Sugar Addiction Thesis

“Soda Taxes: Gaining Steam or Getting Steamrolled?” is an enticing article by Anna Gorman that focuses on the issue of taxing sugary beverages and the effect it will ultimately have on the health of the general population. She mentions that the tax could reduce the rates of obesity and diabetes in the affected areas. She also points out the counter to this claim, that soda taxes may not have any effect on obesity rates at all and may give the government too much power over the consumer choice. Overall, she seems to advocate that soda is an unhealthy beverage and should be cut down among consumers. Soda however, is not the only unhealthy options out there. There is a plethora of products on the shelves of supermarkets and sold at restaurants.

The debate on weather sugary drinks, especially soda, should be taxed or not has been a topic for years. Some people believe that they should be taxed for the improvement of health while on the other hand some people think that taxing the drinks won't do much and actually hurt people. Taxing sugary drinks is helpful to those who have a hard time with temptation for the drinks. In the article "Do Soda Taxes Really Work?" Sifferlin states that when researchers looked at Berkeley residents, they found that when taxing soda started "sales of sugary-sweetened drinks fell by close 10% and sales of water increased in Berkeley by about 16%" (4) Just by the percent difference rasing prices on soda made people decide against buying the sweet drinks,

Today, research asserts soda is one of the leading causes of poor health outcomes in the United States. People define soda as carbonated beverages, or soft drinks, or fizzy drinks. A significant relationship exists between the consumption of carbonated drinks and obesity, type 2 diabetes and dental caries in the United States (Gollust et al., 52). Tax on soda is considered as a government’s intervention to regulate the consumption of these kinds of drinks. In fact, soda should be taxed in the United States because it discourages the consumption of soda, makes people healthier, and raises government funds.

Sugar tax will not help to solve health or budget issues to reduce debt. Sugar has caused many problems such as revenue and health problems. Firstly, sugar drinks has a high cost on the society, and the overconsumption of sugar causes lots of health problems such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, tooth decay and heart diseases “Already we know that the burden of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases are greater among population of socioeconomic status “ (Riediger,year, para 14). Sugar is addiction and it mainly affects to people who have low incomes , not because they can’t buy , but they don’t have enough knowledge on how it might affect them back since they have a low literacy even though, dozen of cities and states have launched public

One of the biggest health concerns facing children in the United States to is childhood obesity. Childhood obesity has grown to become a major epidemic all across the nation effecting millions of children both physically and emotionally. One of the biggest contributors to this public health issue is sugar sweetened beverages. Sugar-sweetened beverages are an unregulated and out control beverages that is being consumed by millions of children each and every day. Progress is being made on the local level to treat and control this concern, but in order to truly make a difference a federal policy needs to be implemented. This federal policy needs to tax sugar-sweetened beverages to encourage consumer to make healthier and cheaper choices. A federal

There are several stances on the argument on whether or not sugary drinks should be taxed. Sugary drinks should not be taxed because it will not stop people from buying them, it isn’t the only answer to health issues, and it may even hurt small businesses. Putting a tax on sugar filled drinks will not stop everybody from buying them. In the article, “Soda Pop: To Tax Or Not To Tax” by Sherry on fudiet.com it explains how the tax would not greatly impact the consuption of these drinks, “Thirty three states now have taxes on sodas but no evidence currently exists that taxes have impacted consumption. It is suggested that taxes have been too small to impact consumption...The problem is we do not know how large a tax needs to be to be effective. Statistical models project that 20% tax would have an effect, but this has not been tested. More evidence of the amount of tax is needed and

The latest attack on America’s expanding waistlines is aimed at your wallet, as health advocates and lawmakers hope to tax consumers out of drinking so many sugary drinks.In Philadelphia, which hosted last week's Democratic convention, a tax of 1.5 cents per ounce on sugary drinks, and even on artificially sweetened diet drinks, will go into effect in January — making it the first major city with a soda tax. Voter initiatives for similar taxes will be on the November ballot in Oakland, San Francisco and Albany, Calif., and likely in Boulder, Colo. A similar measure passed in Berkeley, Calif., in

With the increase in the number of the diseases and awareness regarding the health care system, Sugar tax is the simple remedy which will not only reduce the sales of the drinks but also lower the kilojoule intake leading to reduction in the body weight and ultimately improvement in the heath. The sugar-sweetened beverages are less healthy than other sources of added sugars and calories and are more likely to contribute to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay than other foods. According to the recent research diet soda and artificial sweeteners contained in diet soda may adversely affect glucose levels and may increase the risk of developing metabolic syndrome and diabetes, in part, through impairment of glucose and increase in waist circumference.

What is there to like about a tax that makes you rearrange your life to buy groceries and soda? Instead of doing things you normally would want to do, you have to rearrange your life to go buy soda and groceries. Sugary drinks should not be taxed, it causes frustration and doesn’t solve the obesity problem.

Firstly, sugary drinks lead to health problems such as obesity and diabetes. Many countries have admitted the potential of a tax on sugary drinks (Sacks, Martin & Veerman 2016) According to a research, it would save 1,600 lives, preventing 4,400 heart attacks and 1,100 strokes for the next 25 years by raising 20% of the price of soft drinks (Sacks, Martin & Veerman 2016). This policy will result in people to consume less sugary beverages, connecting to decreased BMIs, reduced incidences of disease after that reduced deaths (Cormack 2016). The effect of increasing a price will be conspicuous to people who drink many sugary drinks (Sacks, Martin & Veerman).

One reason sugary drinks should be taxed is it decreases the high risks of health problems. Critics argue that people are in charge of what they drink. While that may be true, the government tries to keep others from being unhealthy for their own good. There would be less risks of childhood obesity, type 2 diabetes, and much more. Dr. Jeff Ritterman, a cardiologist, said, “ Solid foods produce satiety. You get full. You get full when you eat a piece of cake. You don’t get full when you drink the soda, even

“What happens to your brain when you give up sugar?” To be honest, I have a terrible addiction to chocolate, cotton candy, and Swedish fish. This is not a good thing at all. Some of the people that are reading this are probably saying, “Why don’t you just stop eating candy then”. There is more to it than that. Most people eat a lot sugar, and then expect to just give it up like that. Well, giving up candy comes with crazy physical problems. Another example of what happens to your brain when you give up sugar is making you more anxious. Finally, one more example of what happens to your brain when you give up sugar is you start to feel depressed.

People need freedom. There should be NO tax on sugary drinks. But there is obesity and diabetes and if there was a tax It could help many people out. The tax will help to put an end to diabetes and obesity. The tax also could help people not spend on unhealthy foods and drinks. There should be a tax on sugary drinks because it could help many people.

Even though these people only occasionally consume these foods, they will be unduly punished for the habits and decisions of others to whom they have no relation whatsoever. The consequence of a sugar tax is that it will penalize both those who enjoy an occasional treat as part of a balanced diet, as well as over-consumers. Tax on food and drink puts unnecessary pressure on responsible consumers. It will place the greatest encumbrance on the financially unstable, who spend a larger quantity of their income on their nutritional needs. Most consumers make responsible decisions, but a tax will punish them for the choices of those who do

Considering that soft drinks are one of the most popular drinks to a lot of people all around the world, unfortunately, a lot of them love to drink it almost every day and may not live without it. Soda becomes addictive, preventing one from drinking what the body needs the most which is water. In the market, there is a infinite amount of choices with multiple varieties of flavors, different tastes, ranges from classic soda to diet soda. However, consumers do not recognize clearly the negative effect of soft drinks that have a high chance of eroding their health away. Some of these examples include dental erosion, energy intake, obesity and other health issues. Nowadays, people live a healthy life to avoid health problems, so taxes on soft