Summary: Effects Of Contaminants On The Environment

The Supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions. While in this particular matter, the statutes of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would generally trump the state level regulations of organizations such as the California Air Resources Board (CARB), however the EPA has also mandated that “The setting of these pollutant standards was coupled with directing the states to develop state implementation plans (SIPs), applicable to appropriate industrial sources in the state, in order to achieve these standards.” (EPA, 2015) The standards in questions are called National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

Water is probably the most important resource we as people have. Humans can survive without food for several weeks, but without water we would die in less than a week. On a slightly less dramatic note, millions of liters of water are needed every day worldwide for washing, irrigating crops, and cooling industrial processes, not to mention leisure industries such as swimming pools and water-sports centers. Despite our dependence on water, we use it as a dumping ground for all sorts of waste, and do very little to protect the water supplies we have.

This was the first declaration by federal government identifying that it was the rights of states and local governments to be responsible for controlling air pollution. The government took the health and public welfare of Americans seriously by passing the Air Pollution Act, but ironically, the federal government was not in any form engaging in air pollution clean up or prosecuting those responsible for pollution. This act did not reduce any of the smog in the atmosphere, nor did it make it easier for states with low funding to tackle their own city’s air pollution problems. The unseen long term benefits of this act were the federal research funds implemented to conduct air pollution research which eventually structured the Clean Air Act of

The Clean Air Act is a United States federal law designed to control air pollution on a national level.[1] It is one of the United States' first and most influential modern environmental laws, and one of the most comprehensive air quality laws in the world.[2][3] As with many other major U.S. federal environmental statutes, it is administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in coordination with state, local, and tribal governments.[4] Its implementing regulations are codified at 40 C.F.R. Subchapter C, Parts 50-97.

Improved air quality wasn’t a subject of national concern until the mid 1900s. After decades of coal burning, unregulated gas emissions from cars and the excessive burning of fossil fuels, people started noticing bad air quality as a hazard to their lives. Over several decades, after seeing the costly effects air pollution was having on the environment and people’s health, interest groups like the Friends of The Earth club and the influences of Theodore Roosevelt and Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring finally came together to persuade the government to enforce legislation that would reduce air pollution. Because of these efforts, the policies of the Clean Air Act of 1963 and the Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Act of 1965, that aimed to control air pollution and raise air quality standards, helped create the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on December 2, 1970. Since then, the EPA has passed more air quality improvement acts, and amendments to previous acts passed, to increase restrictions on air pollutants, with their main policy concern being the Clean Air Act. Improved air quality acts imposed by the EPA have been successful in cleaning the United States’ air quality by reducing ground-level ozone pollution and reducing emissions, allowing for a decrease in pollution related deaths/illnesses and a better standard of living. The EPA, through regulations and the Clean Air Act, has delivered it’s promise to improve air quality in the United States.

Before 1955, many air issues were managed by the states. Upon witnessing “the London Fog Disaster of 1952 [resulting] in over 3,000 deaths in the United Kingdom…and the Donora Smog Incident of October 1948 [resulting] in twenty deaths in Pennsylvania” (Ahlers) the United States realized the need for air quality control. The Clean Air Act of 1963 was the first legislation in the United States to control air pollution (Clean Air Act). In 1970, the Clean Air Act was amended, and decreased many of its previous flaws. The new amendment created: National Ambient Air Quality Standards, New Source Performance Standards, specified controlling off of auto emissions, and encouraged states to develop plans to standards set by the EPA (Clean Air Act Text).

the established air quality standards to create a permit program regulating new or modified major

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 impose certain requirements on States that have not achieved the national air quality standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency in earlier legislation. The Amendments required the “nonattainment” states to establish a permit

Facts: In 1977 Congress revised the Clean Air Act (CAA) to address states that failed to attain air quality standards previously established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)1. This amendment to the CAA required states that were not in compliance with the established air quality standards to create a permit program regulating new or modified major stationary sources of air pollution1. The EPA defined a major stationary source as any device in a manufacturing plant that produced pollution1. This definition was later refined to allow an existing plant to use new equipment that did not meet the established standards so long as total emissions from the plant did not increase.

The American Auto Industry, in the form of vehicles it produces, account for almost one-fifth of emissions in the United States. Subtracting emissions created from production,

According to Clean Air Act Amend of 1977, there are various requirements set on States that were yet to maintain the national air quality standards that were established by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The requirements were in line with the earlier legislation among the requirements of “nonattainment States” to establish permit program that was regulating the new and modified major source of air pollution. However, the permit was not to be issues for such sources unless stringent rules were set (Chevron USA Inc V. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc, et el, 1984).

Up until lately, air pollution has been accomplished solely in the controlling atmosphere. Consequently, the matter offers us an outstanding illustration of how strategies creation has worked in the past years; federal determinations have helped states recognize the sources of air pollution and the influences of those discharges (Dale, 2015, chap.3 sum). The Clean Air Act remains to progress to replicate new discipline and deliver technology-based values for guidelines. Current struggles to increase the management to contain market-based, tradable documents also give us a respected intimation about the route for control. The global field has so far delivered insignificant but vital provision for state, government, and resident labors to administer

The Clean Air Act (CAA), enacted in 1970 to regulate air emissions, provided the first standardized rules, which classify, monitor, and decrease air contaminates across the United States. The act authorized the development of comprehensive federal and state regulations to limit emissions from industrial and mobile sources. The CAA included four regulatory programs that affected stationary or industrial sources. One of the programs, The National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), stated that the newly formed EPA was required to declare national standards for six criteria pollutants; carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, hydrocarbons and photochemical oxidants. The other three programs helped State officials

In today’s society chemicals, whether you like it or not are a fact of life. Many people are afraid of chemicals and their effects on them and the environment. This is understandable because the truth of the matter is that chemicals can do some horrible things to humans, animals and the whole ecosystem. Some would say that chemicals should be done away with for these reasons. But this certainly is not true and most likely impossible. Chemicals can also have some very positive effects on our lives. Some uneducated people would argue that there should not be restrictions on chemicals. This is just as crazy as saying that chemicals should be done away with. If chemicals are regulated and people abide

EPA proposed a perfect air get ready for the State of Texas to meet the Regional Haze BART and Interstate Visibility Transport necessities of the Clean Air Act and set January 10, 2017, as the date for an open hearing. In Houston petrochemical offices disregarded clean air laws no less than 405 times in 2015, wrongfully discharging 5 million pounds of contamination, including chemicals connected to asthma and malignancy., Environment Texas is confronting the polluters and requesting they take after the law and quit dirtying our air. Texas has begun to get serious about guilty parties with the TCEQ and EPA clean air act. Be that as it may, regardless we have far to go. Texas must remain standing for clean air and rebuff the ones that disregard the issue.