Summary: Able To Look Over Social Media

The government should be allowed to see your social media accounts, but when they start to looking into your emails and daily messages, they need to stop. Some people that work in the government are hired to look at the normal life of people and to see if we are doing something that sends up a red flag. People have some very private emails and messages that they send out to family members or friends, and they do not want anyone else seeing those. Our privacy is invaded daily just because many people in this world cannot be trusted.

Greenwald does an exceptional job of diving into the meat and potatoes of the issue, and gets right at its core with an essential question we need to ask ourselves in our growing digital world: “Why does our privacy matter?” In his TED Talk: Why Privacy Matters Greenwald explains how the Internet, which has been hailed for the liberation it brought is now being used as a zone of mass discriminant surveillance (Greenwald, 2014). It seems as though whenever the topic is brought up most ignorant people immediately assume that if the government is watching, it is okay as long as you don’t have anything to hide. With this train of thought comes the idea that there are clear lines between “good” people and “bad” people in this world, and its essentially okay for a computer to determine whether or not someone is good or bad based on a collection of phone records, Google searches and associates on social media. The group of those saying that there is no harm done in the breaching of ones privacy are those who have accepted that they are in no way shape or form a threat to our government in any case. To me, that is something that is simply unacceptable in a functioning democracy. If people are so willing to give up every aspect of their daily lives to the government, it becomes easier to track the exact schedules and routines of certain individuals and on a grand scale, the impending results can be more than scary. Greenwald explains that there has been many studies held that prove that when humans know they are being watched, their behavior dramatically changes compared to if they think they are alone. After someone realizes they are being observed they quickly start conforming to their surroundings because they’ve become imprisoned in their own minds for fear of

Should the Government watch our emails and social media accounts?Would this help America become a safer and prevent terrorist attacks against the United State of America.Or will people rise against the Government watching them and not allowing it.So I will run you from some of the details about this question.So will Americans allow or not allow the Government to spy on them.

There is a lot that can be learned about a person by looking at their personal social media sites. Quite often they set their sites up so anyone can see their information. When they click, “public” on their settings, anyone can access their information. If a person chooses to set their site on public, then it is completely ethical for anyone, including the government, police, or even school to monitor their page. By setting it on public,

The Internet powers our country. Not only do hundreds of millions of Americans use it daily, our government and states use it to do important national and international business. Our government already utilizes it to monitor the activity of its people. This monitoring has especially risen after events such as the Boston Bombing and the attacks of 9/11. The main reason that the government does this is to keep us safe. If the government puts more slack on this matter, then it will give a chance for terrorists to complete their objective. The normal person does not know how many terrorist attacks may have been stopped in the past years due to this surveillance, and how many lives it may have saved. Therefore, we cannot let our government halt

People might not think about being watched when they’re posting personal experiences in their life on social media. The government has the ability and justification to go through a person’s social media site, listen to phone calls, and read text messages as a way of narrowing down possible suspects for terrorism. The privacy laws in America are what allows the U.S. government to search the digital world for possible threats to the country. Although some say that privacy laws help American citizens keep their confidentiality for medical reasons, also as benefits for social security, I still maintain that privacy laws gives the government undeserved power and can give the impression of being watched .

The media could be determined a tremendous and powerful weapon. If used properly, it can provide society with great benefits, but if used in negative ways, it can destroy. In a modern world where information can spread as fast as wildfires, a reason to monitor or limit types of media appear rational, but along with that, irrational cases still exist. This argument has circled in the United States for a while and a decision needs to be made. Parents and citizens around the United States think concerningly about what our eyes witness on the news, in stores, on billboards, etc. When the government determines what appears in the media, it not only belittles citizens, but it denies the First Amendment, which states the basic rights of an American. Censorship of the media, as displayed in 1984, clearly exhibits the violation of the First Amendment, rightfully given to the citizens of the United States, by the founding fathers of this country.

The children, teenagers, and adults of the world should not have to compromise their safety or their integrity in the world today. The lives of loved ones should never be risked because of social media. There are so many children who constantly feel like they have to be on their phone and liked on every website they are involved in. People need to be aware of their surroundings and need to not always be staring at the bright screen a few inches away from their face.

The government sees what you do on the internet, but what if, that’s not all. They have the access to see your day-to-day life. They can track you, they can see your posts, and they can see what you have done through the course of your life. When is all this taking their privilege too far? They are on the verge of violating freedom of speech. Expressing in any way, your beliefs and perspective, just can’t be done anymore. Many

Hi Vatche, Personally, I think our country is too paranoid. The news, and the internet have a way with words and images that make the citizens believe that everything is a threat. Sure, I am not happy that someone out there is collecting personal information about me—they are probably reading this right now. But regardless what we do, the NSA will continue to find a way and justify their actions—to record and collect our private conversations and internet searches.

It is important to realize the dangers of government surveillance; personal information containing sensitive details about an individual 's private life put in the wrong hands or otherwise used incorrectly could potentially have disastrous repercussions. In today 's interconnected world, everything that is said and done online is

Should every government--federal, State, and local--monitor the Internet activity, or should that task be left to the national government? That argument could go both ways, but personally, I believe that the federal government (namely the NSA) should watch and collect the data. One reason why this would be more beneficial is because the federal government is most likely more equipped to deal with likely terrorist threats. If the local or State governments monitored the Internet usage of the citizens and happened to find a threat, they would call in an agency from the federal government anyway. It would be much less time-consuming if those extra steps were eliminated completely and all Internet monitoring was left to the NSA. Additionally, if the NSA was left to monitor the Internet activity of all citizens, the agency would have to hire more people, leading to a decline in the unemployment

Some people believe that the intent of the government is actually to gain power over things that are intangible. It is true that the more power the government has, the less power the people have. However, government is centered around people giving up their personal freedoms in exchange for protection. An example of this is occurring in our government right now. There has been much controversy over President Trump_Ñés tweets, which consist of offensive words towards other countries such as North Korea and their leader. Many citizens are concerned that these tweets will put the safety of our country in jeopardy. This could be prevented if the government had to ability to check what the president puts on the internet before the world sees

"The extent that the government-federal, state and local have to monitor internet content would be a simple overview to make sure that everyone is alright and there is no alarming content that could be used to hurt others. Only an overview would be necessary to make sure that there are no obvious threats to anyone and if there are any suspected threats to anyone, there should always be a probable cause before any form of the government gets deeply involved into someones internet content because after all everyone should be entitled to privacy unless there is a specific reason that their privacy should be breached then the United States government should be allowed to view their content without restriction to keep people safe. The National Security Agency which is a national security agency that has intelligence over the country that is in the department of defense in the US and is directed by the Director of National

This paper will cover the pros and cons of government surveillance. It will cover different views on the issue such as ethical, social, and global impact. This paper will try to answer the question of how government surveillance on social media can impact local citizens in the United States