Summary Of Color Blindness

This chapter on the framework of the colorblind ideology seems to be the most concrete and logical chapter in the book. This chapter is very well put together, with examples that cover a wide variety of topics. He also illustrates the concept of the frameworks playing into one another very well. The premise of these four frameworks as an “impregnable yet elastic wall that barricades whites from the United States’ racial reality” makes perfect logical sense as an explanation for the “racism without racists” culture seen in the US (47). Changing attitudes towards race relations forced a change in the manifestation of racist ideologies.

The United States has many minority groups that face oppression. In the media today, most of the minority issues that are highlighted involve the LGBTQ community, women, and racial minorities. Differently-abled people are rarely given the space to share with the world how they see it. This literature review will discuss terms related to visual impairment, legislative measures taken in the United States to assist those with severe visual impairments, and the oppression and discrimination those who are visually impaired face.

Colorblindness is a defect in the perception of colors, caused by a deficiency in specialized cells in the retina that are sensitive to different colors. The term is often used today during political discourse, often by members of some factions of liberalism, when claiming that one’s race should be irrelevant to any decision making process. It is a form of moral posturing; that one should see an individual as simply an individual, but not as part of any larger group or culture. As if this philosophy will enable us to bridge any gaps between races, this thought attempts to focus on how we are all the same, rather than how we differ. Teachers and administrators are required to complete coursework pertaining to multicultural education

Color-blindness, meaning no more preferences, had a wide range of views from these authors. Connerly, author of “What Happened to Post-Racial America?”, is for this idea of color-blindness. Connerly mentions, near the end of his article, “he [president Obama] should urge Americans to embrace the color blind vision of John F Kennedy who said that ‘race has no place in American life or law”. He states “The longer we allow preferences to endure in the guise of diversity, the more damage will be done to the nation” on page 180, showing his disbelief in that the continuous judgement based on race will have a positive outcome. By stating “Blacks are on our courts, including the highest court in the land, blacks are mayors of major cities and heads of American corporations”, we can see that Connerly feels that since there are already blacks in higher positions similar to those whites are in, we no longer need to pay attention to color.

I agree that color-blindness perpetuates, produces, and subverts ideas of race that shape the relationships between race and place at the local level because it undermines and justifies racial segregation. As stated by Reynolds, “It is a very practical problem that is creating increasingly serious problems for most American cities – problems like racial tension, slums and difficulties for urban renewal” (Los Angeles Sentinel, Sept 22, 1960). As stated, that housing was one of the major civil rights issues it is because the notion of whiteness and property perpetuates

As both the documentary and the article convey, the modern concept of being blind to race is not a logical perspective when opposing racial discrimination. In White People, the idea of racial “colorblindness” was described as “not seeing race,” and subsequently being of the opinion that would be “society would be better off if we never acknowledged race” (White People). In the article “What Is Race?” the colorblind stance “appears, on the surface, to be neither positive nor negative” (Moya & Markus 170). However, both media ultimately refer to racial colorblindness as dismissive of modern racism. As a result of the presented facts from both media, I believe that colorblindness

Patricia Williams testimony demonstrates the negative impact the color blind ideology can have on others, in this case her son. The “color makes no difference” statement that the teachers were declaring formed a resistance in her son when identifying colors. This ideology shapes how people understand different races consequently letting racial matters be ignored and avoided. This ideology is indeed problematic is it impacts the way people respond to situations and events. Race must be taken into account in order to address issues of race. Without it, there will be a misunderstanding of, racial hostility, discrimination and other issues. Without it, they will continue to go consciously unnoticed and unsolved.

Looking back to the previous answers, I relate to these key details. First, because I was part of the predominant racial group, race didn’t need to be discussed. There was some color-blindness in the way we viewed race. Second, I can see there is a difference between “Hispanics” and “blacks” in Colombia, nevertheless this difference has not been as strong as it has been in the United States. Still, it is sad to see that there are more differences between Colombians due to corruption and internal armed conflicts. Power has corrupted our society making us enemies among each other. Unfortunately, it is no longer “whites” against “blacks;” for the last 50 years in Colombia it has been “Colombian” against “Colombian.” Skin tone is not an issue,

Once the civil rights movement surfaced, the idea of racial color-blindness surfaced to dictate society’s mindset. Self-proclaimed advocates for equality incorporate an ethic of color-blindness, while ignoring ancestral variances inherent among groups of people. Color-blindness attempts to equalize all races, but that process erases the historical and cultural context of different races to integrate them into the ideology of whiteness. Due to the cultural and historical differences, not all individuals accept this societal paradigm and thus they are marginalized. The problem remains fixed in the white body that organizes

The article about the children and how they see race and response to the idead of race was festinating. One the outside the other children seen one color, but the children on the inside seen another color. Joseph, black

I enjoyed the personal stance that the author has in writing about his deficiency and relates it to society. His personal account and experience gives the article more sustenance and validity. There was someone I knew in grade school who had a color deficiency and it truly fascinated me. To better understand how he perceived the world, I compared the colors with him. He had difficulty distinguishing between red and green, and from this article, I know now this is called anomalous trichromacy. The prevalence of color blindness is not something I

As the authors talks about the social inequalities in society, they often based their interpretation of the issue with evidence supported by research done by other people. However, the authors should have also included interviews of people with first hand experience as evidence for their arguments to allow the reader to have a deeper perspective of the issue. For example, in regards to colorblindness, the authors states “colorblindness is not actually possible; we do in fact see race and it does have social meaning consequence” (pg. 172). Currently, colorblindness isn’t possible, but ideas of it has been brought in books such as The Giver by Lois Lowry. In this book, society is constructed so

I enjoyed your forum post this week, it was very informative. I find color blindness to be an odd but interesting visual phenomenon. I had a good friend that I served with in the military and he was color blind. We could always tell when he was in trouble with his wife, because he would be wearing the wrong color undershirt. Two of the main colors that he was unable to distinguish were green and brown, I believe that would mean that he suffered from Protanopia color blindness. You selected great potentially dangerous situations. As I was reading your examples, I thought of a similar situation. Along with not being able to distinguish the color of traffic lights, I believe that some traffic signs would be hard to decipher as well.

Eye color comes from the amount of melanin, a pigment found in the front part of the iris of the eye (Genetics, 2017). Lack of melanin results in blue eyes, some melanin gives green eyes, and a lot of melanin gives brown eyes. Cataracts are clouding of the lens that prevents light from entering. The cause of cataracts is unknown but there are possible reasons for it such as diabetes, smoking, and a lot of exposure to sunlight. Signs include lack of color intensity, night vision problems, fuzzy, blurry, or filmy vision. The function of the retina is to receive light the lens had focused on, switch the light into neural signals, and then send those signals to the brain for visual recognition. Most of the time eye floaters are from age related

Have you ever had color distinguishing primary colors? Because if you have this may be a eye disease. Color blindness. This is a vision problem in which you have trouble distinguishing specific colors such as red, green, blue and yellow. Color blindness is a condition normally your born with, but it can be gained throughout life. It is literally when your unable to detect all of the primary colors to sum it all up. It is not in fact a form of blindness, but a deficiency in ways you perceive color. It is a condition that is inherited. Its said that it affects males more than it affects women. There is an estimate by the association prevent blindness america that 8 percent of males and less than 1 percent of women have color distinguishing problems. It is mostly seen within men from northern European descent. Rare cases show that someone can inherit a trait that reduces the ability to see blue and yellow pigments.