Summary Of Wilson's Case

In the Ferguson, Missouri case involving a white police officer (Darren Wilson) shooting an unarmed African American teenager (Michael Brown), the worldwide media immediately claimed that the officer shot Michael Brown for no reason besides the color of his skin. Many rumors and assumptions spread like wildfire after white police officer Darren Wilson was found innocent by a judge of having purpose to shoot Brown.

The heated issue of police brutality and police officers violating civil rights has extensively covered media headlines for several years. Hundreds of people are killed every year by police officers, and many of these cases bring up issues of police brutality. More often than not, it is usually a white police officer and an african american offender encounter that sparks media attention. The shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri is just one of these cases that has caused a major divide in the United States. Michael Brown was fatally shot by Officer Wilson after an unfriendly encounter in the streets. Those who believe that Officer Wilson made the right decision in shooting Michael Brown, point to the fact that the grand jury chose not to indict him. Although Darren WIlson was not charged after the shooting of unarmed Michael Brown, some people believe that his actions were unlawful and he should have received some sort of punishment for his wrongdoing. Acknowledging all of the facts of the investigation, Officer Wilson did not act properly in the circumstances of the time.

Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager, was shot and killed on August 2014, by Darren Wilson, a white police officer, in Ferguson, Mo. Brown, an 18-year-old African-American was fatally shot and killed in the street shortly after robbing a convenience store. The disputed circumstances of the shooting of the unarmed young man sparked existing tensions in the majority-black community and law enforcements in Ferguson, Mo. The event received considerable attention in the U.S. and elsewhere, attracted protesters from outside the region, and generated a powerful debate about the relationship between law enforcement and African Americans and the police use of excessive force. The shooting prompted protests that shaken the area for weeks. The announcement of the grand jury that they decided not to indict Mr. Wilson set off another wave of protests. Many police officers have defended Wilson, pointing out that officers patrolling violent neighborhoods risk their lives, while demonstrators saw the case in terms of racism and police brutality. However, Brown’s killing and the following events in Ferguson became a national controversy touching on much larger national issues of race, justice, and police brutality. While the specifics of the Brown shooting involved is not clear, the situation would have been dramatically different had Wilson worn body camera which would have recorded the actual event. With new body camera technology

In the summer of 2014, 18-year-old Michael Brown was fatally shot by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson. After the shooting, there had been conflicting reports by police and eyewitnesses about what exactly happened. Officer Wilson insist Brown was confrontational throughout the encounter, while eyewitnesses say Brown has his hands up trying to surrender before he was shot and killed. Following the Grand jury’s decision not to indict officer Wilson over the shooting of Michael Brown and similar cases of officer-involved shootings and brutality such as the death of Eric Garden in Staten Island, New York, politicians, family advocates, civil rights activists, and law enforcement officials have called for police across the country to adopt the use of body-worm cameras. Although there are many who feel police body cameras present a challenge to privacy and safety issues for both cops and civilians, by recording police-citizen encounters, it increases transparency and accountability of officers and the video recorded by body cams protect any false accusations, police misconduct, officials can get clear evidence of what happened instead of relying on hearsay.

On August 9, 2014 Officer Darren Wilson with the Ferguson Missouri Police Department was on his way to a reported strong-arm robbery at a local convenience store in the city. While on his way, he observed two African-American males walking in the middle of the roadway (#1). Officer Wilson realized the pair matched the description given of the suspects from the robbery call in which he had been dispatched. While still in his patrol vehicle, Officer Wilson drove up to the males, and began speaking with Michael Brown. Officer Wilson told Brown to not walk in the lanes of traffic (#1).

During the past couple months a controversial case was brought to the grand jury in Ferguson. The jury decided to not indict Officer Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown. This major decision caused uprising, riots, protests, and lootings in the town of Ferguson. Many protesters feel this is a race issue, when clearly it is not. The grand jury did the right thing to not indict Officer Darren Wilson in the killing of Michael Brown. Michael Brown was guilty because he assaulted a police officer, the actions Michael Brown took apart in, and

To begin the police has caused many unnecessary deaths throughout the United States. More than 920 people have been killed by the police in 2015 (“5 Facts about Police Brutality in the United States That Will Shock You”). In Ferguson, Missouri 18 year old Michael Brown was shot and killed by police officer Darren Wilson. Mr. Johnson a witness at the scene, says that his friend was shot once from behind and then turned to face the police officer while raising his arms in the air. According to Mr Johnson, the officer fired several more shots at Mr. Brown before he fell to the ground (“Ferguson protests:What we know about Michael Brown 's last minutes”). Although Mr. Brown was fleeing from the officer, there was no need for the officer to shoot Brown.

“When you need to make a decision, don’t let your emotions vote.”(Quote) In every published article, the author will use several literary devices or fallacies to present perspectives of events like the Michael Brown Case in order for the audience to persuade them to feel a certain way. Consequently, the audience can be influenced by these devices and may unfortunately ensue to the perpetuation of misinformation due to their ignorance of the whole picture.Within the article, Darren wilson explains why he killed Michael Brown, written by Terrence McCoy from The Washington post, it displays quotes that favors Wilson’s story in an innocent and pitiful tone to justify his actions by placing the blame on Brown. It regards Brown as the one who started the fight which led to the shot that Wilson fired and brought

An entire town, an entire nation, an entire world was left to speculate. Who was right? Who was wrong? Was the officer threatened? Was Michael Brown wrongfully attacked from the beginning? Had Officer Wilson been wearing a body camera or had he deployed a dashboard camera, we would then have the beginning of the story, as well as the tragic end.

Citizens began to say that Officer Darren Wilson should have pepper sprayed the victim, tased him, or called for back up. All of those alternatives look good on paper, but in the moment when you are being beaten to what could have been death, you have to think either I am going to let this man beat me to death or I am going to go home to my family. The jury in this case decided not to indict Mr. Wilson, but since the incident, he has had a difficult finding another job being a police officer.

Witnesses at the crime scene said both that Brown had charged the Wilson in the car, and also said that Brown was never at all in the car. Witnesses described Browns movements in both two different ways again. The first way was that Brown charged Officer Wilson, and that was when Officer Wilson shot at him. The other way that was described was Brown did not charge at all and at one point had his hands in the air. The reason I bring up this case is because if Officer Wilson would have been wearing a body mounted camera, the jury would have been able to see what Browns movements were and also if Brown did indeed attack Wilson in the officer 's car. This evidence may or may not have changed the outcome of the case, and could have saved a young mans life.

Officer Wilson shot Brown and did not get prosecuted by the law. The author Jake Halpern describes how everything happened due to all of the people who saw this and all said the same thing. There were actually many people who saw it all some tried to get in and to help brown, but the officers would not let anyone get near that crime scene. The point of view from different citizens were all similar not any of them like what they saw. “I was bottled up, it was too hot to be in a situation like this.” What officer Wilson meant by this is that he was already dealing with so much that exact day and this chase was not meant to happen all a regular officer wanted to do was to arrest the victim for stealing. Officer Wilson was having a difficulty trying to arrest brown as the chase begun all he could do was to shoot

The shooting of African American teenager Michael Brown by white officer Darren Wilson has been a hot topic of debate. Those in support of Michael Brown believe that Darren Wilson racially profiled Brown and that the shooting would have never occurred had Brown been white. Those in support of Darren Wilson state that he acted in self-defense. This argument has more evidence supporting it than the argument that Brown was racially profiled.

On a Saturday night in Ferguson, Missouri a 18-year-old named Michael Brown was walking home from stealing from the store and police officer named darren wilson was sent the description of michael brown and Dorian Johnson. Wilson backed up his police car in front of them to block them off their path then a confrontation happened between Brown and Wilson struggling through the window of the police vehicle. Then, Brown walked away from the car but turned around to face to car and walked back toward it. As he approached the car again Wilson shot at Brown several different times almost all in the front of him. Wilson shot twelve times at Brown and the last shot was most likely was the fatal shot. Brown was unarmed. There had been disputes about whether or not brown was reaching for wilson 's gun while the altercations happened through the car door window and the direction of brown was facing when he was shot. After months of riots in Ferguson over Brown’s seemingly unfair death, Officer Wilson was not indicted by a grand jury. This decision only cause more uproar and a national conversation about police brutality and racism. If Wilson had been wearing a body camera, all of this hurt, distrust and chaos could have avoided. Even though some people believe that camera are ineffective, police officers should wear body cameras while on duty because it creates a safer environment, it 's safer for the police officers and it gives evidence to hold

In Ferguson, Missouri a 18 years old black teenager named was Michael Brown was shot and killed by a police officer. On August 9, 2014 Michael Brown and his friend Dorian Johnson left Ferguson market and liquor after stealing some cigarillos. As they were walking down the street, a police officer, Darren Wilson, who was by himself tell the boys to walk to the sidewalk. Mr. Wilson had a got a description of the suspect from the liquor store owner, and he taught Michael fits the description perfectly. He calls for backup and puts his car in the middle of the street to block the traffic. In a couple second an encounter between the police officers and Michale causes the Johnson to shoot two times at Michael.The first shot his michael’s thumb