Summary Of For Environmental Balance Pick Up A Rifle

In my opinion, Mr. Kristof’s tone is inappropriate for this issue. Although I do agree with the author, in my opinion taking a serious tone would go further in conveying his view. Many individuals take this topic close to heart and would not appreciate the light hatred jokes. I personally already believed that hunting animals to balance out the ecosystem and should be a modern practice. Some specific statements in the article did stick out at me; one example of the statements was when Kristof stated that the human killed the predator but did not take over the role of hunter. One implicit assumption Kristof makes in this article is when he sais it is estimated that one hundred fifty people a year in car crashes. I agree with Kristof if

Honestly, there are pros and cons to Kristof’s theory that hunting is the best way to reduce the deer population. There are multiple pros about hunting. Some pros are that it is a great way for humans to connect with nature, for some it is to carry on family traditions, and is an easy way to control the deer population. However, the cons outweigh the pros. A few that stand out are animal suffering, individuals who overhunt, and the deathly hunting accidents that have occurred. Kristof states there are 150 deadly car accidents caused by deer, but I found that, “In 2007, there were 122 unintentional firearm deaths in children, and an additional 3,060 nonfatal gun and shooting accidents” (Iannelli). This statistic does not even include adults. These deadly hunting accidents are about equal to the amount of deadly car accidents caused by deer. Kristof basically says hunting will decrease the deer population, which should decrease car accidents, but hunting is causing just as many fatal accidents. The cycle for causing deaths never ends; our world is a dangerous place, making it hard to solve issues like this. All in all, hunting can help decrease the overpopulated deer, but I do not agree that it is the safest and best or only solution out

How does this effectively relay Pathos? If you did not know the resilience animals are capable of well now the audience does. To share disheartening facts of what is really happening in commercial agriculture it helps to understand a little of the back bone of the operations and to understand the difference that goes into producing food that isn’t tainted with toxins and poison. To reach people that don’t quite “get it” requires very basic stories to help them connect the dots and see what could be alternatives to modern consumerism. If people can’t relate to something they never change they continue with the same old. At the very least, this article provided thought and left people with options on how they choose to sustain their families.

Hunting is an extremely controversial topic in the U.S. Since the beginning of history, man has hunted animals for food to live and to utilize other parts for clothing and other essential reasons. There are many people who are strongly opposed to hunting and think that it should be banned. There are also many people that support hunting and think that it is an acceptable thing to do. One such writer, Rick Bass, describes a similar emotion in his essay, “Why I hunt”. In the essay, he emphasizes his deep love for hunting and claims that it is an enjoyable activity. He employs such details to his story describing his surrounding beautifully that towards the end of the article, his attempts to appeal to reader’s imagination strengthen his

In America, deer are an animal hunted widely throughout our country. Each winter citizens have mixed emotions about the sport. Some say its barbaric and cruel, while others argue that it’s beneficial and useful. Although people may say hunting is cruel and barbaric, have they ever thought about the upsides to be gained from hunting? While this is a topic that can be argued viciously back and forth, I believe hunters win the argument. Deer hunting keeps the population down, protects farmers’ crops, boosts economic sales, betters a person’s mental health, and teaches lifelong lessons on respect. These are just a few of the amazing benefits that can be gained from hunting.

Predators, hunters, and habitat contribute to the increasing densities of whitetail deer in some locations. The populations of predators, wolves and cougars, have greatly declined in suburban areas. This declination has helped with the increase of the deer population. Since the 1970’s the number of hunters has been declining. This may be because of the number of people that do not believe in recreational, or sport hunting. For some hunting has become a hobby to show off and brag about causing others to be turned off to the whole idea of hunting. Although hunting can be popular it is prohibited in parks,

In the article “For Environmental Balance, Pick up a Rifle” by Nicholas Kristof, the author informs the reader about the importance of hunting. The piece is aimed at communities who have deer problems. Kristof states hunting should amplify so deer population would decrease. He uses the logo appeal because he uses facts, evidence, and statistics. He also uses pathos by showing emotion when he writes about Bambi and a story about a man’s fight with a deer in his house. The author uses logos and pathos to successfully convince the audience that hunting is the solution to control deer population.

Logos is the use of logical appeals to persuade the audience. With deductive and inductive reasoning, logos is an effective and persuasive way to back up a claim and reach the readers. Pathos, on the other hand, is the use of appealing to one’s emotions in order to persuade. The language and tone the author portrays in their works helps to convince their audience and reach them through their emotions.

In both articles it talks about how hunting is ineffective. In the first article it states this fact, "Studies show that car/deer collisions increase during hunting season because hunters frighten the deer out of the woods and onto roads." (Lin 2). In the

In his article, “Hunting Makes Significant Contributions to Wildlife Protections”, Hal Herring claims that hunters are a strong part of conservation. He states that even though hunters and conservationists don’t see eye-to-eye on many things, they are tied to

Each year, hunters contribute billions of dollars to the economy and conservation efforts. Sadly, without these conservationists, all of the land that is maintained for outdoor recreation would be lost. When a person betters the environment to increase their enjoyment of hunting, they are also indirectly benefiting everything else in the area. The hunters pay for a majority of the land used for bird watching, hiking, and other outdoor sports. Lately, hunting has been under fire for no longer being needed in today's life. Many people do not believe how much hunting contributes to the environment in order to conserve public land. Also, a lot of people do not know of the health benefits of hunting. Along with the benefit of a relatively more active lifestyle, the hunter also enjoys a healthier and completely all natural meat. Hunting is constantly criticized for being no longer needed, but it is shown that hunters not only help conservation efforts, they also lead a healthier lifestyle.

Hunting is what humans do daily in order to survive and it also keeps nature sustainable. But overhunting can hurt this balance and cause a chain of negative reactions that affect the entire planet. This has been an ongoing debate on whether hunting is sustainable or hurtful towards the environment. One can compare Aldo Leopold’s “Thinking Like a Mountain” and Rick Bass’ “Why I Hunt” to determine if hunting today is a safe practice. Aldo Leopold describes hunting as something dark and terrible. He describes it this way because he witnessed something within the wolf and that changed his mind about hunting. While Rick Bass opposes the idea. He believes hunting is a good thing for humans because it benefits the mind.

Hunting is the world’s oldest and most productive means of food, yet it has begun to take a turn from its originality. Most “hunters” do hunt for food, but the select few that specifically hunt for the sport and nothing else have begun to sway organizations to the concept of “Anti-hunting.” These institutions have concluded some very critical, and factual, evidence in their opposing arguments on the matter, but in some ways the argumentation presents weakness that has been overlooked; these flaws are menial, but need to be surfaced. These little defects within the following arguments justify the hunter’s right to hunt and harvest game, and Anti- Hunting organizations such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) have stated multiple facts about the way hunting has turned against its inventiveness such as: sport hunting as an unnecessary form of cruelty, fair chase of animals, and hunters as conservatives.

As noted on the introductory page of this essay, images can incite emotions. Protests centered on protecting children can touch on an emotional basis of pathos. As humans, our natural instinct draws us in; prioritizing the protection of children. While pathos is certainly the highlight in the image containing the phrase, “protect our children”, logos is certainly included.

In this article, Drehle presents the idea that the increase in animal population has become a greater danger than it has ever been before. For instance, Drehle states, “Some 200 americans die each year in more than 1.2 million vehicle collisions with wandering deer--wrecks that cause damage resulting in more than $4 billion in repair (5). This shows that coalitions with wandering animals led many americans to lose their lives in those types of accidents. Furthermore, Drehle supports this idea that animals are becoming a danger with multiple examples through this article. Attention is drawn to the idea that many americans now share their backyards and property with wild life, which was explained to us by Drehle where he explains that a resident of pittsburgh found two white tailed deer scavenging for food in her own living room (Drehle 2). This explains to us that we are now forced to share our own property with the wildlife population due to their rapid increase. According to Drehle, “When the police showed up, they found the picture window smashed, the carpet damaged, the adult deer escaped--and frightened yearling left behind” (2). This proves to us the danger that we are living with due to the cause of animal species now living among us in our own neighborhood. With this in mind, we now have to think of what could be the solution to this issue.