Summary: Medical Testimony Or Physical Evidence

HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION_______________________ Patient Name: Chapman Robert Kinsey Patient ID: 110589 Room No.: 322-B Date of Admission: 23 February ---Admitting Physician: Martha C. Eaton, MD, Geriatrics Chief Complaint: Admitted from Dr. Max Hirsch’s office due to deep ulcer on left toe. Admitting Diagnoses 1. Severe peripheral vascular disease, status post deep ulcer on left toe. Rule out thrombolysis. The patient was admitted to a regular floor. Condition is serious. 2. ALLERGY TO PENICILLIN, which puts patient into anaphylactic shock. 3. Continue with home medications. DETAILS OF PRESENT ILLNESS: Mr. Kinsey is an 87-year-old white gentleman with history of (1) Chronic atrial fibrillation, on Coumadin. (2) Chronic deafness,

accounts of sexual abuse,But all the evidence of the case is pointing otherwise. Such as the

REPORTER: The reporter (Gennette) called with concerns for the victims, Leslie, Tapenga, and Teagan. According to the reporter, there was a police report in Leslie’s file from Wisconsin. When Justin Tegelman (Leslie’s brother/special needs/currently 19 years old) was 16 years old, he had six counts of sexual assault (from December 2011-June 2012), while living in Wisconsin. The incidents occurred when Justin was a minor. In the police report, Chad (Justin’s father) caught him doing something to one of his sisters (Tapenga). Chad caught them under the covers, and it didn’t appear that their pants were down. Justin said they (Tapenga) were humping. The reporter said, Chad clapped his hands together to indicate humping and Tapenga said “that’s not what happened”. Justin described it as

Due to doubts surrounding the forensic evidence in this case it may have led the jurors to have reasonable doubt regarding returning a guilty verdict ("Forensic Analysis of the Casey Anthony Trial - Crime Museum", 2017). The jurors finally found Casey Anthony guilty of aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child ("Forensic Analysis of the Casey Anthony Trial - Crime Museum",

This leads to the analysis of the State Attorney’s Office’s decision stating that Winston would not be charged with rape due to lack of evidence. Mueller and Kirkpatrick define real evidence as “tangible things directly involved in the transactions or events in litigation” (25) in Evidence Law and the System. In the case between Winston and Kinsman, an example of real evidence would be the clothes Kinsman was wearing the night of the rape. She was wearing pink jeans and underwear underneath and Winston’s DNA was found in both of these articles of clothing. This finding proves they had some sexual interaction, but it doesn’t prove that the sex was non-consensual. Demonstrative evidence is defined as “tangible proof that in some way makes graphic the point to be proved” (27). In this case an example of demonstrative evidence could be depictions of the bruises, lacerations and other minor injuries and body markings that were recorded at her initial visit to the hospital following the rape. Having this graphic could reveal to jurors the severity of the attack and the aggression that was used against

Christmas Day 1996, the body of young JonBenet Ramsey is found strangled and raped in her basement. The family of the girl has no idea what happened and they are distraught. Ten years pass before police find circumstantial evidence that a 41 year old school teacher named John Mark Karr could be involved in the murder. The police traced his internet activity and found emails about the murder to a professor at the University of Colorado. They also found child pornography on his computer. The police held him on the charge of child pronography when they began questioning him about Ramsey’s murder. Karr admitted to the murder of the child. There was no physical evidence linking the man to the murder and he provided only facts and elements of

Reporter stated the following: I did a forensic interview with him (Jeffery) on today. He did not say when these incidents happened. He witnessed 15 year old boy (Corey) make a 16 year old girl (Arrianna Unknown) "touch down there and put her head down there with her mouth". This morning he witnessed Lane touch Amaria on her breasts on the top of her clothes. He said the staff knows about both incident but he did not say where they were. Ms. Anthony knows about it too. They call Ms. Anthony Ms. A. He said all of the kids get in fights. He said staff will try to break up the fights. He said his throat is still hurting because he was hit by an unknown child.

How can one prove that his body and mind were not on the same page. He was tied to the bed and unable to fight and his body responded which does not mean consent but still the jury issued not guilty. Once body reaction does not always reflect on the mind. Another one would be the produsor and how can one argue with a written cosent paper and a tape of the victim taking her close off for the cameras. Even when she had changed her mind about going through with it there is no way to prove that it was rape because the defendent showed that she knew what she was doing and signed. The last case, they had to prove that the victim was actually the prey and had winesses that testified that she was touching hima all night and taking to his girfrilend about his infedality. Went all the way to showing the cevelance video of the hallway where they did the act that showed that she consented and even incuroged for the act to take place. One in ever six american is sexually assulted and not all of them get the justice they seeked for because of the conent

In Brenda Waudby’s case, her 21 month old daughter was left care of a baby sitter aged 14. That night her daughter died in the hospital a pubic hair was found in her groin area, however that pubic hair was later lost. In 1997 following the autopsy Dr. Smith concluded that the child suffered abdominal trauma whilst in the care of her mother. The crown withdrew the case concluding that the injuries occurred when the child was not under Mrs. Waudby’s care. Five years following, the pubic hair that had disappeared was found in Dr. Smith’s office by authorities. Dr. Smith had previously testified that he knew nothing about the pubic hair. In 2006 the baby sitter who watched the daughter pleaded guilty for manslaughter. “J.D. admitted to beating and sexually assaulting Jenna and pleaded guilty to manslaughter in December 2006. The court sentenced him to 22 months in prison.”² Unfortunately though, no charges of sexual assault were laid due to lack of evidence.

Musculoskeletal- erosive destructive changes in the elbows, wrist, and hands consistent with rheumatoid arthritis, has bilateral total knee replacements with stovepipe legs and perimalleolar pitting edema 1+. I feel no pluses distally in either leg.

A teenager from Texas allegedly found that his teacher had been sexually abusing him. The teen claimed to have access to the instructor’s phone and found images of himself asleep.

A defense medical examination is a physical exam conducted by a doctor of the defendant’s insurance company on the plaintiff. It is vital that before going through this process, the client listens to the advice of their lawyer. If I was the paralegal this is the advice I would give them. The first piece of advice I would give my client would be to remember why you’re there. The defendant’s insurance company hired this doctor to examine the client. If the examination does not go well, the doctor will be testifying against the plaintiff. The client should be polite and cooperative with the process. The client should also be aware that at all times during the examination, they are being judged. The client also needs to keep in mind that they

“Victims of Child Pornography Have to Return to State Courts to Seek Restitution.” In the case Paroline vs. the United States, which took place in 2014, it was affirmed that a child whose sexual abuse appeared in pornography was entitled to financial compensation under the federal Crime Victims Restitution Act for direct, foreseeable, significant, and repeated harm from the viewing of child pornography images. (Karmen, 2016) Paroline vs. the United States case is in reference to Doyle R. Paroline who plead guilty to possession of 300 images that were considered child pornography. (572 U. S., 2014) In 1997, a girl named Amy was sexually abused by her uncle, Eugene Zebroski when she was eight-years-old. (Paulose, 2014) Consequently, during the sexual abuse of Amy by Eugene Zebroski, he took photographs of his criminal acts and posted the pictures on the Internet.

The first step in the investigation would be to attempt to determine the validity of the child pornography claim. In an attempt to determine what the child saw, the investigator would need to speak to the child directly, instead of basing any decisions on what the mother told him. Due to an ongoing custody battle between the parents, this could be a ploy by the mother to get the upper hand in the battle. Upon questioning the five-year-old, it would need to be determined whether these photos were child pornography or could they simply be innocent pictures of their son taken by one of the parents while the other parent was bathing or changing him. If the child tells the investigator the pictures he saw where indeed of other children, without

The call centre of the Eastern Medical Faculty Foundation, hereafter referred to as EMFF, provides a competitive advantage to the Internal Medicine Department of the Chicago School of Medicine through the delivery of efficient and high quality service to patients. Treating patients generates revenue the Internal Medicine Department and contributes to investments in research in the highly competitive healthcare sector. Unfortunately, declining customer satisfaction, as evidenced in a growing number of customer complaints, suggests the quality of service is deteriorating and threatens the very competitive advantage of the EMFF.