Summary Of Being Wrong By Schulz

They feel as if they are all, “real cool”. However, as the poem continues, the repeated "We" is seen not at the beginning, but at the end of each line. This simultaneously displays a certain aspect that was not seen in the first line. It shows certain confusions and distinct uncertainties about the group’s identity, or even as an example of protesting too much, whether there's a group identity at all. Who is “We” that they are so insistent about? Repeated as it is, the “We” gets smaller and smaller. She is saying that in life it may seem like “we”, but it all comes to a point where the “we” gradually starts representing one individual, rather than a whole group. The poet has in fact said that the "we" is supposed to be read in a small and uncertain way, thus the reason for the unpunctuated "we" at the end of each line after the initial “We” in the beginning of the poem. That word kind of becomes a question, as well as a refrain. The unity that was seen in the beginning becomes less and less apparent as the poem continues.

As a result, the protagonist feels she cannot fit in and builds hesitancy and self-doubt. Helga “could neither conform, nor be happy in her unconformity” (7). Helga concludes that she cannot accept the stereotypes put forth by society, neither can she accept her own identity and individuality with content.

He uses the term “we” to refer to all people, so that his comparison becomes universal. The metaphor reintroduces the idea that in the end all people are the same. In the desert, without water, money, or a place to sleep, we are all stripped of what would otherwise define us in society, and instead we are all equal. Any and all divisions are abandoned when survival is on the line. This ties to the meaning because in these situations, we must band together to figure out how to survive and make the best out of the situation.

Abigail Adams is making a plea for equality for women and for herself. This can be seen when she uses the points of view you, I, your, ours and us at different points in her letter. “That your Sex are Naturally Tyrannical is a Truth so thoroughly established as to admit no dispute, but such as you wish to be happy willing to give up the harsh title of Master for the more endearing one of Friend (24).” Abigail uses I and you because she is referencing their own relationship and the equality she wants in their marriage. She does this to show how it affects them personally.

The narrator’s use of the first person is use to create an idea of a bond between the friends, and he uses the term “we” throughout the story to point out that the group was together through it all. In the beginning of the story the narrator tells is that the gang of friends had went two nights without doing anything interesting. Then, the third night “Whatever it was we were looking for, we weren’t going to find it at greasy lake. Not that night.” (295). This short quote shows me that the narrator was trying to tell us that everything that was about to happen from that point on was a group decision. Also, to further elaborate, I found the repetition of the word “we” to be a point of emphasis to try to negate some of the future consequences of his actions to his friends despite

The ways in which the society forces its citizens to refer to themselves as “we” and their similar natured names cause the individuals to view themselves as a group. The first official introduction to the main character is in chapter one when he says, “Our name is Equality 7-2521…”( Rand 18). From the beginning, when Equality says, “Our,” while referring to himself, it is clear that the citizens of the society cannot refer themselves as ‘I’. Excluding personal pronouns, engraves in the people’s minds that they are not individuals. In addition, if citizens were to refer to themselves as ‘I’ they would regard and value themselves as individual people opposed to living for others. As a result, this would defy the basis of collectivist principles. Throughout the story, various characters names are words pertaining to synonyms of brotherhood and togetherness. For instance, while Equality is standing in the great hall watching his brothers while they

To the ignorant and self-oblivious person, the true individuality of a man’s self is presumed through his ability to possess an apt and socially preferable state of mind. Quite ironic in fact—and if I’m not mistaken—the widespread consensus regarding human identity, is that it is at its most ripe, and fertile upon one’s inevitable decision to conform to the mass. Such logic is somewhat of a paradox-in-itself and if we deconstruct the meaning of the terms ‘conform’ and ‘individuality’ their contrast is vast, and their apparent use is irrational, therefore all aspects of the human mind remain complacent, and mundane to a certain degree that it erases any former beliefs of a unique human being. Rather, human personality is an

The novella, Anthem by Ayn Rand, Is written in the first person point of view. Although the reader may be tricked due to the fact that the author commonly uses words such as, we, were, and our. In the first chapter of the novel, Equality 7-2521, the main character, says “Our name is Equality 7-2521, as it is written on the iron bracelet which all men wear on their left wrists with their names upon it” (6). Equality 7-2521 is not talking about a group of people when he says “our name”, he is only talking about himself. Yet, the society which he lives in (a post, Dark Age version of the world) does not allow him to use the word “I” along with the word “ego”, unless he wants to be punished by death. This becomes clearer to the reader at the end

Her use of “we” at the start here calms the other organizations by implying that no one means any harm to these organizations, and that these reformers will take their full responsibility. Cary speaks on the behalf of the reformers and defends them. The use of anaphora by starting with “we” makes the sentences seem more

Another way Rand portrays collectivism in the novel Anthem, is with the word “I” essentially being nonexistent and everything being “We”. Throughout the entire book anytime Equality 7-2521 is referring to himself he states “We”, because that is what he is taught from a young age as correct. Rand writes, “We are one in all and all in one. There are no men but only the great WE, One,

“I am done with the monster of “We,” the word of serfdom, of plunder, of misery, falsehood, and shame.” (Page 97). In relation to the novel Prometheus is reaching an enlightenment of his own beliefs. He realizes very early in the novella that he is very different from his brothers surrounding him. Prometheus states that he is no longer using the word “We” because it is a word of Collectivism rather than a word of Objectivism. The quote closely relates to the overall theme of Individualism by him saying that he no longer wishes to use the word we. Prometheus closely supports and strengthens the Individuality he has within

In WE, Zamyatin creates a society known as One State that revolves not around the individual, but around the collective we, with the Benefactor in God-like status at the center. The Benefactor possesses qualities that the

We decide how our peers come to a conclusion about us. For example, why do people I am

Both “We” and “A Man” consider man’s propensity for greatness, ability to wield words wisely, and the notion that we can be the change we wish to see in this world. A symbol is a thing; moreover, this thing carries a deeper level of meaning. In “We,” the speaker

Within Bernhard Schlink’s The Reader, the characters Michael Berg and Hanna Schmidt possess individual and collective pasts which are impossible to escape and ultimately influence the paths of their lives throughout the novel. Schlink conveys this idea through the combined use of structure, setting, characterization, narrative perspective, and references to memory, dreams and symbolism.