Sugar Rebellion Research Paper

The 18th century can be marked as a period of internal and external struggle for the American colonists. From improper representation, to unfair taxes, such as the Stamp Act, to being overall abused by Britain, the colonists were justifiably angry. From this anger, the slogan “No taxation without representation” was born and quickly began to emerge from the lips of almost every colonist all across America. The demand from colonists everywhere for no taxation without representation weighed heavily as a symbol for democracy, as it revealed the mindset of many – Britain was using the hardworking colonists and took their money without even giving them a say – and laid the foundation for the American revolutionary war, allowing more arguments and

In 1768 an agreement was published by leader’s colonists called Boston Non-Importation Agreement inviting others colonists to react against the Townshend acts, in which American colonists would not export or import items from Great Britain. In the agreement was wrote “Secondly, that we will not send for or import any kind of goods or merchandize from Great Britain, either on our own account, or on commissions, or any otherwise, from the 1st of January 1769 to the 1st of January 1770, except salt, coals, fish-hooks and lines, hemp, and duck bar lead and shot, wool-cards and card-wire.” (Boston Non-Importation Agreement). In addition, a group of women, the Daughters of Liberty were organized a boycott to oppose British taxes by avoiding British tea and buying British goods in support to the Sons of Liberty. Some of the acts were cancel, however, the tea tax results in the Boston Tea Party in 1770. Last, in 1774, the First Continental Congress take place in Philadelphia by colonist’s leaders in reaction of the British tyranny, in which delegates from Massachusetts to Virginia colonies united to agree that “Parliament had no right to tax the colonies without their consent.” (Fraser 132). Indeed, the American colonist’s leaders came together with many protests to the overwhelming British taxations and they rejected British authorities by showing that the government could not claim authority over colonists

The sugar rush that took place in the form of the boom in slave driven sugar production during the early modern period of European history had a significant impact on social and economic issues of the day. Sugar was a delicacy at the time and Europeans were providing the demand that fueled the engine of sugar production. The viewpoints of planters and slaves demonstrate a complex dynamic that are almost complete opposites. The early modern economic and social systems of sugar production consisted of artistic influence in addition to new challenges and dangers, which ultimately led to slaves being robbed by planters of the right to make any change in their social or economic standing.

England 's introduction of the intolerable acts upon American colonists created a ripple effect which they did not anticipate, which completely changed the views of many colonists. These colonists went on to become the voices that fueled the American Revolutionary War and spread the messages of liberty, freedom, and a new way of life. Some voices stood out more so than the rest, their names became etched in our history books their thoughts and beliefs paving the way for the Revolution. One such colonist is James Otis wrote a series of patriotic pamphlets outlining his views on the colonies state of affairs , one of those pamphlets is The Rights of British Colonies Asserted and Proved written in 1763. In The Rights of British Colonies Asserted and Proved James Otis outlines his perspectives on government 's rights and the rights of the people , these perspectives revolutionized colonial opinions and made famous the quote” no taxation without representation.”

They formed many groups and executed riots to protest against this serious disregard of human rights and pride. One way they combated this crude injustice was The Boston Tea Party. At this time, Britain was taxing America’s tea heavily, an imposition that the colonists did not agree to. Rebels involved were members of The Sons of Liberty, colonists vying for freedom and individual rights. The rebels dressed as Native Americans and stormed an incoming boat carrying a fresh load of tea. They dumped the tea into the Boston Harbor as a form of protest; a refusal to pay Britain’s taxes. John Adam, in The Boston Tea Party (Doc. 2) concludes that Britain’s actions have created a much larger and public form of protest. More rebels were coming out into the open as the revolution gains momentum. This proves that the taxation aggravated the colonists as the abuse accumulated, urging them towards rebellion. Colonists also took up tarring as a form of discipline as a response to taxes created during the Stamp Acts. Angry Americans poured hot tar over tax collectors and covered them in feathers to express their displeasure at the imposed taxes. Those fortunate enough to avoid this public humiliation fled or became too scared to go about their collecting duties. In a letter from John Hancock regarding the Stamp Act (Doc. 4), he stresses that these taxes wrongly pressed upon them didn’t have to be

The British provided sources of entertainment and ways to see information like newspapers and other forms of entertainment, but charged us a hefty amount. Many of us wanted to complain but we were not allowed to have a seat on the British Parliament. Without this, we have no way of communicating our problems. How could the British tax us without having someone to represent us? We were being taxed without representation and we were tired of it! The British had taken off all the taxes except tea, and that was not enough. With no fair ruling, we took matters into our own hands and dumped the tea into the Boston Harbor.

Historian, Clinton Rossiter stated that the Stamp Act had an “overwhelming refusal to obey” because the colonists were not going to allow their independence to be taken from their firm grip. Because of the threatening debt, Britain required certain colonies to provide food and shelter for British troops in an effort to save money. This Quartering Act in 1765 took more than the colonist’s money; it took their sense of security and their privacy. Americans could no longer feel safe knowing that Britain’s power to protect was growing weaker, and since the British troops still had more authority over the colonist’s, they could search the colonists’ homes and obtain personal information about them. Similarly, the tax on tea in 1773 in the colonies proved that the British were at fault for a rebellion from the colonists and that the Boston Tea Party was inevitable.

Starting after the termination of the Seven-Year’s war, by the Peace of Paris, England repeatedly violated the American Colonists’ rights. A series of events, happening between 1763(ending of the Seven-Years’ war) and 1775 (starting of the revolution), could be taken as motives for the American’s revolution. The Americans claimed that through both, the Sugar Act (1764) and the Stamp Act (1765), the British dishonored their rights to taxation. The Townshend Acts also infuriated the Americans, and as in all other circumstances, they were willing to fight for their rights. The final justification for the

The King and the parliament believed to pay back war debts taxes were the only way. The tax that put the most tension on the colonies was in 1767 and it was tax on imported tea.”It has come about through the gathering of the testimony of contemporary witness of undoubted competency and through the researches of many scholars” (Beard 3).The people living in the colonies believed they were not governed by England s didn't have to follow England's tax. The 13 colonies held a convention to try and talk to the British government but they were not being heard. So one night the colonist in Boston Massachusetts decided to go dump the tea on ships into the water. This is one of the most iconic revolts during the time period.The British government would shut down the Boston port to show authority. The colonist did not want to pay the taxes because they felt they were not part of England anymore and England needed someone to pay back the debts.This clearly shows that economics drove the American

The Patriots demand liberty, freedom, consent, and representation in the colonies. As heard in the Provincial Congress, many Patriots want to revolt against the British tyranny. The Boston Tea Party is a prime example of the Patriot’s reaction to British rule. The Sons of Liberty dumped tea into the Boston Harbor due to the Tea Act. The British are threatening us with their standing armies and other unjust taxes, such as the Quartering Act and the Intolerable Acts. In the Consideration on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes, Daniel Dulany believes that “ a tax imposed by Parliament, is a tax without their consent” (Dulany 133), because there is no colonial representation

America was born thanks to a tyrant. In fact, many of the laws that the King of England made were highly frowned upon by the colonists, and were resisted, as well as boycotted by many in the 1760s and 70s. After the French and Indian War, the British Parliament had passed a series of laws and taxes to the colonists. These very laws and taxes would bring conflict both sides. Two laws that resulted in the colonists to take action and request independence from England would be the Townshend Acts and the Intolerable Acts.

Once the Stamp Act gave the East India Company, “ the right to sell tea to the American colonies without paying taxes”, while Americans themselves were required too, the Bostonians decided they’d had enough. With their infamous rallying cry “No Taxation, without representation” patriots dressed as Indians threw the East Indian tea into the harbor, and forced both sides past the tipping point. Response to the Tea Party brought about, what would be the final straw for Anglo-Americans, creation and enforcement of the Intolerable Acts. Colonist saw these final acts as “proof the Britain would oppress them,” and inevitable set both countries on a path for war.

The British found the colonists unwilling to pay their fair share for the administration of the Empire. After all, citizens residing in England paid more in taxes than was asked of any American during the entire time of crisis. Between 1760 and 1776, British formulated some policies that would make the colonist pay their fair share for the administration of the Kingdom. Some of these policies were; the Sugar Act of 1764, the Stamp Act of 1765, the Townshend Act of 1767, the Tea Act of 1773, and the Intolerable Act. The main policies that triggered American rebellion and a movement towards independence were the Stamp Act of 1765, the Tea Act of 1773, and the Intolerable Act of 1774.

The British Parliament made a law to tax on sugar, molasses, tea and other goods. The American colonists didn’t like that they were being taxed; they thought that they should have their own rights, freedom and form their own government. To express their anger to the Mother Country a group of men dressed up as Native Americans and threw tea down the Boston Harbor. This took place on December 16 1773.

Furthermore, Great Britain had commanded new payment methods which created a ruckus with the Americans causeing great anger. Rebellion and discontent were rampant. The colonies started rebelling against ‘Mother England’ because of taxes issued to the colonies, in as much, England’s power did not allow them to have representation. The Revenue Act of 1764 made the Constitutional issue of whether or not the king had the right to tax the people who are living in his kingdom or the thirteen colonies. Eventually, this "became an entering wedge in the great dispute that was finally to wrest the American colonies from England" (Carey 48). "It was the phrase "taxation without representation" (Montgomery 138) that was to draw many to the cause of the American patriots against the mother country. That has royal authority to be able to term public opinions into a revolutionary battle.