Summary Of Household Women In A Jury Of Her Peers

The first aspect both stories have in common is the fact that both of the women are oppressed by a man in their life.“The

In “A Jury of Her Peers” Minnie Wright demonstrates the deranging effect of isolation. She grew up a joyful young women with all her peers, but drifted away when she became Mrs. Wright and wedded Mr. John Wright. Minnie Wright became socially and emotionally isolated in her own home. This caused her to lose her sanity. The effects that isolation had on Minnie Wright negatively affected her own life and the life of those around her, especially including her husband who she murdered. As the story “A Jury of Her Peers,” progresses it becomes more evident that Minnie Foster is in fact for sure the person who is responsible for the murder of her husband. In the time period “A Jury of her Peers” was written women were also victims of a treatment called the “rest cure.” The rest cure isolated women away from society and in some cases drove them mentally insane as shown in “The Yellow Wallpaper”. The story of “The Yellow Wallpaper” is written by Charlotte Perkins Gilman.

Another similarity between these two stories is that both of the characters have husbands who take

In both stories, each woman was put into a stereotypical role of being housewives. This was popular in history because women did not have much choice or option rather then stay home and cook, clean, take care of their children, etc. Both women were married but instead of appreciating their lives in a joyful perspective, they were oppressed by their living conditions. In both stories, there is a window scene mentioned. The window seems to have symbolism of freedom which is ironic, because in reality they were both trapped in unhappiness. Each time the characters looked through their windows, the outside view is described through the characters perspective in a optimistic and desirable tune, while staying

Although there are several similarities between the two male characters represented in each story, the women, however portrayed differently. Both authors use married men who obsess over unattainable women. The wives depicted in each story have different reactions to their husband’s obsessive conduct. Nonetheless, the obsessiveness covered in both short stories results in rage.

The short stories, “The Story of An Hour”, by Kate Chopin and “The Jury of Her Peers”, by Susan Glaspell compare two married women who live under the shadow of their husbands. Both of these stories were written in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries during the time when women were treated unequally. Women had limited rights. For example, they could not vote, voice their opinion or work outside the home. Glaspell and Chopin were considered feminist writers who focus their writing on the struggle of women during the time when the Women’s Suffrage Movement was beginning; these short stories reflect women’s struggles under the control of men. Married women were responsible for taking care of the household, children and wifely duties while the husbands were responsible for consistently managing the title of “the breadwinner.” Married women were expected to be discreet and obedient to their husbands, which meant that the wives could not express their opinions because of society’s expectations of women. In the short stories, “The Story of An Hour”, by Kate Chopin and “The Jury of Her Peers”, by Susan Glaspell, Mrs. Mallard and Mrs. Wright share a prominent similarity concerning the loss of their individual identity during marriage and realize that the death of their husbands allow them to regain their self-identity.-

Upon hearing the news, Mrs. Mallard is overwhelmed with grief, which swiftly turned into hope. Mrs. Mallard’s reaction upon receiving the news of her husband 's death is considered to be unusually by society’s standards. In the beginning of the story it is revealed that Mrs, Mallard suffers heart problems; however, when it is revealed that her husband is dead her heart is relieved. She was thrilled that she was able to be her own person again. It was revealed through her reflection on her marriage that she “had loved him - sometimes” (16). Mrs. Mallard overcame is quick to overcome her grief after the realization that she has been set free of her horrible marriage. As a married woman, Mrs. Mallard is miserable, but as a widow she feels a sense of relief that she is free of her marital vows. At the end of the story Mrs. Mallard dies of a failing heart which it ironic because typically a woman would be filled with joy to find out

Soon, excitement wears off, and reality sets in. For many generations, even into the early twentieth century, women all over the world fall as victims into the deep, never-ending hole of domestic violence. In “The Story of an Hour,” Louise Mallard accepts her fate as being submissive and obedient to her husband even though her life as the “perfect wife” is nothing less than torturous. In “A Jury of Her Peers,” the self-confidence and self-esteem of Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters are continuously diminished publicly by their husbands. Mr. Peters puts down the very act of Mrs. Minnie’s household duties when he states, “Well, can you beat the women!

Mrs. Mallard had, "in that brief moment of illumination"(15), stumbled upon a truth: she was now her own person, free from the confines of her husband. She had loved her husband, "sometimes"(15), but that didn't matter: "What could love ....count for in the face of theis possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being! THE theme of the story unfolds at this point: Mrs. Mallard, through the death of her husband, is able to experience the joy of the realization

Both stories had a diffrent perspective on Females, but at the same time they had similar mindset of a topic. The two stories showed how females weren’t treated equally as men do. That is proven from the story “The Judge’s Wife,” by showing and explaning to the reader that Casilda wasnt happy about her marrige and was forced into it. In the story “The House on Mango Street,” The reader also knows that Sally was physically abused by her father and that also showed that she had no right no stop it. These two novels reminds me when women had no rights, not even on voteing, working, and

In “A Jury of Her Peers”, Susan Glaspell uses the theme of the feminine to illustrate how women stick together in times of strife. Throughout the story, the men make fun of and tease the women because of the little "trifles" that only they, the women, are concerned about. Simply put, the men don't understand why the women act the way they do to things of such little insignificance. This bond that the women share is further emphasized with the quilt. In the last few lines of the story, the court attorney states "at least we found out that she was not going to quilt it. She was going to--what is it you call it, ladies?". Again, the men are left completely unaware of anything to do with keeping the house. The women notice the little details that

Mrs. Mallard is a young woman living life day by day with heart disease, insecurities and a broken marriage. Mrs. Mallard has to live with heart disease as well as her many insecurities and a husband whom she is not sure that she loves. This is not an attractive way to live and her seemingly countless hardships eventually take her life. Due to the circumstances under which Mrs. Mallard lived, I can easily state that she is a sympathetic character in the story. Throughout the short story the difficulties that encompass Mrs. Mallard seemingly never end.

Finally, the reader is introduced to the character around whom the story is centered, the accursed murderess, Mrs. Wright. She is depicted to be a person of great life and vitality in her younger years, yet her life as Mrs. Wright is portrayed as one of grim sameness, maintaining a humorless daily grind, devoid of life as one regards it in a normal social sense. Although it is clear to the reader that Mrs. Wright is indeed the culprit, she is portrayed sympathetically because of that very lack of normalcy in her daily routine. Where she was once a girl of fun and laughter, it is clear that over the years she has been forced into a reclusive shell by a marriage to a man who has been singularly oppressive. It is equally clear that she finally was brought to her personal breaking point, dealing with her situation in a manner that was at once final and yet inconclusive, depending on the outcome of the legal investigation. It is notable that regardless of the outcome, Mrs. Wright had finally realized a state of peace within herself, a state which had been denied her for the duration of her relationship with the deceased.

Murder is one of the most vile, inhuman crimes a person can commit. “A Municipal Report” by O. Henry and “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell both involve a vindictive murder of an abusive husband and the hiding of incriminating evidence, however, the two stories also differ in their purposes. Henry takes the reader through an implausible series of events, taking the reader away from reality, while Glaspell illustrates the vital individual decisions as well as the morality that goes with murder, domestic violence, and feminism. “A Municipal Report” does not do more than entertain the reader, and is commercial fiction, while “A Jury of Her Peers” reveals truths about human life, and is literary fiction. There are significant differences

There seems to be a theme in both the stories, both the women seem lonely and isolated, and there was major miscommunication in both relationships. The relationships both have unfulfilled wishes in the story. In “Cat” the woman keeps asking her husband if he thinks she should grow her hair out. Her husband’s only response was I like it just the way it is.