preview

Summary Of The Book Of Galatians

Decent Essays

Another biblical principle represented in the founding themes of the U.S. is equal opportunity for all. The book of Galatians erases the line between Jew and Greek, enslaved and free, and male and female. This example applies to culture today. Through a biblical lens, it is obvious that people are not seen as creatures differing from one another, just as two animals of the same species are not seen as different: a bear is a bear, even as different species of bears are recognized. In the same way, all humans are equal, even if they come from different places and acquire different cultural habits. They are born with unalienable civil liberties, among these the right to life, liberty of conscience, and the pursuit of private property. Merely …show more content…

Postmodernists are convinced, and seek to convince all others, that God-given equality of opportunity should equate to equality of outcome. They rally this by advocating for subsidies and government assistance, even when a need is not extreme. Equality of opportunity, however, is presented to all and it was important to the Founders that this right, in particular, be especially protected. The intent of the Founders was not to create a government which entangled and ensnared its citizens. Postmodernists want to believe that the federal government and the Constitution are morally binding, that they are constraining and eliminating the opportunity to live freely and express personal impulses. Neither are truth. Postmodernists rebel against authority because they are bound by the dilemma that nothing is true, nothing can be found to be truth, and truth will never exist. Therefore, they accept each new trend or philosophy, and when the trend does not respect authority and contradicts government, postmodernists will do the same. It is an endless, hopeless cycle, as earlier quoted by …show more content…

In the States, anti-Americanism based on postmodernism was shown in two different ways. One was mentioned above, the rebellion against traditional social culture following the wars, and the other was a disagreement toward the U.S. administration responsible for reassembling America after the war, specifically regarding foreign policy and international relations. Extreme leftists expressed a deep discontentment with the fighting attitude of administrations past. Avoiding, disassembling, and refuting Communist tendencies all over the world intrigued the nation as a whole, except for newly identified extremists. Priorities of the Administrations included rebuilding the economic system of the country following the Great Depression, maintaining hegemony, perfecting homeland security, and completely redefining foreign policy procedures. Differentiating opinions of approaches to the task created the divide in society, therefore leading in the disapproval and revolt. For the postmodern, without any foundation of truth, illegitimate policies abroad, and the disapproval clearly shown in the States for such, was unprecedented. The actions of foreign administrations were right and good for them, because there was no standard. Assuming such only encouraged postmoderns to repudiate the authority of the government and cause rebellion, publicized in revolts, protests,

Get Access