preview

Summary Of Jason Deleon's 'The Land Of Open Graves'

Decent Essays
Open Document

Throughout Jason DeLeon’s The Land of Open Graves: Living and Dying on the Migrant Trail, it is clear that DeLeon adopts a style of ethnography that is inherently different from Evens-Pritchard’s The Nuer. DeLeon represents a key shift in anthropological theory and ethnographic writing that helps to construct a rich, raw and authentic account of undocumented migrants and their journey across the US/ Mexico border. Throughout this ethnography, DeLeon argues that the United States’ border policies are ineffective in deterring migrants, but instead provide an opportunity to hide behind the hybrid collectif of the Sonoran Desert which creates a level of inhumanity that is indescribable. DeLeon draws on the four fields of anthropology, including …show more content…

DeLeon’s main argument, as pointed out on page three, is that, “The terrible things that this mass of migrating people experience en route are neither random nor senseless, but rather a part of a strategic federal plan that has been publicly illuminated and exposed for what it is: a killing machine that simultaneously uses and hides behind the viciousness of the Sonoran Desert.” (2015:3-4) Throughout the entire ethnography, DeLeon focuses on the policies in place that attribute to the brutal deaths and sufferings that the undocumented migrants must go through, such as the PTD (Prevention Through Deterrence) as well as the personal journeys and stories of the undocumented migrants and their families, and the things that they endure on a daily basis. He argues that the human consequences of the US border policies are inhumane and quite frankly, disgusting. Finally, he argues that these policies do not, and have not, deterred people from trying to cross the border into the United States for a “better life”, but instead they just make it as difficult and brutal as possible by sending them through what DeLeon refers to as the “killing machine”. (2015:3-4)
Throughout The Land of Open Graves: Living and Dying on the Migrant Trail, DeLeon makes use of each field of anthropology as he draws on archaeological, ethnographic, …show more content…

From semi-structured to un-structured interviews to participant-observation, DeLeon extracts a large portion of his data using these techniques. DeLeon uses interviewing in a multitude of ways, which is visible throughout the entire book, as each chapter contains some representation of interviewing, whether structured or unstructured, or a personal account of someone’s story or journey. He also includes pieces of “semi-fictionalized ethnography” (2015:43), which takes interviews and data collected from a plethora of people and compiles it into one, concise account. (2015:44) In regards to participant-observation, DeLeon lives with the migrants in the Juan Bosco shelter, as well as lives with some of the families he is interviewing (which is visible in the later chapters) as well as following his work to wherever he needs to be. In chapter five, DeLeon mentions how he is sleeping in Juan Bosco on a little sleeping mat that had been left for him as the bed had been entirely filled up. (2015:126) This shows complete immersion into his work, as he is not taking any shortcuts or skipping out on any of the data that could have been retrieved throughout his time at Juan

Get Access