Summary: Should Government Regulate Businesses With Respect To Privacy Online

I believe that the government should have the powers to monitor internet content but that people should be aware that it is occurring. If the government is aware of some sort of threat in which they will need to monitor the internet in order to help neutralize the threat. But, in a situation where this is happening, they should

Living in the twenty first century we are all exposed to things we wish we were not or things our parents wish we had not been exposed to. Things like porn, cyberbullying, and invasion of privacy are a very real thing of today even more than it has been in the past years because our society is very technology based and as consumers we can get our hands on anything we desire as long as we have a connection to the internet. Does this mean that the federal government should be allowed to regulate information on the internet?

The internet makes people to be more dependency. It makes people to observe more information, and to be tended to find information. People relay more in finding information in the internet today. Furthermore, people are physically involved as they try to think and find information from the internet. The internet may have small effect on people, but still it helps people.

As years go by and our technology progresses we become increasingly more reliant on Internet. These new developments make it easier for the government to access our personal online activities. The government is able to see and control every detail of what we do online. They are able to see what we do, where we go, and whom we talk to. The government is able to track any emails we receive or send out along with any social media activity that takes place. This type of government involvement is very debated, the most common defense heard is that the government is trying to prevent bombing threats and that this is a way in which they gain knowledge about someone who may be making a bomb. Also with the recent events going on it is also a way for them to know if citizens have communicated or worked with Isis. Some involvement by government is understandable and reasonable, however the length at which they are going to obtain this information and evidence has become increasingly disrespectful. It is one thing for the government to look through personal information, but for companies such as, Google to send out that personal information to other companies that we know nothing about is another way in which we, as citizens, lose even more control. The government not only threatens our Internet privacy, but also “chills free speech and free

The internet is a vast global interconnected network enabling numerous people to access countless information and communicate with others miles away. When browsing the web nowadays, however, many forget what’s really happening behind the scenes. Internet cookies and complex algorithms are being downloaded behind your back allowing big brand companies and even the federal government to track what the people are doing. This is a major violation to our right to privacy which is implied in the Constitution.On the other hand, it’s understandable for the government to have a substantial amount of surveillance of the internet to monitor terrorists and people seeking to cause harm, but the extent the US government controls over the web is absurdly large and unnecessary. Overall, surveillance and order must be maintained throughout the internet to deter fanatics intending to cause harm, but the United States government have increased their range so wide it has

" The United States government has a responsibility to ensure that every American has access to an internet that has a freedom of information. The internet has become a necessity in our everyday lives. School age Americans use the internet for research projects and even to submit homework. A vast majority of working-age Americans use the internet for the jobs or are involved in producing the inputs necessary to advance technology and keeping the current technology infrastructure working. The U.S. government has a limited duty in monitoring internet content. The government should have the ability to protect Americans from cyber acts and personal information theft. Currently the Federal Trade Commission has the power to regulate the internet

Online privacy is a major problem facing many people today. The major problem is that our privacy is being invaded and being used for other personal needs. Not only that but it is harming you in more ways than you know. For example it could affect your social security, lost job opportunities, and denial of insurance.

The modern day has evolved to one being heavily influenced by social media, a powerful platform for the public. As a result of that, it has become a platform for people to promote progressive ideas for society, as well has become a tool to promote hate. The United States government has a duty to regulate the internet as it potentially could be a tool for illegal activity and has proven to be a harmful tool if used maliciously, but to what extent is too much regulation? The duty of the US government to regulate the internet is one to ensure safety, but not one to violate the civil liberties and rights the country was originally built on.

" In my opinion, the United States government should have a minimal duty to monitor internet content. Also, I believe the state and local governments in particular should not have any duty to monitor what is happening on the internet. The United States government should have minimal duty to monitor the internet because it is an invasion of privacy, restricts citizens’ freedom, and should only be needed in extreme cases. Knowing that the government could see everything that I do on the internet including my text messages, emails, and listening to my phone calls leaves me with a very unsettling feeling. Back in April, President Donald Trump signed a bill that releases internet service providers from having to protect consumer data.

The Internet is used by millions everyday. With so many people using one open platform, a question arises. Should the government regulate or leave it to the people? Both sides are supported by millions. The answer is simple, the Internet should be regulated due to user security, net neutrality, and data collecting.

How involved should the Government be when it comes to regulation of the Internet? There are many different issues regarding internet regulation. Should Internet users be responsible for controlling how they use the Internet? Since the internet has been introduced to Americans there have been many debates on how involved the Government should be in regulating topics such as violent games, gambling, and sexual content.

The government has always been concerned with issues of national security. They have, in the past, kept information secret even from the American people because of perceived threat to the safety of the citizenry. With the advent of the internet and the massive amounts of information that can be found with a click of a few buttons, the issue has become whether or not this technology poses a severe threat to American security. At the same time, for some people the issue has been about free speech and the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. All these factors need to be taken into account when ultimately deciding a perspective on the issue of regulation of the internet. It is my contention that the government only needs to regulate the internet in cases where there might be a danger to national security or in terms of criminal behavior such as using the internet to share or download child pornography. If these two things are not clear and present, then the government should not be involved but should allow websites to continue without interference.

The effects of the internet on me and this society have been rapidly changing. Did you know that approximately 3.2 billion people use the internet, about 200 billion emails and 3 million google searches would have to wait if the internet was turned off for one day. Let me tell you about something that happened when i was little, it might be off topic a little but when i was little i was born backwards, meaning i came out legs first. My hips were out of place and until i was about 2. My dad is always on the internet and loved taking pictures of his “Little princess”, the pictures can still be found on facebook along with a lot of other things from my family memories. That was when i started wanting to get on the internet, i asked for a facebook and they said no, being a rebel i made one anyways just to play the games on it. The internet can have positive and negative things about it for younger and older people, for example the internet engines are one of the best information givers out there, they bring almost everything and anything to a lot of internet users that lange from all over the world. The internet can provide ways to communicate with family and friends from a long distance, and even meet new people. Bad things about it is people sharing and storing illegal information on the internet, much like the dark web. The addiction to the internet and the online network can be disturbing a person's way of living and professional activity.

     The most important affect the internet bestowed, or e-shopping as we like to call it, is its affect on the economy. Now is the future, and our retailing process needs a major change, as Birch,

Technology is influencing just about every part of our lives. On account of the Internet, basically anything you yearning could be conveyed to your entryway in a matter of days. Individual data is more open over the Internet too - you can find everything from a departed cousin to the enlisted sex wrongdoers in your neighborhood. You can even exchange stocks or document charges on the web. Folks don't have to lose slumber sitting tight for their adolescent girl to return - they can simply call her phone, or send an unpretentious content, to examination.