Summary Of The Case Against High School Sports By Amanda Ripley

Sports are so glorified in some areas that schools will put athletics in front of academics. This is exactly what happened the book Friday Night Lights by H.G Bissinger. BIssinger explains that the town of Odessa houses the school Permian where everyone grows up on football. The school and the town give so much praise to the football team that some football players couldn 't care less about class and eventually the teachers don’t care how those players do in class. Mount Vernon is a place where the students are expected to do well in class first and everything else is second. The school has extracurriculars, but knows the school’s main job is to give students an education. Permian and Mount Vernon are opposites on the scale of sports and

As more and more schools shift much of their focus on sports, questions arise to whether or not it's detrimental to the education system. Schools across the nation have a great variation of sports and people of different backgrounds participate and encourage such rigorous activities; however, for many, sports, specifically football, are seen as a causation of inflated heads, budget cuts on academic courses, and baseless dreams. Although football is perceived as a sport with no future tied to it and takes the spotlight from the academic success of a school, the sport promotes personal growth and teaches lessons far beyond a football field that segregating it from schools would result in grave repercussions.

In order for students to have the success they need in school, it is essential for them to on their education before sports. In Amanda Ripley’s article Should Your School Get Rid of Sports? she says, “More than 20 nations have better high school graduation rates” (10). Ripley continues by stating that, Jenny, an 18

The Atlantic article, “High-School Sports Aren’t Killing Academics,” by Daniel H. Bowen and Colin Hitt make a statement on the sports programs in schools. They oppose the thought that participating in sports programs results in a student’s academics suffering, but instead believe sports programs provide academic benefits. Their article targets the article, “The Case Against High-School Sports”, by Amanda Ripley who argues that participation in sports at school cost students’ academic success. The duo constructs their argument around Ripley’s claims and counter her points to strengthen their own. Their argument has a mix of supporting information and points that weakened Bowen and Hitt’s claim. This is due to the methods and evidence they provided which didn’t appear as convincing when trying to persuade readers.

Schools should get rid of sports. Although many people think that sports are relaxing and stress relieving; numerous studies say that for sport players in particular, the lack of time to do work and sleep is crushing them socially, physically, and academically. Therefore, districts should get rid of after school sports because the cost is extreme, this would aid students academically, and they are a

The impact of preserving sports in high schools has been surrounded by much controversy as people suspect that it is the reason behind the poor academic achievement of students. Opponents to high school sports feel that allowing athletics to be a part of schools sidetracks the focus of the student body, which goes completely against the main purpose of schools. Indeed, this assertion is completely true and based upon plentiful evidence. High school sports undoubtedly come at the expense of student academic achievement since they divert the attention of students away from academics and they come with far too many financial costs, both of which incur negative impacts on the academics within a school. The bottomline is that sports are harming the education of students, so a school must make the decision between composing quality sports teams or providing high level academics; both of these choices simply cannot occur simultaneously.

The argument of sports in our high schools will not go away, as kids go to high school and experience the American obsession with high school sports. High schools are supposed to be a place of learning, so we must ask ourselves what are they really? As posed by Ripley, “If sports were not central to the mission of American high schools, then what would be?” (1). I feel that the focus of our high schools should be academics, not how good you are at a sport, because we come to high school for learning and

With a maintained semi-formal tone, Ripley establishes her own credibility as well as providing a sense of order to the work. The manner in which she presents her argument leaves little room for

She also cited one study showing that “about 15 percent experience a brain injury each season” (Ripley, Amanda 8). These injuries can affect the futures of these students involved. By eliminating high school sports, the risk of these possibly fatal injuries would be significantly decreased. This poses an important question that each student athletic needs to ask themselves. “Is a sport worth my future?” The answer to this question is a simple one… NO. Students should not be encouraged to take a gamble with their futures in order to pass a ball or win a trophy, but instead influenced to push themselves to reach their academic

At a high school who is choosing to emphasize mathematics, they still end up pouring more resources into athletics. Other countries dedicate less time and money to school sports, and they outperform United States students. Ripley uses South Korea as an example of a country that prioritizes academics over athletics and outranks the U.S. in comparative test score rankings, “93 percent of South Korean students graduate from high school, compared with just 77 percent of American students -- only 2 percent of whom receive athletic scholarships to college.” South Korea has a higher success rate of students completing high school and a large difference between the U.S. and them is how the approach sports. Although

In America, sport is not only a physical activity, which is used for competition or games but it is also one of the main missions in schools in the US. However, there is a post named "The Case Against High-School Sports" written by Amanda Ripley, which are on a website named The Atlantic. In this post, the main idea of the author is that sports are taking too many times and money in schools and that makes some negative impacts on students, schools, and society. In this post, she claims that she can see the benefits of high-school sports and these sports are becoming likely more important than other academics in schools. However, she has wondered about a trend that participating high-school sports too much could lead to some problems. Although

High school sports have been like a tradition. Many people enjoy it due to the fact that people with interests in sports have a chance to get their hobby as a career. It also adds some miscellaneous benefits. For instance, the article “What in the Name of High School Football” states that, “For example, a multi-year study conducted in Michigan has shown that children who participate in sports have increased educational aspirations, closer ties to school and increased occupational aspirations in youth.” With all those benefits, high school sports appear with a cost. Expanding just this department ignores the further important academics, the majority of sports players boast a shortage on time, and the injury rate of sports can be extreme.

At the end of a long, stressful day at school, you look out to the field where you will soon be with your friends, enjoying the sun on your skin and working off the stress of your cooped up day at school, with your favorite sport, of course. The article “Should Your School Get Rid of School Sports?” has two very strong point of views. Part one, “Yes! It’s Time to Scale Back” by Amanda Ripley argues that we should get rid of school sports. However, part two, “No! Sports Are More Important Than Ever” by Tim O’Shei argues that we should keep school sports. School sports can be expensive, but there are many more benefits and reasons for having sports at school than getting rid of them.

The goal of the National common core standards is to develop students who are career ready and for those going into higher education. It consists of standards and clear understandings` of what students are expected to learn. In order for students to achieve this they not only need to be good in their academics but also have good soft traits like optimism, friendliness and personal attributes that enhance an individual’s interactions. Schools require students to take the core requirements such as english, math, science, and social studies. However, schools tend to overlook an important factor in building a well- rounded person, which is sports. Schools fail to discover the amount of students that joint sports and all the positive ways sports can impact students.

One of the biggest complaints about interscholastic sports is the belief that sports take focus away from academics. Amanda Ripley, journalist and author, elaborates on this very issue. She provides many examples of the ways that sports play a negative role in American schools, and how she believes that they are the reason to blame for the shortcomings of American students: “Sports are embedded in American schools in a way