Summary Of Life In The Arctic National Wildlife By Jimmy Carter

In his essay “Forward,” Jimmy Carter, vilifies the oil drilling industry and its attempt to destroy the beautiful Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, home to over 8.9 million acres of national parks, refuges and forests. Carter builds a sentimental argument using imagery and ethos, passionately defending this sacred land. By the end of this piece, the reader will likely find themselves feeling a sense of agreement with the former president, like any good political speaker he connects with the reader and establishes a sense of equality, with tactical reasoning and persuasive devices to plead with the audience to take his side. Correspondingly to the introduction, Jimmy Carter ignites a picture in the reader’s mind of the flourishing wildlife that

To begin explaining his viewpoint, Carter relates to his audience an account of when he and his wife traveled to the Arctic. What they saw was nothing short of breathtaking. The indigenous flora and fauna inspired awe with their brilliancy. The Carters witnessed the spectacle of a myriad of caribou migrating along with their newborns. He described this experience as "unforgettable and humbling" (Carter 3). This rendition invokes a majestic view of the wildlife in the Arctic Refuge. Carter makes use of this to move his audience to adopt the perspective that the unaffected region is precious.

Jimmy Carter begins his essay the sentence, “This magnificent area is as vast as it is wild, from windswept coastal plain where polar bears and caribou give birth…” This specific sentence gives way to a wide array of emotions and feelings due to his way of descriptive language. His language and word choice makes you feel as if you are there with him absorbing what it feels like to be there. The way he describes this refuge makes you imagine what “the brilliant mosaic of wildflowers, mosses, and lichens that hugged the tundra.” encompasses and what this mosaic resembles. When Jimmy Carter talks about what saddens him, it makes you think of what this place of grandeur could look

In his Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey, Jimmy Carter effectively convinces his audience that the wilderness of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industrial purposes. He first appeals to his readers' emotions through a detailed account of his personal experience in the Arctic Refuge. He goes on to refute those pushing for the development of the Arctic Refuge by providing an easy solution to their reason. Finally, he calls his readers to action by saying that we should keep one of America's last great wildernesses intact.

Waking up to discover the immense, pristine wilderness of Alaska, listening to the birds chirping their sounds while feeling the tremble of your heart beating through your veins. Trees as far as one can see with rolling hills and distant peaks covered with unblemished snow. The sounds of streams growing larger until they rush over a fall, and into an untainted lake. Pondering the true meaning of life while observing Mother Nature’s true grace. Very few people can relate to this scene of the wild. One of them being Christopher Johnson McCandless, a young pioneer and traveler, who was determined to seek the truth no matter what the cost.

Jimmy Carter, the 39th president of the United States, makes a compelling argument in his article, “Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.” He uses his own passion and stylistic abilities to persuade readers to consider the wilderness and the environment around us an essential, precious part of our world. To get his point across, he uses his personal anecdotes to convey passion and ardor to the readers, good vocabulary and word choice to evoke images and emotions, and strong directives with the pronoun “we” to put himself on the same level as his readers so it’s easier to relate to him. Using those 3 rhetorical devices, Carter is able to successfully convince his readers that this wildlife refuge is a crucial region to take prudent action with. One of the most prevalent rhetorical strategies seen in Carter’s article is personal anecdotes. In this article specifically, he includes an abundance of his personal experiences to kindle the minds of his readers. In fact, an entire paragraph is dedicated to narrating his time at the coastal plain in the Arctic. “One of the most unforgettable and humbling experiences of our lives occurred on the coastal plain. We had hoped to see caribou during our trip, but to our amazement, we witnessed the migration of tens of thousands of caribou with their newborn calves.” Explaining a moment in his own life gives the reader a chance to imagine what it was like to see such a beautiful sight. Though the audience may not have visited this place, his explanation evokes images and personal feelings in the reader’s mind. Relating personal experiences to his audience is one of the most effective ways to persuade and inform the readers. In summary, Carter successfully used personal anecdotes in his article; furthermore, inviting the audience to take a look into the most unforgettable moment of Carter’s life. In turn, this brings emotions toward wildlife into the reader’s mind. Another effective strategy that Carter uses in the article is good choice of vocabulary. Good word choice evokes more powerful images than it would with average vocabulary. To explain further, Carter appeals to good word choice in a specific paragraph in his article. “During bright July days, we walked along ancient

Carter begins by verbally illustrating the beauty of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. In the passage Carter says, "During bright July days, we walked along ancient caribou trails and studied the brilliant mosaic of wildflowers, mosses, and lichens that hugged the tundra." In

Jimmy Carter uses imagery throughout his argumentative article to persuade his readers. The author uses imagery because he knows if he paint a good enough picture in his readers’ heads of this beautiful place, the readers are more likely to agree with him that this Arctic Refuge should not be used for industrial purposes because it will be destroyed. For example, “This magnificent area is as vast as it is wild.” Jimmy Carter uses words like “magnificent” and “vast” because he knows that those word are used to describe beautiful places like the Arctic Refuge. Which is how the author use imagery to efficiently persuade his readers to reserve the Arctic Refuge.

Jimmy Carter is a well known Democratic president who served between 1977 to 1981 who strongly opposed opening the Arctic Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling. His writing on the preservation of the refuge came after his term as president while new proposals were being put forward for drilling. Carter’s argument is very effective at encouraging the National Arctic Wildlife Refuge to be protected. Carter effectively uses logos, ethos, and pathos to construct a strong argument for the refuge to be preserved.

Bears in Alaska Bears in Alaska are calm mammals that are mistaken for dangerous animals. Alaska has three different types of bears, which include the black bear, grizzly/brown bear, and polar bear. In Alaska there are "bears in Brooks Falls because there's a lot of fish." (Glanfield) There are bears in Alaska known as Kodiak bears that are found only in the islands of the Kodiak Archipelago and they have been isolated there since the last Ice Age.

In Jimmy Carter's foreword Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the former president addresses the importance of protecting and preserving the beautiful arctic wildlife. Carter urges the American people to take on this issue by: providing imagery of the Arctic to illustrate its beauty and diverse wildlife for the audience to visualize, stressing the importance of the wildlife refuge's relationship to the country's heritage, and pointing out its significance and impact to the country. With these topics, Carter builds a strong argument that draws in the audience and convinces them.

In this sophisticated picture book, I really connected with the main character, Gus who is a polar bear, because he made me think about friendship, love and death in a different and gentler way. Because from the very start, to the very end of this book, Gus was always lonely, and as soon as something good happened in his life, it disappeared as quickly as it came. Gus lives in an enormous zoo in an even larger city, and apart from the children and zoo keepers coming to see Gus, Gus had no one he could actually communicate with. Until one day Ida, a female polar bear came. Ida and Gus incredibly quickly became the best of friends, and Ida was always with Gus. Then one miserable day, Gus learns that Ida is dreadfully sick, and she will not heal.

First, President Carter uses an anecdote to strengthen his claim that the Wildlife Refuge is "wild and free." With vivid description, he recounts an experience that he had while visiting the Refuge. He describes a particular occurrance, when he witnessed caribou migrating

The polar bears are dying rapidly, and if we don’t start thinking about the environment then they will blow out to extinction. Polar bears, known as the bears of antarctica, are magnificent animals. They are the top consumer for most prey. Without them, the secondary consumer would overpopulate and eventually lose control and take over.

In the beginning of the novel Leopold begins by giving the reader the census of changing of ecosystems, exploring the interactions among animals as well as plants and the impact of interactions through the seasons. He widens the field, giving the reader a realistic idea of landscapes. Leopold also goes on to share in the second section his journey to various farms and places throughout the United States, not holding anything back. Leopold addresses the important issues such as declining natural