Summary: Analysis Of Student Writing

2. What writing strategy does the author use that you think is effective, and why? For example, does he use examples, or does he make

This literary analysis will go in depth to analyze how Brandon Wallace developed relationships with characters, how he uses symbolism, and where the story takes place. This literary analysis also takes a close look on how the theme is shown in the story and how the author uses it.

There are stories he incorporates to illustrate the point. In the middle we move to a more self-centered narrative. He tells of his story in New Jersey where he realized he could kill someone. He shares some of his thoughts of why people acted as they did towards him and others. This is an effective way he uses narrating and analyzing to work for the reader’s understanding.

The syntax that he uses may be more informal instead of formal academic language. He also uses good organizational structure to support his argument. He frequently initiates a new idea with a hook to get the readers attention or a transitionary phrases to segway into new ideas which makes the reading flow well. Then the idea is supported by either an anecdote from people or scholars that were interviewed or a statistic. This helps make his reasoning come across as persuasive and maybe bring resemblance to the readers own experiences that they can relate

My first point follows analyzes his tone, which allows for the effectiveness multiple writing techniques to help validate his intent. His tone is informal and very lax, allowing for the use of colloquial expressions in his work. These expressions allow the language of his work to take the form of a casual everyday conversation: this is what dictates the format of his work to his readers. The use of expressions makes his point much clearer, allowing readers to understand the authors meaning within the text. Notice also the shift in tone to a more aggressive to a more hands-off style. Schwartz says that “I am not here to judge…being civil” (16) and that “you must make that choice for yourself” (16). These quotes show his

If they would of learned how to read they would've known the rules and not broken them. He comes up with evidence to support his essay that he wrote. He make it more entertaining by having support in it and not just putting whatever he wants into it.

To start off he writes the first paragraph stating his claim and stating it clearly using the last part of the paragraph to say " and especially literature - actually diminished ". Catching his audiences eyes of the interest he then uses his second and third paragraph as his first part of his evidence and begins to explain why and what the surveys prove on. Surveys like The National Conference of state Legislation's, 2002 Public Participation in the Art mostly through out his paper. Paragraphs like 4 and 8 after giving his facts to the audience he goes and uses his own words putting his foot on the ground and

The works he selected for our syllabus have been engaging and challenging, covering topics from climate change to assisted suicide. In class, we deconstruct the pieces to construct our viewpoints. How does the author get you to feel invested in the characters? Why did they place this quote here, instead of at the piece’s beginning? How did they get access? Why is their view so sympathetic? Is it too sympathetic? What is this piece’s audience?

When reading his work, it is as though he is condensing his thoughts and feelings and observations in each word, like a deliberately presented stream of consciousness. He writes about what is real and relatable while providing a critique of what is culturally known and accepted.

This was the first and only writing that he completed and was truly excited to share with the class and myself. After reviewing his writing, I was astonished to find that he had a natural ability to write about a topic and hold the readers interest. His writing flowed as though he was having a conversation with his

After I read his article, I felt he was not attempting to engaging his abilities or points, but rather needing to create an impression. When we expound on something, we must have subject clearly. Then again, picking what to compose is a smidgen diverse undertaking. Their battles in their genuine effortlessly pondered their written work. Mary Shelley utilized this system while she was composing Frankenstein. In Mary Shelley's "enormous eve", I would believe that because of her condition or clashes like maternity, society, and sexuality, she got her motivation for her book at the night. These contentions produced an innovative thought and composed a book amid the dim and miserable night served to compose the endlessly acclaimed novel, Frankenstein.

Throughout these four pieces there is countless things that are evident and seem to be expected that we, as writers, know how to implicate. All of the writings had a story, something personal and meaningful to the writer that they thought was something they needed to share. They all were personal to some level, some more than others, and most of them taught a lesson. That being said, they all flowed smoothly from one topic to another, making it easy to read and enjoyable. They also had exquisite choices in words, they excluded weak verbs and had precise punctuation.

The author quotes different people in the content. By relying on secondary evidence the arguments he presents become valid and likely to persuade the audience towards a certain course of

When first reading through the piece, it is clear that the author of the summaries lacks any form of writing style. Each new sentence is a slab of information, completely devoid of any

Throughout the reading, I have captured that his style is simple and clear by bring out the main idea of each sentence for the most part. The structure is somehow poorly organized since there is not chapters or sub-topics making it slightly hard to read. The reading is repetitive, in which he brings up the same issues at times. Probably he wants the readers to focus deeply on those points. An example can be his views on the poor people and their current situations.