Summary : ' Tarea Semana 1 Globalizacion '

For some people, globalization is so feared it is synonymous with world destruction. In the end, for all we know, maybe this will be proven before it is over. In reality however, there are many good things that have resulted from globalization(1, Premise). Let’s for a moment focus on the economy, even though there are many other advantages that have been brought forward that will also be discussed. Many Americans do not appreciate how efficient our markets are, in this case efficiency in reference to supply and demand is number one. These efficient markets allow economies to grow. As many have learned in a global world, when one economy grows, it spurs growth in all the other economies

Globalization’s impact on sustainable prosperity is examined in the source. It does this by asking a question. Also examined is the impact on all people and this would include both developing nations as well as developed nations. The source is also somewhat leading the reader to question the extent of the impact, which implies that there is a positive impact on sustainable prosperity. Also the fact that it states, “for all people” implies that all people benefit. While globalization may contribute to sustainability to a limited extent or in certain circumstances, on the whole, globalization degrades rather than builds sustainable prosperity. This will be explored through looking at globalization’s systems and forces, specifically consumerism, the media and transnational corporations.

During the last decade of the twentieth century, the word ‘globalization’ has become an increasingly prominent feature of political, social, and economic discussion in academic and policymaking circles, as well as in the media. The processes and outcomes of globalization drew attention and debates that had one thing in common. The research shows that nearly everyone agrees that globalization is a trend that is changing the face of the world, and as a result the world society lives in a more ‘globalized’ world. Nearly two and a half decades passed since 1990s, and studies have been conducted to examine the causes and consequences of globalization. Moreover, nearly every person experiences some type of globalization and can testify firsthand the effects it has on their life, society, and the state. The analysis of the effects that globalization dynamics have on the world society indicates that globalization has a significant positive impact via spreading opportunities and wealth across nations, stimulating innovation and productivity, enhancing the economic development of poorer countries, and helping to improve living standards.

There is good evidence that globalization has resulted in a considerable increase in world trade over the past 20-30 years. Costa (2008) claims that the globalization makes services, goods, people and ideas move throughout the world more easily. He also maintains that cross-border world trade will play a more and more significant role in global GDP. By 2017, it will approximately occupy 15 percent. Nevertheless, Lin Y. (2006) argues that the globalization also has serious drawbacks. He considers that globalization does harm to both developed and developing countries. Through globalization, few people in developing countries gets benefit. Most of them are still as poor as before because the change of there is so tiny. He also claims that although

The companies have become a key parameter, especially in the global economy. The size of global companies closely correlated with the decrease of vulnerabilities, with higher resistance to economic shocks occurred along the time and with their bigger chances of success in certain markets. Companies aim not only to optimize their size, but also to strengthen the global production networks, affording them a better competitive position, in a mighty competitive environment and under the pressure of quick development of the technological environment. The size of an organization has become a barrier that stops its entry into the sector, higher than profitability, which explains why some corporations have focused, in recent times, more on strengthening their position abroad, although their economic performance does not justify this endeavor. The process of economic globalization is both a resultant of the increasing activity of multinational organizations and a cause of their increasingly stronger internationally affirmation. However, global organizations activity is much more intense in the developed countries; their impact on the developing countries must not be neglected. Global organizations have a few main features that individualize them from all other forms of companies known so far:

We have seen the main aspects of Globalisation and his mechanisms during this report. Now we are going to explain the difference between globalisation and internationalisation. This are two words very close but not similar. Firstly, we will define internationalisation rigorously, and then we will see what internationalisation in the world is. We will try to explain the main stage. We also define globalization to be able to compare the two terms. Finally we underline the differences and similarities of globalisation and internationalisation.

One question that has been caused a lot of controversy over the years is whether or not globalization has more positive effects than negative effects. Globalization is a complex subject, so it is necessary to analyze the principal impacts on society before coming to any conclusions. On the one hand, developing countries which consume global products, globalization has positive impacts as well as multinational companies that establish new markets. On the other hand, some specialists say that globalization harms workforce and environment. This essay is going to approach one aspect of globalization in which multinational companies transfer investments from developed to developing countries and, as a consequence, it increases unemployment, social inequality, and pollution.

Aumentar el volumen de producción y venta, y crecimiento: Cemex tenía necesidad de expandirse globalmente, dado que su mercado doméstico en México es relativamente pequeño y que en 1989, la empresa ya dominaba 2/3 de la capacidad productiva donde le quedaba poco espacio para crecer . Además, la entrada de Holderbank en México al principio de los 90`s le generaba una fuerte presión competitiva, siendo que esa empresa ya tenía una presencia global importante.

The concept of globalization is one of the most talked about terms over the past decades. In fact, it is a highly popular buzzword that admittedly lacks a standard or commonly agreed upon definition. (Trebilcock, 2000). The concept of economic globalization stemmed from the root concept of “globalization” and by definition, pertains to that specific attribute of globalization that refers to the process of integration between the economic front and the ‘developed’, ‘under-developed’ and ‘developing’ economies (Naik, 2011). Economic globalization essentially comes together through international trade, FDIs (foreign direct investments) and the like (Naik, 2011).

This essay talks about the major shifts that Globalization has been responsible for over the last 30 years. It considers the contrasting views of both the people promoting globalization, and the people against globalization. It is suggested by globalizations ' promoters that it drives the economy of the world towards greater wealth, while its opponents claim that globalization has led to undesirable outcomes. The essay will also focus on these conflicting views and discuss the effects from the viewpoint of the:

In this essay, I will argue that the article “The Great Divide in the Global Village” by Bruce R. Scott provides more logical and factual evidence that helps under the complexity of national economic growth and development. Scott states a catching yet quick statement about how economical promises of the world, both domestic and foreign are misleading. He states “Mainstream economic thought promises that globalization will lead to a widespread improvement in average incomes.” However the evidence throughout the article that proves this statement is not valid. Scott’s main point revolves around this idea of globalization. Globalization can be defined as the process of increasing the connectivity and interdependence of the world 's markets and businesses. Globalization is the foundation of Scott’s article it lays the groundwork for countries to succeed or fail as explained by Scott in great detail. On the other hand, in the article “Why Nations Fail” by Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson they paint an extremely different projection that I will contrast and eventually show why it is inferior to Scott’s work.

Due to globalisation people are more connected around the world than ever before. Global manufactured goods and services that are produced in a certain part of the world are increasingly available in all parts of the world. Also, international travel is more frequent and international communication is commonplace. “Globalisation is an economic tidal wave that is sweeping over the world.” It can’t be stopped, and as a result there are countries that are winners and losers.

Globalization is an inescapable factor in the global economy today. Its effects can be felt throughout the world in industrialized and developing nations alike. The “process of globalization is so pervasive that it affects all businesses,” (Lawrence & Weber, 2014, p. 71). The benefits of globalization are apparent to organizations and nations such as reduction in poverty and benefits to consumers. But globalization must be properly balanced with a covential pledge to care for one another. Run amuck, globalization can facilitate negative effects on the environment, resource allocation and culturally diverse sustainability. Globalization is beneficial to the global economy, but must be balanced with a respect for

Despite number of analytical work, publication on globalization the subject remain unspecifiable or rather should say ill-defined regarding concept, history, and economic, cultural and political involvement (Scholte 2005). Yet theorists, researchers try to describe the term or the phenomena as simply as possible. There are two ways the word “globalization” can be used again adding more to the confusion. It can be used in a positive way describing a process into the global economy and another in a systematic way prescribing a know-how of progress founded on rapid integration with the global economy. Trade, investment and finance at the international level are the three economic expositions of the phenomenon. It is about development of economic activities not within but beyond national borders. It can simply be described as a process which has association with growing free economy, interdependency based on economy and thickening economic integration in the world economy. (Nayyar 2006).

Trade, foreign direct investment, and financial capital are three positive effects of the global economy. An example of economic globalization is, when major trades of goods are being transported from country to country. Some practices made by large transnational corporations have a negative effect. With the lowering of market costs, global scope, brand image consistency, quick and efficient use of ideas, and uniformity in marketing practices, globalization can be have a beneficial effect. In brief, the global spread of some values, beliefs and practices have negative and positive effects on the people and their cultures.