Summary Of 'Do Dogs Ever Simply Want To End The Pain?'

The “father of psychoanalysis”, Sigmund Freud, was next to reveal the amazing discovery during the early 1930s throughout psychotherapy sessions. Although his view on the therapeutic benefits of human-animal interactions were not recognized for over two decades after the time of his death in 1939-- he is also a component to the beginning of animal-assisted therapy in mental health treatments. Freud believed that his dog—Jofi-- could “sense” tension from the patients and used distance as a method of signaling the occurrence. The farther away that Jofi would stand from the patient indicated the amount of tension that he felt from them and vice versa.

So, now you have an arsenal of the most important tools to keep your dog from becoming aggressive and attacking other people and other dogs. Getting attacked by a dog is a really scary event because their bites can cause serious injuries or death. It is important to always protect yourself by carrying a dog repellent spray on your keychain for when an unexpected event happens.

Moreover, Suzuki made an effective discussion by talking about animal’s life after being tested if they survive. He made readers to think and feel about the pain of animals by his emotional questions, “What gives us the right to exploit other living organisms as we see fit? How do we know that these other creatures don't feel pain or anguish just as we do? Perhaps there's no problem with fruit flies, but where do we draw the line?” (Suzuki, 1989, p.681). Suzuki’s main purpose is to convince the audience that animals feel pain and it is unethical to make animals suffer from pain for our benefits. Suzuki suggests that it is not wise to use animals for research as well as for our pleasure to the extent that results in extinction.

Mountain Vista’s High school class of 2017 was able to create and elective named Dog Therapy. Which would make Mountain Vista the only high school in the Douglas County schooling area to have a dog therapy “class”. But you won’t know until you are enrolled in the class is that you will have to go through many hours of training. To only reach a .25 credit and no letter grade on your transcript. Which is a huge misfortune, because you will put just as much work in this class as you would in any other class if not more. So with the guidance of my consoler and I, we decided to propose this to the Dougal county board and to the assistant principal. With the rest of the second semester I created a Dog Therapy class proposal, and got the green light from the

many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we have ever imagined. They feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love…” (1). This statement can also be proven through science. Just like humans, animals also have “the same types of nociceptors… A-delta and C fibers...” (Victoria Braithwaite 1). These nociceptors are used to detect pain. If animals display many of the same qualities as humans and feel pain, they should be treated more humanely.

The domestic dog has to be one of the most unique animals that the human had ever bred. All dogs were formed differently and for separate reasons; whether it be for their looks or for their personal attributes, the dog has been evolved around humans and yet many breeds were created by humans themselves. I also believe that having a dog is a necessity to having a balanced life, just how Cesar Millan was quoted on the Brainy Quote web page “The dog can only become what's in your bubble. The dog is imitating the energy that is in your bubble. You are the source, the feast of energy. If you feel anxious, the dog becomes anxious with you. If you become nervous, the dog wakes up nervous with you”. Your dog runs off of your actions and emotions

Jeremy Rifkin had made such impact on readers through his article “A Change of Heart about Animals”. Not only did he inform us the reality that animals do have feelings, he also unbounded the label we had long given to the animals, thus fully altered our perspectives about these fellow creatures. In regard to the influence, I myself am not excluded. As a matter of fact, since I was a kid, I have started raising pets. As long as it seems, I have built myself an assumption about these domestic animals as they don’t differ much from humans’ natural behavior in life. They have feelings, family and awareness of surroundings.

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, on free will and comfort, offers the dogs to serve as a companion to the PTSD victims. The department allows the dogs to serve the purpose of the grooming and training. According to Shubert (2012), the dogs initially did not receive any special training, and there existed no program concerning the dogs care. People used dogs as a source of fun helping individuals to reduce stress.

Animals can show emotion just like humans do. The Purdue University studied on pigs and “found that they crave affection and are easily depressed if isolated or denied playtime with each other. The lack of mental and physical stimuli can result in deterioration of health.” (Rifkin 4) This quote shows that the pigs have their emotions and they can have bad health problems, and that’s something that we humans have to.

With that being said, animals’ feelings and how they are treated are just as important as how we’re treated and changing this will benefit the society as a whole. I have fortunately had a few animals come and go in my life and I have become a big animal lover myself, just like Rifkin. When I am down, my animal would comfort me, and when I was happy and excited, my animal would play around with me. With that being said, animals have feelings and emotions too, and we should treat them as such. He included in his article many things that people wouldn't even think to consider such as finding a study done on pigs’ behavior in different situations.

The last point I would like to make is that the animals are subjected to a long and painful death or inhuman suffering. Some would argue that it is just an animal and they don't feel pain the way humans do. Even if animals can't tell us that they are in pain, we can tell that they are by observing their behavior. The suffering may not only effect the animal being killed, they may also have babies who are now trying to survive without a mother or father.

He states that if animals have the ability to suffer, then they must have “interests” (Singer 3). However, how can we tell if an animal is suffering? We as humans assume that animals must be suffering because we have empathy. Empathy allows us to understand the feelings of others. Therefore, when we see and hear about animal testing and on how they are treated before they are killed for food, we assume that they are suffering.

Jeremy Bentham states “The question is not, can they reason? nor, can they talk? but can they suffer?” Vicki Hearne, animal trainer and author of What’s Wrong with Animal Rights, and Peter Singer, author of The Animal Liberation Movement, relate humans to other living beings. Although, both Hearne and Singer share some similarities towards animal rights their perspective towards animal suffering differ in definitions and qualities of suffering. Hearne and Singer link animal suffering to human connection with other living beings.

In fact, whether an animal can suffer or not has been a repetitious question since the factory farming industry has initiated and evolved. In the book Animal Liberation, written by Peter Singer, he asks the same question to the reader: “The question is not ‘Can they reason?’ nor ‘Can they talk?’ but ‘Can they suffer?” There is no right or wrong answer to this question, but there is capacity to understand where one might agree with Singer and his thought that animals can suffer. Prejudice is morally unacceptable, whether it is based on

One view that is taken upon animals is that they cannot feel anything, so therefore, it does not hurt the animal but more the owner—in the view of pets. (E, p. 533) He explains that the owner of the pet feels more pain about the injured pet then that of the animals injury, and continues to explain that this viewpoint is irrelevant because pain is where it is felt, physiologically. The only reason that the belief is held is because the owner of the pet has a moral obligation to ensure the pets safety, and that the owner can actually do something about it—this is the subconscious view of the owner. He then tries to give some points on how animals should be treated. He argues that there is this “cruelty-kindness view” in that he states “…we have a direct duty to be kind to animals and a direct duty not to be cruel to them.” (E, p. 536) This view seems to have a valid argument but his argument begins to fail as he blurs the lines of human and animal interests during his argument to support this. However, Peter Singer has some level of agreement but takes a different stance.