Summary Of ' Total ' Dynamics Of Leadership '

Leadership is generally known as the action of leading people which can be interpreted a multitude of ways. With different styles and theories of leadership practiced daily, each comes with its own set of challenges. The one constant every leader needs to be prepared for is change due to a multitude of internal and external factors that impact businesses daily. When leaders and mid- to lower level employees in healthcare organizations were asked “What 's the one word that best characterizes the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on the U.S. healthcare delivery system," most will answer "Change (Delmatoff )”. Without adapting to these changes, all employees as well as the companies they work for

The definition of "leadership" as defined in Wikipedia means "the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others."

What Leadership Means Leadership is 'the behaviour of an individual when he is directing the activities of a group towards a shared goal'. (Hemphill and Coons, 1957, p.7) A leader is interpreted as someone who sets direction in an effort and influences people to follow that direction. How they set that direction and influence people depends on a variety of factors.

Leadership is a term that cannot be defined or simplified with a standard definition (Bethel, 2011). The term’s complexity is a phenomenon, as it carries a different meaning for each person. During the

There are many definitions of leadership. Chemers (1997) describes it as: "A process of social influence in which one person can enlist the support of others in the accomplishment of a common task or aim"

My conformed Myers-Briggs Indicator Type was ENFJ. As a leader I think I tend to be

Leadership is one of social science’s most examined phenomena. The scru¬tiny afforded to leadership is not

Leadership: Carol continues to promote teamwork within the section to encourage her peers to participate in social events to boost morale. She continues gaining respect of others through her own actions and attitude.

Leadership is defined in many different ways by many different academics and professionals. A few words that resonate with the meaning include management, control, guidance, headship, direction and governance. My basic definition for the word describes it as a technique used to manage and guide individuals or groups of individuals in a specific direction to achieve a common goal. However this is a bit too basic for my liking. While conducting the research for this manifesto I found two definitions that I thought were more interesting and quite charming. Tom Landry defines leadership as “getting someone to do what they don’t want to do, to achieve what they want to achieve” (Murphy, 2010). Alternatively Otto Scharmer stated, “at its core, leadership is about shaping and shifting how individuals and groups attend and subsequently respond to a situation” (Scharmer, 2007).

The results suggest that my four dominant leadership types are the following – extrovert, sensor, feeler, and judger. The two most prominent dominant types (with a score of 5) are extrovert and feeler. I believe the results reflect who I am. I’m very outgoing, a people’s person, and talkative. I’m also a very emotional person. I show my emotions on my face and I am sensitive to what others think of me.

Leadership and I, we’ve brushed shoulders a lot. There are the times I’ve confronted it, like the time I took the reigns on a School Club Project, and the times I’ve tried to avoid it, much like the times I have tried, to no avail, to gain experience and “power” whilst avoiding it. And then there are times I have tried to understand it with Google searches, Bing searches, Chrome searches, Wikepedia searches, Dictionary searches, and even Leader inquiries. The conclusion I had reached: there was no definition. Sure, there are the Google, Bing, Chrome, Wikepedia, and Leader definitions, but these characteristics don’t apply to everyone. In order to understand Leadership, you have to understand a Leader. To understand a Leader, you have to

Traditional leadership models tend to portray leader as to be all the things to all the people. To command and to control and to orchestrate the actions of others at all the levels of organization. To have the intellectual capacity to make sense of remarkably complex issues while at the same time have creative powers to paint the future that spawns everyone’s enthusiasm.

According to Sharma & Jain (2013), “Leadership is a process by which a person influences others to accomplish the objective and directs the organization in a way that makes it more cohesive and purposeful” (Para 5, pp. 310).

¡§LEADERSHIP IS A DYNAMIC RELATIONSHIP BASED ON MUTUAL INFLUENCE AND COMMON PURPOSE BETWEEN LEADERS AND COLLABORATORS IN WHICH BOTH ARE MOVED TO HIGHER LEVELS OF MOTIVATION AND MORAL DEVELOPMENT AS THEY AFFECT REAL, INTENDED CHANGE.¡¨

Taking a deep further look at the definition, we can consider Leadership as ‘the process of influencing an organized group’, engaging them to maximize group effectiveness, ‘towards the accomplishment of a goal’. (Hughes, Ginnet & Curphy 2015, p. 5)