My interpretation of the 6 bases of power from Jack Dunigan are as follow,
• Official power - Is an office or position and it gives the person the authority to exercise power • Transactional power -is a person who has a high position in the chain of command or is looked upon as someone with authority. • Coercive power - is having the ability to penalize or punish others if what was asked of them was not completed or abided. • Knowledge power - Is the having the capability of understanding that there is a goal or tasked that needs to be accomplished or completed and the person is also able to find a solution to a problem and ultimately knowing what the problem is and what needs to get done to fix it. • Charismatic power - Is being well known and having a positive reputation follow your journey giving the perception that you know what you are doing one might be consider it being held up on a pedestal. • Principle-centered power -Is the ability to inspire and motivate others and encourage another to act on a decision or idea. (Dunigan, 2013).
It is accounted for that Sharon took the position at Netflix on the grounds that she felt their qualities (beliefs and
…show more content…
Accomplish more than is normal or leave, she had high standards for the employees and the quality of work provided. To be given this power to set this objective is an or more for Sharon to have backing for her choices on who goes and who remains. Sharon utilized her coercive power to motivate workers to give the best. Sharon accepted the CHRO position at Netflix because the company’s values and morals aligned with hers. By being transparent and letting them know what was expected of them she gave the employee the opportunity to exceed expectations in their performance and if that wasn't the case, results would be to be
Expert Power – Obtaining compliance through one’s knowledge or information. Managers generally have this power since they tend to have information that their employees don’t.
1Power- having control due to a position, being able to do more because you have the authority to.
There are many definitions of power but my definition of power is to rule over, or to have
Power is the ability to control others or one’s entity. Accordingly it can be defined as a kind of strength or as an authority. There are various theorisations about the meaning of this term in sociology thus it would be hard to give a comprehensive
In addition to power established because of organizational hierarchy or role, power is also established based on the level of influence or status one holds in an organization (Anichich, Fast, Halevy, Galinsky, 2016). “Status is the outcome of an evaluation of attributes that produce differences in respect and prominence” (Ketner et al, 2003 p. 266) They co-exists but are not co-dependent on each other. It’s possible to have status without power and power without status (Ketner et al, 2003). Whether one’s control comes through status or positional power, lauding control or significant influence over another inevitably leads to conflict.
Power refers to the ownership of power and impact over others. Contingent upon how power is utilized, it can prompt positive or negative conclusions in an association. Control in individuals is similar to power in batteries; the higher the voltage of battery, the more electromotive energy it can convey; subsequently, it can have more noteworthy effect. Likewise, individuals with more prominent wellsprings of force are better ready to lead and impact others than individuals with less and lesser wellsprings of force. The all the more influential you are, the more impact you ought to have. Persons can have master force; referent force; prize force; coercive power or true blue force.
Power is used in various forms all over society. It is the ability to have control over others however this ability can be cherished or abused.
Power can be defined in many ways. Most simply, it is the ability to get what you want.
Power is defined as a political action coerced to exercise or to pursuit. It influences and controls the content of political power. The theory of power is argued by Niccolo Machiavelli, Hannah Arendt, and Karl Emil (Max) Weber. Machiavelli’s position stood that power is held by individuals. As for Arendt, she believed power was maintained within groups, while Weber believed power lied in institutions.
Power in politics is a person who has the ability to influence a person in terms of their behaviour; however they possess no right to - unlike authority. There are many ways in which a person can influence another’s behaviour; one such example is through coercion. Coercion refers to the use of violence or threats in order to influence someone. [Jones and Norton, 2011]
Power is the emphasis is an employment situation. While employed you have a certain amount of power, both over your work environment and your own life.
Power is having the capability or qualification to do something or control something. The idea of power is often analyzed in the Truman Show and Animal farm. In the Truman Show, Peter Weir suggests that power can be bad and that people shouldn’t have power
Coercive power: being able to punish others for not doing what needs to be done
The management can use this power to demote, transfer, fire or deny raises to their employees. The third power base of Position is legitimate power. This power stems from the level of hierarchy in which the subordinates report directly to the authority over them for decisions. Process Power controls the input and output of organizations to make sure that the processes are carried out efficiently and effectively within. Information power is the control of information or access to it within an organization. Information can be controlled to a ?need to know? basis and/or just limited to the upper management. This type of power compliments the legitimate power. Finally, there is Representative power in which an organization uses an individual to be there spokesperson both within the organization and when dealing with people outside of the organization.
Comparatively, positional power also has a great significance use in our daily lives. Police officers, lawyers, teachers, parents, managers and even just a normal person has some sort of positional power. This common power is specified as having authority and influence over another person. A person with positional power is coercive, which means they have power over others. For example, parents can make their children do something that they don 't want to do since the child wouldn 't have any choice. A police officer can also use their title as an advantage to have authority over us which means if we disobey them, there will be consequences, simply because of their positional power. The difference