the Crimean’s rights is not present. Peace is the fruit of justice, and in this Crimea, justice has not yet been served and this must be

Their geography shows Ukraine’s crucial position. Their territory reaches far into modern Russia, but it shares borders with many EU members, including Poland and Hungary. This leads to political crisis between

The controversial Russian military intervention in Ukraine in 2014 depicts lawless arrogant image of Putin. Putin was responsible for invading Ukraine by deploying more than ten thousands armies in eastern Ukraine for more than a year. The civil war broke in Ukraine. The article, “The World May See An Even Darker Side Of Putin” depicted devastated consequences of war:

President Putin does not put much faith into the long-term cooperation with states either, which is another ideal of realism (Week Two Lessons 2015). In his address to the Federal Assembly concerning the developments in the Ukraine, he speaks about how the agreement signed by Ukraine and the European Union is weak, is not working, and is destroying Ukraine (Putin 2014). He also believes the West is not willing to help Ukraine

While Mr. Putin’s vanguard military apparatus was taking over Crimea, Syria’s self styled hitherto President Bashar Assad was writing a letter of congratulation for Vladimir Putin’s “wise policy” and his efforts to restore “security and stability” in Kiev after an “attempted coup” by “terrorist extremists.” What is happening in Crimea today mirrors what has happened and unceasingly happening in Syria with multiplied brutality. Russia’s military involvement in Crimea shouldn’t come as a surprise to the US or the west at large. The European Union and the United States have wanted Ukraine to tilt into their geopolitical axis, but, alike with Syria, they wanted it at a discount rate and hence now it is too late.

This term paper essay entitled “Ukraine-Russia Conflict: Dispute Settlement over Crimea” will focusing on the conflict that happened between Russia and Ukraine especially on the dispute settlement conflict over the Ukraine’s territory, Crimea. This essay will begin with introduction and background history on the Russia-Ukraine relationship. Causes of conflict between the nations, the importance and role played by Crimea in the Russia-Ukraine conflict also will be list out as the theoretical framework of this essay. For the finding of study, this essay will focus on the involvement and intervention of Russia in Crimea before move on to the consequences and solutions that might be taken to end the conflict in Crimea.

For my essay I’ve chosen the topic: ‘Ukraine as a ‘bridge’ between Russia and EU’. I found it really interesting, especially in current situation, after the Presidential elections. And, of course, the topic is very important to me, as I’m Ukrainian and studying in the country, which belongs to EU. In this paper it would be considered: reasons of forming of current situation in Ukraine; relationships and perspective of development of them with Russia; relationships and perspective of development of them with EU; current situation after Presidential elections and outcomes of influences it could have on further position of Ukraine on the international arena.