Many struggle to succinctly define creativity, whether as an innate gift, cultivated talent, or product of circumstances. In his essay “On Creativity,” Isaac Asimov introduces more questions than answers as he attempts to define creativity as a process. Simultaneously writing against and in favor of individuality as the key to ideation, Asimov writes a comprehensive guide to forming creative ideas. Although he argues for the removal of formality and rigidity in creative acts, Asimov’s paradoxically strict directions for what is and is not appropriate revoke some of the sincerity from his words. Through inconsistencies in the development of his definition of the creative process as simultaneously individual and communal, the unreliability in Asimov’s narration draws attention away from his argument and towards his context, ultimately illustrating the fundamental nature of creativity as a spontaneous act rather than the product of a series of carefully followed steps.
The many contradictions in Asimov’s rules for the creative process weaken his argument by interrupting his flow of logic with non-committal and ambiguous statements. Asimov’s main contradiction occurs when he fails to adhere to his original position on the necessity of solitude to promote creative ideas. Although he originally states that “isolation is required,” he later claims that “a meeting […] may be desirable”. In the context of the rest of the essay, Asimov’s revised position is distinct in that it uses
The beauty of creativity is that it is abstract, yet ubiquitous: in art, music or how one decides to compose an essay. However, creativity has recently been declining among the human population. According to an article, named, “The Creativity Crisis,” by Newsweek.com in July 2010, authors, Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman, state, “the Torrance Test … indicates that the public’s “creativity quotient” has steadily crept downward since 1990” (Prompt 1). Bronson and Merryman report that the test, which evaluates one’s creativity, had been dispensed to myriads of people across the globe, and have concluded that creativity has been slowly diminishing. Kyung Hee Kim, professor at the College of William and Mary, also comments that this is most prevalent and grave among students from kindergarten through sixth grade (Prompt 1). Consequently, society, or in this case, the world fears that current students and future generations will not be nourished with the creativity required to thrive as individuals, affecting the world as a whole. Ultimately, this poses the question whether a creative thinking class, which solely focuses on the education of creativity, should be taught in the school. This school should impose a creative thinking class, due to the fact creativity is a vital element for the future and is the solution to the creative crisis.
In the novel "What the Best College Students Do" by Ken Bain he states that learning is not only discovering new abilities, it is putting a creative twist into it (p. 4). He places Paul Baker (a professor that taught Integration of Abilities) in this story because he emphasizes what Bain is trying to convey (pp. 2-3). Baker states that "This is a class in discovering your own creative ability and all you will have to help you with your discovery is yourself and getting acquainted with the way you work" (p. 4). Everybody has different viewpoints because everyone has different backgrounds, therefore, creativity is not only a want it is a necessity. To deeply learn something, students needs to have a
S. I. Hayakawa wrote and published an article named "What lt Means to Be Creative". This article challenged how a creative person could be defined and identified. In Hayakawa’s essay he presents several points of view an individual could be characterized as being creative. His writing forces you to contemplate on how a person’s aptitudes are categorized. Hayakawa tests your ability to be opened minded and makes you visualize how a person could be described as a creative individual but may discredited themselves due to society’s standard of this word. After reading his writing, I believe I can summarize his analogy.
I found Lott’s arguments extremely compelling and although he initially stated that there is no destination for the pursuit of a definition, I feel as if his conclusion has found a valid one. Throughout the essay Lott presents new concepts and ideas subsequent to his original definition. By the end he combines these into a very comprehensive and easily identifiable model of creative
Creativity within relationships is vital for a seemingly healthy relationship. Creativity is ‘often associated with imagination and inspiration in the arts.. also vital for problem solving and development of new ideas’ (Taylor and Turner 2016a). Psychologist’s see creativity important because of it’s economic and cultural importance; Mihaly Csikszentmihaly suggested that ‘being creative involves a state of concentration and total involvement’ (Csikszentmihalyi, cited in Taylor and Turner 2016). Some psychologists assume that creativity is a characteristic only few hold, where as it is now argued that anybody can be creative given the right pathway. Taylor and Turner have split creativity into three frameworks; creative contexts, creative collaboration’s and creative groups and cultures.
What creativity actually is when you use your imagination, allowing things in the mind to occur that wouldn’t actually occur and also things to better the world. “Being creative is not only about thinking: it is about feeling” (160). You can not just think but you have to have feelings to make sure that you doing things right and feeling like you made something productive in the time. Being creative requires a long process, “magination which is the process of bringing to mind things that are not present to our senses; creativity, which is the process of developing original ideas that
A Synthesizing and creative mind as Gardner terms them goes side by side as synthesis takes up information from a variety of sources and interprets them objectively. The result is a well-arranged representation of information as it keeps on mounting. Creativity comes in to evaluate the synthesized information and develop ideas or solutions to break new ground. The concept follows the same variable as Fernandez, which accrues the terms curiosity, insight, and creativity. Curiosity, as mired by Fernandez, is the idea of seeking new experiences bounded by knowledge and moreover acknowledged with the willingness to learn and adapt to change (Fernandez 2014). He accords curiosity with insight as one must be able to make sense of the information and the knowledge. The understanding of two results into a creative process that assesses the environment and finds alternatives to the challenges which are a strength for success in the twenty-first century.
In the context of creativity’s stated definition, we will proceed to group our arguments into three themes of factors: cognitive ability, expertise training, and environmental conditions. The human brain is highly adaptable and can continue to develop new cognitive abilities, even past adulthood (Norman, 2015). Proper cognitive expertise and training can help workers produce and operate in ingenious ways (Ginamarie, Lertiz & Mumford, 2004). Finally, the working environment can both motivate or stifle creative output. Managers can influence all three components: expertise, thinking skills, and motivation (Amabile, 1998).
Creativity is in every one of us; some people choose to use it, some and some choose to just put it aside thinking that they are not smart enough, or don’t have the ability to be creative. The two famous creative thinkers that I choose to present is Steven Allan Spielberg and Cornel Ronald West. Two individual that is famous for using their creative thinking that impacted the society and history. This paper will focus on their individual unique contribution to society, the ideas south to solve any specific issues, personal, social and political acquirement, creative thinking process and a critique of their ideas.
Ashton Bellamy Ms. Wilson AP English III 29 September 2014 American Creativity Thesis The American creativity has slowly declined in the past few years due to the technological advances which have made life more convenient and also less demanding on people, which is a complete shift from the way the early peoples who came to America. The earliest American settlers would have approached situations and tasks differently because encountering challenging situations needed a logical answer to counteract the situation. Creativity can affect many aspects of one’s life, including their government, religion, as well as shaping the demographics of the country, and has nestled itself in society.
Each developed idea or article created by humankind origin in some type of creative activity. Such as, Thomas Edison create a light bulb by attempt an astonishing array of possible filaments. Humankind landed on the moon, because a president visualize that it was possible. Beethoven draft the Fifth Symphony by amalgamate musical notes and ideas in a new and indigenous way. Living with creative is a basic feature of what it means to be human being. Except it is prevent in some way, the momentum to creativity excursion people to do new object or article, whether it is a student in a kindergarten finding a new way to irritate a teacher, an artist made a distinctive brand of
Creative intelligence is an innate characteristic with which we are born; this is an aspect in the development of our mental
The term creativity is used for the purpose of describing the ability that is concerned with the process of creating something new or valuable. This ability allows a person to surpass the rules, practices, methods, forms or similar kind of activities that the traditional society may be performing at that time. Creativity is one of the most important things that have allowed the people of the society to move forward and urge for development. All the development that has been made in various aspects of human life can be directly connected with the creativity. All the industry leaders of the world have secured this place because of the level of creativity and innovation that they showed. They used this creativity for creating something new that has allowed them to develop completely new methods for this purpose.
Throughout this creative arts class, I have learned much about creativity and how it fits in our world around us. I see myself as creative person and am so thankful that I understand and appreciate God’s gift of creativity given to us. We are to use our creativity to glorify God in all that we do. I appreciate all of God’s creation and use it to be more creative. My views of creativity have changed by learning more about how creativity has been valued over time in our cultures. Creativity is essential for sustainability in the future. I believe that creativity will continue to change over time. Werner (2000) sums this up, “I believe that as our lives and our global ideology of creativity evolve, we will acknowledge more clearly both how much lies beyond creativity, and how creativity is our human drive toward the beyond” (p. 270).
According to the ethnographic approach defined by Papen and Tusting (2006, p.312-359), creativity refers the production of something ‘new’ and ‘original’. In written language, creativeness should not be perceived as a decontextualised, individual activity or as being entirely shaped by context. It should be seen as being dependent on and emergent from the creative literacy practices through which texts are constructed because they are shaped by people, who in pursuit of their own