Summary Of The Main Arguments Of Oppose Position

The death penalty is a controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years. The death penalty was overturned and then reinstated in the United States during the 1970's due to questions concerning its fairness. The death penalty began to be reinstated slowly, but the rate of executions has increased during the 1990's. There are a number of arguments for and against the death penalty. Many death penalty supporters feel that the death penalty reduces crime because it deters people from committing murder if they know that they will receive the death penalty if they are caught. Others in favor of the death penalty feel that even if it doesn't deter others from committing crimes, it will eliminate

As a result, those who support executions think it can be effective against violent crimes. Also, the author's thesis states whether televising capital punishment should be televised. It's stirring up a debate between the pro-execution and con-execution in the U.S. Those who are pro-executions believe that criminals deserve to be executed and televised due to their crime. However, those who are con-executions believe it’s horrific and inhumane to be televised. They think it’s unnecessary and uncivilized to televise it because of their crime. All in all, the pro-execution and con-execution can’t come to an agreement and continue to stir up a debate. Furthermore, Zachery Shemtob is responding to individuals who see televising executions as barbaric. Even though executions can be barbaric it has potential in decreasing crime rates if it was televised. The author the let the readers to acknowledge more about executions by using his expertise in the criminal justice field. Zachery tries to convince his audience that capital punishment should be televised by using different types of evidence such as examples, and

The use of the death penalty has brought peace of mind to our citizens. Though through the mid nineteen sixties until the early nineteen eighties only about six death penalties actually took effect. When the number of executions dropped, the murder rate rose from 5.6 per 100,000 people to 10.2 which is almost double the murder rate. A society cannot live in fear but needs to live in reassurance and protection. As of nineteen ninety-nine, the murder rate dropped dramatically to 5.7 because the execution rate increased to 47 executions. Pearce, Matt. "Counterpoint: Defending The Death Penalty." Points Of View: Death Penalty (2014): 6. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 23 Sept. 2014. This demonstrates the deterrent effect capital punishment has on society. The result is deterrence shows if one kills then one will be punished for their actions and crime.

That means innocent people are murdered. Studies have shown that the evidence used to convict people is often faulty. Eyewitness testimony is used in lots of murder convictions without any physical evidence. It has led to many misidentifications. 266 prisoners have been exonerated by DNA evidence, three-fourths have been wrongfully convicted based on mistaken eyewitness identification. Decades of life are stolen from people on death row. Anthony Ray Hinton figured he had one or two years until he was executed. They made him wait 30 years for something he didn’t do. The people wait on death row for decades for something they didn’t do. Lots of people don’t think the death penalty is

Many states have been executing fewer people in the past decade and some states like Maryland and the District of Columbia have abolished capital punishment altogether. Many people shake and are repulsed by the live executions they see on television from the Middle East. From all the Western Countries, the United States is the only country that still upholds the death penalty. Even though the death penalty is legal in most states, just a few of them do still carry out executions. Reason for this could be that Americans are somehow okay with the idea of the states using the lethal injection as the best way to put a sick human being to endless sleep. Botched executions have also been exposed as a large problem seemingly unknown to the American public. The drugs that have been used for the lethal injections also seem to be experimental, untested and are sometimes proving to be ineffective at killing prisoners without some form of excruciating pain. Just because the prison is using pharmaceutical drugs does not necessarily mean that this is a painless process. Richard Dieter, Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center, says sceptism of lethal injection is “not driven by sympathy for the defendants, who committed terrible crimes,” but rather, “(the public) doesn’t want to hear gruesome facts,” such as prisoners writhing in agony while strapped to a gurney as their loved one’s watch. When the procedure is botched, it is anything but

Does the Death penalty still serve the fundamental purpose that was originally proposed, and if no, is there another way? Overall the argument on the use of death penalty can go either way. The real issue is defining the gray areas in constitutionality of the death penalty process and actually seeing if it serves as an effective benefit for society. This research essay will dig into what the death penalty actually means, the history context, the use of the precedents, views on both sides, and come to decide what we can do to make the death penalty more

The death penalty has many advantages and disadvantages and the criminal justice system is constantly fighting the battle to keep it alive and well.

For years there has been may controversies on capital punishment but, numbers have dropped significantly throughout the years. Based on the Bureau of Justice Statistics in the year of 1999 there was a total of 295 death sentences in the United States and, last year 2015 the number was 49. Many beliefs of this drop is due to crime rate decreased, or an increase in jail cells. So if the death penalty has decreased this could be a sign that the system is working and the crime is becoming less severe to society ,but being that there is no cause of how it dropped and, the other possibility is that there could be an increase in jail cells and, it these prisons reach their maximum the outcome could result to the increase of death penalty.

The death penalty is probably in the top ten of the most controversial laws in the United States. It is controversial religiously and politically, but people have those different views. Right now it is legal to execute someone after they have gone through their court case with lethal injection, electrocution, gas chamber, hanging and firing squad. Only after going through the court of law and being proven guilty may these terms apply. If the prosecution is just, then there should be no problem with the execution.

Proponents argue that it will “curb crime” or serve as a form of “societal control”. Though this may be true to a certain degree, the argument over whether it is an effective crime control measure is debatable with both sides providing ample evidence to support their positions. However, I submit that in today’s (U.S.) society, public execution will be no more than a media spectacle and point to which our society will become more divided. The last true public execution was 80 years ago (1936) in Owensboro, KY with the hanging of Rainey Bethea (Murrman, 2014). The Bethea execution became such a “media

For years now the Americans have debated over the issue of capital punishment.   Many people believe that it no longer serves out its intended purpose of deterring crime.  Others believe that the death penalty is an inhumane act of violence and that it should be banished from the justice system all together.  The thought of playing God also is another aspect of the situation.  Despite these allegations however, the facts still remain.  The death penalty deters crime, stops repeat offenders, and gives Americans a real sense that justice has been served, and should therefore remain legal and in practice.

Innocent people are put down unfairly simply because authorities were unable to accurately do their jobs and wrongly accused a person of doing something they didn’t do. As said by Joe Messerli “The sad thing about this, according to those who are opposed is that innocence is proven after the execution has been carried out” meaning that a side from it being a complete injustice to those innocent people, we are still in many ways humiliating them more and as well as being extremely disrespectful by letting unknown people go in and watch how they take their last breaths (Messerli, Joe. "List of 10 Biggest Death Penalty Pros and Cons."). Today’s Execution without an audience would not be meaningless simply because those who die are not there to entertain those present watching, they are their either to be put down for committing no such crime or committing a grave crime. Many people may feel the need to be present for the execution because they feel as if though their presence makes it that much more of a pain to the prisoner but in the end the only one harmed is them because we allow ourselves to harvest hatred. As stated in the article “Since 1973, over 140 people have been released from death rows in 26 states because of innocence” this shows that through the use of the death penalty we ultimately risk the lives of

Putting people to death, judged to have committed certain extremely heinous crimes, is a practice that’s been around for along time. In the later half of the twentieth century, it has become a controversial issue. As a supporter of the death penalty, I consider this to be a good thing for my country and its citizens. Capital punishment deters crime. Statistics prove consisted application of the death penalty deter crime. No executed murdered has ever killed again. For many years, Criminologists have thought to believe the death penalty has no affect as deterrence to homicides. From 1972-1976, a suspension was place on capital punishment. The United States had 9,140 murders in 1960 where 56 people were executed. Nine years

When something changes in our life time it does make a difference in our lives, the death penalty will change our way of living; criminals will need to be smart and think twice. I personally think that if someone should be convicted for any crime to be put to death, the crime should for murders, abuse and for any rapes to harm another person for life. I believe that the death penalty should be back but not used a lot or limited so Britain can lower any wrongly convicted and get the proper punishment for murderers who have killed. The death penalty is a cruel ting I agree with that but not for murders they deserve it no questions needed even though the victim of any murder could of had an even horrible death than the murderer who could be convicted of murder. This will act as a major deterrent, it will stop criminals killing to get a better life in jail than their

Capital punishment has been around for many years as a way of executing criminals. Despite what most believe, capital punishment is not functional in the American society. Defenders of the death penalty often claim that the execution of criminals will teach others not to do bad, initially decreasing crime rates. Unfortunately, statistics prove that thought to be wrong. Capital punishment also has great flaws. For example, many innocent people have been put to death because of capital punishment. There also is no consistency. Two of the same crimes can be convicted in two different states and the consequences with be different for both offenders. The death penalty shows to be