Summary Of Men In 'The Charge Of The Light Brigade'

Alfred Tennyson wrote the “Charge of the Light Brigade” in 1854 and it is about the battle of Balaclava in the Crimean war. Although this battle had no real influence on the outcome of the war it showed the bravery of six hundred British soldiers who charged into almost certain death. The poem itself is a patriotic ballad keeping up with the tradition of the time. The poem is heroic and romantic.

The Charge of the Light Brigade by Tennyson "The charge of the light brigade" by Tennyson was written about a

“The Charge of the Light Brigade” is full of emotion and excitement. Neither of those sensations would have been possible without the use of literary devices. Tennyson used repetition, sensory details, and epistrophe in order to add to the emotional effect, but more importantly to aid him in proving the soldiers’ bravery. Without these literary devices, the poem

The themes of the two poems are portrayed in very distinctive ways. ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ explains in a majestic approach, that fighting in war is something every soldier should honour. The poem is

so well.” “They came back from the mouth of hell, all that was left of

War is a scandalous topic where peoples’ views differ as to what war is. Some people see it as pure evil and wicked while others think that it is brave and noble of what soldiers do. Looking at poems which had been written by people affected by war help show the messages which are portrayed. The two sets of poems which show different views of war as well as some similarities are “the Charge of the Light Brigade” by Alfred Lord Tennyson, “To Lucasta, on Going to the Wars” by Richard Lovelace and “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen, “The Song of the Mud” by Mary Borden. Both these poets use linguistic devices to convince the reader of their view of what the war is. Tennyson and Lovelace show how war is worthy

He ordered his men to take up “street firing” positions. He was preparing his men to attack the oncoming rebels. The Redcoats set up their street firing positions from behind the bridge perpendicular to the river. Captain Laurie was inexperienced and called the wrong tactical maneuver for the situation. The street firing tactic was appropriate for sending a large volume of fire into a narrow alley between the buildings of a city, but not for an open path behind a bridge. Confusion ensued as the Redcoats started retreating over the bridge in an attempt to form up in the street-firing position. Redcoat Lieutenant (LT) William Sutherland, who was in the rear of the formation, knew that maneuver was not adequate for the situation and ordered flankers to be sent out. LT Sutherland was from a different company and only four soldiers obeyed him. The remainder of the troops, despite the confusion, followed the orders of the superior officer. (1775, 04/19: Battles of Lexington and Concord. (2007, June 26).

This is an example of accepting prudent risk. However, here, the general made a poor choice because he could have utilized those brigades had they dismounted upon landing. The accounts of why he made this particular decision vary greatly. Some historians believe he did it because he did not have the resources to transport the troops from Egypt to Turkey. Other accounts argue that he did not believe that the enemy merited the extra troops. Regardless of the reason behind the choice, the general did not correctly exercise prudent risk in this case.

The Militia kept attacking and following the British as they retreated, which directly caused the deaths of their own men as well as some British soldiers. According to both sources, after the British retreated and effectively surrendered they were followed by the Militia and constantly attacked, ambushed and shot at as they walked 15 miles carrying their dead and wounded. The rebels had won, and yet they continued to slaughter the Red Coats as they retreated. This was unnecessary and completely barbaric on their part. And it clearly shows that the deaths on both sides are their fault. If the Militia hadn’t followed the British then none of the Troops that were killed from that moment on would have died because the British had retreated. Why they did it will most likely never be known, but the utter savagery of the rebel’s acts should never be forgotten. In fact, A British Account explains that, “...Such was the cruelty and barbarity of the rebels, that they scalped and cut off the ears of some of the wounded men who fell into their hands…” Men who were already wounded, that lay dying alone in puddles of blood spent their last moments being scalped, cut and trampled in the fray. Scalping in and of itself is tremendously painful and can be fatal due to blood loss, but to take someone who is already wounded and commit such an act upon them? That would take utter barbarity and a complete lack of concern. The rebels and their cowardly, cruel actions were completely at fault not only for the crimes perpetrated at those battles but for the large body count left

In the poem Charge of the Light Brigade Alfred Lord Tennyson tells the story of a light brigade consisting of 600 soldiers charging on horseback into the “valley of death” during the Battle of Balaclava during the Crimean War in 1953-56 where they fought against Russian and Cossack forces. The poem tells of the journey that soldiers take through battle. Tennyson uses repetition, personification, and diction to make this poem flow.

The Portrayal of War in Charge of the Light Brigade and Dulce et Decorum Est

them are on the same topic of war but have many contrasts in how they

Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce Et Decorum Est,” written in 1918 during WWI, and Alfred Tennyson’s “The Charge of the Light Brigade,” written in 1854 during the Battle of Balaclava both analyze the effects of war through their elements and tone words. However, the meanings of the poems differ immensely. In “Dulce Et Decorum Est” the writer portrays a soldier being scarred for life as a result of viewing a fellow comrade being choked to death on poison gas. In contrast, the author of “The Charge of the Light Brigade” instead chooses to admire the bravery and courage of the Light Brigade, even though they knew they might not return from battle.

Soldiers are trained to always follow orders, and to never question orders. But that belief is somewhat illogical. Soldier's are to obey any lawful order given. But the training involved, the often chaotic nature of battle, and the need to follow authority to maintain survival can lead to a very blurred vision of what is right or wrong. One's animalistic instincts may take over. Sometimes there are such situations when you've stepped over the line. Such as the horrendous act that took place on March 16, 1968 in the village of Son My.

Analysis of “The Charge of the Light Brigade” Imagine the horrors of war. That is something that can be made more understandable when reading “The Charge of the Light Brigade,” a poem written by Alfred, Lord Tennyson. Word choice, repetition, and figurative language are all aspects of this poem that affect my understanding of the historical events. Word choice can greatly impact how well a reader understands the text.