Summary Of The Atlantic Citylab

When a neighborhood is gentrified it will not only change the image of it, but also the services available there (Al-Kodmany 2011, 62-63). In other words, gentrification does not only have an impact on the physical aspect of the land, but also the resources that lie there. During the 90s, the Near West Side neighborhood located near Loop, an up-scale neighborhood, sought drastic changes within the area. The changes in racial demographics in the Near West Side indicated that the health risks that affected minorities dropped in the past decade (1992-2002) (Al-Kodmany 2011,

The author explained how the government established policies and initiatives that created ghettos and suburbs. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) is a program that helped citizens become homeowners by lending loans. However, only certain neighborhoods qualified for those loans. Research and data were used to prove that certain areas were considered a loss of investment. The

Some problems associated with living in a neighborhood with a high percentage of the population living in poverty include increased crime rates, poor education, health problems and psychological distress. The concentration of people in high poverty neighborhoods magnifies the problems faced by the poor. This is because it leads to the concentration of the ills associated with poverty. Children in these neighborhood do not only lack basic needs but are also exposed to an hostile environment that holds numerous temptations and does not provide positive motivation (McConville & Ong, 2003). In addition, because schools are distributed geographically, children from high poverty neighborhoods attend the same schools and this result in low performance. This concentration also intensify the shift of the middle and higher income families away from these neighborhoods thus creating a gap between social needs and the financial base necessary to address these issues. The concentration of poverty is important because it has an impact on the distribution of income which might undermines the social fabric and may restrict opportunities for others (Jargowsky, 2003).

I thought cities had more diversity, more poverty, and low income household than suburb areas and this was supported by the above data. I learned that the increase of wealth and income in a small community hinders the rest of community where middle and low income families live. The ability to live in a “good” neighborhood is linked to income. Income can be one of the factors that determine how a region can be segregated. Even in the city, the income of the household separates the lower income families from the higher income families. High income families tend to live together and low income families tend to live in the same

There are many changes that I have observed in my neighborhood since living here for 21 years. There has been a recent migration of homeowners moving out of the neighborhoods. The home owners are either renting out their homes, to a new influx of section 8 tenants or they have chosen to walk away from their homes leaving many in the area to go into foreclosure. Foreclosure and crime are two of the biggest element of change that I have noticed in my neighborhood, and many of these problems arise from the economy, health and illness, and familial structure breakdown.

The study examined data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN). They created 847 census tracts to create 343 neighborhood clusters. The

Moreover, according to census tracking gentrified areas are in located in populations that have higher educated individuals. As well as the factor of money and the costs of homes, detailing that those living in the area now are well paid. Gentrification has demonstrated a gap in between the nation and its people. It has allowed the factor of money to take over, and leave the people who have originated in the area to be left with nothing. The census official’s state that locals, []. “Washington, D.C., Gentrification Maps and Data.” Governing Magazine: State and Local Government News for America's Leaders, 2018, www.governing.com/gov-data/washington-dc-gentrification-maps-demographic-data.html. Estimates are shown for owner-occupied housing units

When looking at the data I see that the structure of the area is leaving some groups below others and having opportunities that others don’t. Especially when looking at the area of education people of the White race are attaining degrees and a much higher rate than individuals of Hispanic or African American races. This lack of educational attainment is giving the two races that are achieving degrees’ higher chances of advancing further in the social structure. This could be because people of those races not are bringing in the income that the others are. The very reason of education could be the cause of these people not bringing in the income they need to attain the degrees or jobs they wish to hold. Another area of inequality is the issue with housing in the area. Individuals are renting at a greater percent meaning with lack of income they are not able to purchase a house, in turn renting

The metropolitan area I chose to analyze was New Orleans MA. The data collected by five new realities were greatly affected by the devastation that Hurricane Katrina caused. New Orleans was generally not able to conform to the new realities. The population of New Orleans MA dropped a total of 11% and lost more people than any other of the nation’s biggest urban areas. The New Orleans metro area is more diverse in 2012 than in 2000, with a gain of 40,577 Hispanics and 5,582 additional Asian residents. The Latino population in the metro increased to 69 % between 2000 and 2012 - a rate greater than the nation 's 50 % growth. The baby boomers clustered around the 35- to 54-year old age group in 2000 and around the 45- to 64-year old age group in 2012, mainly because of the decline and outmigration of younger populations. . In regards to education, the proportion of adults 25 years and older with less than a high school education declined, leading to a metro-wide decrease from 22

In this article, author Camilie Charles explores the trends of residential segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians and analyzes the factors that contribute to the persisting segregation. Charles argues that racial segregation is the key reason of racial inequality, since segregation hinders the opportunities for social interaction and economic development that are available to minorities living in a particular area. Another key idea that she addresses is that even though race plays a crucial role in neighborhood segregation, socioeconomic factors nowadays have a greater influence on the racial compositions of residential areas. This source overall aims to examine the trends of racial segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians from 1980

By the 1960s many of these urban areas, with the loss of capital, jobs, and so on; began to deteriorate, and property values fell. Currently with the higher costs of property in the suburbs and other communities, there are fewer and fewer opportunities to invest small and gain a big profit; thus, making the once "undesirable" urban properties with their low property values and costs, more "desirable."

The availability of labor has increased while the cost for it has decreased. The workers in the more rural areas spend less money for their living quarters since the rural area is less compact than the metro. With the change in location the type and quality of agricultural land will change.

The lack of housing choices for minorities have meant that the quality of suburbanization that they have achieved is distinctly different than that achieved by more advantage groups. For ethnical minorities the freedom to choose where they wish to live is simply not a reality. For example, in the USA black suburbanization is characterized by expansion of the urban ghetto population to areas just outside city limits African Americans are the most residentially segregated racial or ethnic group in America Regardless of their socioeconomic status, they are forced to persevere without the same equal housing opportunities as white Americans.

on the top and poor on the bottom. The largest class is the middle class.

I read a couple of articles in nj.com recently. In one, a Rutgers-Camden professor of Public Policy published a study that found that more poor people were being concentrated in small to mid-size cities today compared to ten years ago. OK, the economy collapsed and the housing market tanked: poor people always lived in crappy neighborhoods with other poor people, and rich people