Silencing and isolating people has always been, andSilencing and isolating people has always been, and still continues to be a way to conserve normalities in a society. It minimizes the fear that an outsider may change the typical mindset and values a person is brought up to have within a society. In the short story “Caged” by an unknown author, the elders of the village imprisoned Charity for breaking the rules of the village in hopes that the other women of the village could learn from her mistakes and would not follow her footsteps. Charity’s imprisonment failed to be the example that the elder’s were aiming towards. The elders believed that by isolating Charity in a fence away but in view of the other village women would be a lesson …show more content…
With time, the women started to acknowledge Charity less and less to the point that she was merely a woman behind a fence. They no longer considered the reasons of her being in that fence or the punishments that came with Charity breaking the village rules.
For Constance, unlike the other women, it does not take her time to overlook the men’s reasons and lessons for segregating Charity. It was against the elder’s rules for anyone to help Charity and Charity was aware of that as well- “She knew her friend was risking grave punishment just by talking to her” (5). Not only did Constance overlook it from the beginning, but she also continued to secretly provide necessities for Charity and accompany her at times.
The way that Charity is isolated in “Caged” symbolizes how females are silenced in the modern world today so that their ideas do not overpower the standard way of life, often involving male dominance. A lot of the time, it seems as if the isolating and silencing has been successful but that is not the case for many circumstances. As women are silenced, it often leads to ignorance from those that oppose feminism, as shown by both the men and the women in the short story. From Constance, being someone who supports Charity, there is rebellion. This is shown in the outside world as those are support feminism, where there is also rebellion. Ignorance and rebellion are not a sign of success, but are in fact a sign of failure as it also disrupts social norms.
In "Oppression" by Marilyn Frye, Frye discussed how a bird cage symbolizes the systematic oppression of women. Frye explains that if you look at a single wire in a bird cage you cannot understand why the bird, is unable to simply fly around the wire and be free. But, when you step back and look at the cage as a whole system of interlocking wires you realize that the bird has no chance of escaping because of all the barriers put in their way (Frye). This is exactly the same case for women. When somebody tries to see the oppression of women. they look only at one problem women face, refusing to step back and see there is no one cause for their oppression. If instead they looked at all the barriers women face at once, they would finally see that women have no way of escaping oppression without continuous efforts of every person involved in the oppression, including the woman being oppressed and the sexist men doing the oppressing.
In Edith Wharton’s book Summer the main character Charity Royall is the daughter of the most influential man in town and yet she doesn’t want anything more than to escape from her small town of North Dormer and her lonely father figure that inhabits it. Mr. Royall took her down from the Mountain when she was a child and has raised her as his own since she was young, but after the death of his wife he has resorted to drinking to heal his loneliness, and later in his weakened state turns to Charity to cure his loneliness. Though his first proposal could be seen as “disgusting” and “incest” in that he tries to enter Charity’s room while he is drunk, when he later asks her to marry him for the third time, he is clear headed and believes this is the best option for Charity. At first Charity is disgusted by herself for giving in to Mr. Royall’s advances, after a silent agreement between her and Mr. Royall in which she realizes he has no intention of making her do anything she doesn’t want to do, she realizes that this is the best outcome for her and accepts her fate.
The women of the story are not treated with the respect, which reflects their social standings. The first image of the women that the reader gets is a typical housewife. They are imaged as “wearing faded house dresses and
Prisons socially isolate criminals to deter interference with the rights and freedoms of other members of the society. Under this isolation, the criminals are given another chance to reform their mistakes and come back form where they have come from and they argue that reforming the sentencing system will increase the number of criminals in the society
Janie and her grandmother represent a culture of women that were stereotyped into a specific gender role, putting them as the last class in society. They received no compensation or respect for their services. Their work specifically benefited only those they worked for, and supported. Through compromising themselves in this way these women were subjected to even more maltreatment.
Williams came out of the cabin. Mr. Williams was walking toward Charity, holding something out to her. It was a smaller book; he called it a journal. This one was blank. He told her to write things she felt were important in it and then smiled as though he was handing her the world. Although Charity did not know it right then, he was.
Skip Hollandsworth candidly explores the subjects of juvenile crime and sentencing in the electronic long form newspaper article, “The Prisoner”. The purpose of the essay is to inform the reader about juvenile sentencing and to persuade the audience that there are clear problems with aspects of the U.S. prison system. The article is easily accessible to a large audience because it is online. Hollandsworth takes into account that his audience, mostly consisting of Texas Monthly readers, may already have pre-established notions about the topic, so he considers other sides while still supporting his argument. Edwin Debrow, a preteen member of the Crips, committed a murder when he was 12-years old and received a 27-year sentence through the
It always shows that the poor have a more honest-to-goodness side than the rich. Why? Probably because they’ve been through the rough patch and understand the concept of karma and virtue. They become a better person! A living example of this would be Jeannette Walls. After living with her parents and their lax idea of being poor, she learned that wasn’t the right way to live; Walls first realized this in Welsh when her mother refused to get up for work. She was tired of Rose Mary’s childish behavior and scolded her for it, which Rose Mary took offensively and threatened to tell her father; Rex found out, warned Walls to watch her mouth, and when she refused to apologize, he spanked her, something that’s never been done before. It dawned on her then on how ignorant her parents were; as a result, Jeannette took up a job at a local jewelry store to support her family, since neither of her parents were willing to. This proves how poverty can change a person morally as you can see that due to their living condition, Walls had to find a job. She could have left the family and lived out on her own, but ultimately, she decided to play out the virtue, charity, against the sin, Selfishness. This wasn’t her only time using virtuous powers;
Madam 's husband and business Lawyer convinced her to donate money to the community in order to bring positive attention to her business. This idea worked, but also grew and gave her many more opportunities to give to her community. Madam helped her poor neighbors in Indianapolis by supporting them on rent and groceries, gave coins to children in return for running her errands, and spoke to women about education and bettering themselves. Through her actions and large donations to local organizations, she touched many peoples lives and became a well established and thought of member of the Indianapolis community.
Prisoner without a Name, Cell without a number is a melancholy novel that expresses Argentina’s terrorist state. Jacob Timerman, a well respected man of Argentina, an editor of a well know Argentinian paper, La Opinion, tells the audience his story of the terrorist state of Argentina from 1967-1978. His gripping novel both describes his personal experience being kidnapped by terrorist, while he tells us about the condition of the terrorist state of Argentina. His book is important because it tells a first hand account of the fear, the distrust, and the mere insanity of conditions in the country of Argentina during its darkest time.
Does solitary confinement cause severe mental issues? Are the mentally ill allowed to be put in solitary confinement? How bad can the mental issues possibly get if you don’t have a mental issue before being put in solitary confinement? All of these are questions some people ask, but really don’t care enough to dig deeper. What if your loved one or even you were to be put in solitary confinement? Wouldn’t you want to know what it was, wouldn’t you want to know what the affects of this punishment are?
Since the early 1800s, the United States has relied on a method of punishment barely known to any other country, solitary confinement (Cole). Despite this method once being thought of as the breakthrough in the prison system, history has proved differently. Solitary confinement was once used in a short period of time to fix a prisoners behavior, but is now used as a long term method that shows to prove absolutely nothing. Spending 22-24 hours a day in a small room containing practically nothing has proved to fix nothing in a person except further insanity. One cannot rid himself of insanity in a room that causes them to go insane. Solitary confinement is a flawed and unnecessary method of punishment that should be prohibited in the prison
It was in a brainstorming situation that I discovered the topic of discussion I wanted to hear a convincing opposition against. I knew that choosing something more controversial would garner a greater opposition, but at the same time, I wanted to avoid topics that seemed almost too commonplace in assignments like this. With that in mind, I decided to hear out the opposition against my view of the inhumanity of solitary confinement. The person with whom I discussed, who will be referred to as Person X for the purposes of this write-up, believed that in certain situations, solitary confinement was a just punishment. We had this discussion waiting for our Microbiology class to begin. Bringing up random topics of discussion is not something unusual within the scope of my character, and so rather than wait for an opportunity that would not present itself, I simply asked Person X for his/her opinion on solitary confinement as a justified punishment for convicted criminals. To give the discussion some direction and so that I could better understand Person X’s point of view I asked some questions. The two most important I found being: “Why do you feel that it’s okay to punish people like that in some cases but not in others?” and “How long is too long?”. I found these questions particularly helpful in understanding Person X’s position because I noticed that he/she didn’t completely agree with either one side. He/she was intent on making a point based on conditionality. Although I
When she sees that it is her friend Charlotte in this heart breaking situation, she says: “gracious heaven is this possible? And bursting into tears, she reclined the burning head of Charlotte on her own bosom; and folding her arms about her, wept over in silence” [125]. In this passage, Mrs. Beauchamp proves how sentimental and good she could be because not only does she have a sick child at home, but she finds the time to actually care about others and because she actually cries for Charlotte, a person who is not even her relative. She is a sentimental person because she is the only one that in the beginning offered Charlotte her friendship and because thanks to her, Charlotte’s father is able to see Charlotte one last time and forgive her. In many cases, this might be confused with weakness but it is not weakness. It is the ability to feel others pain as your own, it is the ability to care for others as you would your own relative; it is being a moral person and only through the act of sensibility can this be shown. In a situation like this, an immoral person might have only thought about their own problems and not the problems of others.
Storytelling helps other people to emotionally connect themselves to the author so that they know they are not the only ones who are experiencing a painful or exciting experience, and are able to share the same emotions. It often helps other people to know what they should do in order to get over it when it comes to a painful experience. Maya Angelou’s I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings explores the life of Maya Angelou and the struggles she has been throughout her childhood to her adulthood. Richard Wagemese’s Indian Horse explores the life of Saul Indian Horse and the struggles he has been through after departing from his family. The power of storytelling can unfold questions which ask the audience of how and why are the events are unfold the