preview

Summary Of Ohio Women's Convention By Sarah Stickney Ellis

Decent Essays

Between the article written by Sarah Stickney Ellis and the article from the Ohio Women’s Convention, two competing perspectives of women’s rights and gender equality are displayed. From opinions provided by Sarah Stickney Ellis, women should not be involved in politics, men are entitled to women treating them as superior, women have certain obligations to their husbands, and men and women have different natures, which is why they should be treated differently. Her article regularly expresses the belief that women and men are not equals with the latter superior to the former. In almost complete discrepancy to what Sarah Stickney Ellis said, the Ohio Women’s Convention believes that women should be involved in politics and the government, …show more content…

Ellis said that women were not supposed to comment on the specifics of politics, but instead keep conversations about politics by males away from “unobtrusive and sensitive” topics. Women were only supposed to use their “good management to turn off from one subject and play upon another.” Contrary to what Ellis believes, the Ohio Women’s Convention believed that women should not only be involved in politics but they should have a place in the government as well. The Ohio Women’s Convention said that “the prohibition of Woman from participating in the enactment of the laws by which she is governed is a direct violation of this precept of Nature” meaning that it is not fair for women to be governed by a government in which they have no control. The Ohio Women’s Convention wanted to push for women to be involved in government because it applies to all citizens “without distinction of sex” whereas Sarah Stickney Ellis believed that women had no place in the …show more content…

The Ohio Women’s Convention thought that “all rights are human rights” and that laws are made “not to man, or to woman, but for mankind.” The Convention believed in gender equality as it applies to government and laws because women are not the “weaker-vessel.” Sarah Stickney Ellis, on the other hand, believed that women were inferior to men and that “it is unquestionably the right of all men… to be treated with deference” by women. Ellis noted that it was the nature of men to “maintain… a greater degree than woman,” meaning that it was man’s nature to be superior to women, once more providing different viewpoints on

Get Access